Turn on Fox News

Turn on Fox News

expect what liberals keep stereotyping Fox News as

It's a report on a bill about illegal immigration or government spending or something

Host calmly chats with two other political commentators

"What do you think about this bill?"

"I think this bill is good because [Reason X], but it has drawbacks, like [Reason Y]".

"Interesting. What do you think, other commentator?"

"I think this is a bad decision for Congress to make. In addition to the benefits, we need to consider drawbacks like [Reason Z]."

"Also a good point. You both make interesting arguments. Thank you for your time. Coming up next, the weather."

Check out "redeye"

Armond White is making fun of movies

I don't get it.
I thought this was the supposed brainwashing boogeyman that you keep claiming is destroying America. Why is it that outside of O'Riley and the other shows that are clearly marked as opinion-pieces like a Talk Show, that 90% of the channel calm and reasonable discussion among various guests and commentators? They had a fucking two-hour biography on President Kennedy the other day.
You really think that's somehow worse than literally editing a phone call to make it sound more "racist"?

Anyways what are other decent news channels or even series like old Vice that get a lot of hate, but aren't all that bad?

the propaganda about this propaganda is not accurate

you dont say

cats are weak as hell

Feral cats in particular seem able to walk off some pretty heavy injuries. The cat's still clearly alive in the pic and the cat's also clearly an adult and pretty heavy. If it was a kitten it'd have no chance.
Owls have pretty sharp talons and good grip strength so the cat clearly got injured when grabbed, but feral cats surviving pretty grim injuries are a common thing.
Eagles kill wolves when trained for it by humans. They can kill bears that way too, but these are by no means common occurrences.
At this point the owl has to drop the cat if it wants to kill it, but otherwise the owl is pretty fucked, especially since birds are less resilient than feral mammals. Also spare us your bullshit about the thousands of years of passing skills, animal instincts are written hard enough that these are almost never forgotten, and usually only lack experience that'll still be acquired when released in the wild for long enough. Release pigs into the wild and they'll reintegrate pretty well. Release dogs and they'll form packs and behave like wolves. Cats also do go back to their primal instincts and strays are pretty violent hunters, and while they're instinctual hunters, strays also have the actual experience needed to be effective, which is why people consider them pests. There are exceptions, but they're individual cases. So that anon is right, and it pains me to say it but these redditors quotes are mostly right, a bigger owl would destroy the cat, but that one is fucked unless it goes for the drop.

This, but we all know that op wasn't looking to have an honest discussion

Why is it that outside of O'Riley

old bait is old

I, for one, always look to Fox for intelligent discussions of today's news
Bonus points if that includes Trump's SecDef

ThreeMexicos.jpg - 2048x1146, 301.86K

Fox paid $700 million settlement for deliberately lying about the 2020 election
fuck off retard

They also got their covid shots before coming into the studio and following covid practices on set to look into a camera and tell their base that covid was a hoax.

It's just so blatant that they're going to tell their viewers whatever they want to hear, just like how Vance is going to hype up Haitians eating pets or whatever other obvious, easily disproven lie is big at that moment.

That's not thick and she's 6/10

It's supposed to seem reasonable. When two people talk calmly about something unhinged it makes it seem normal. That's why Fox spent so much time insisting in calm, measured tones that 8647 was a call to assassination despite everyone in that room knowing that it meant nothing of the sort and many conservative politicians were tweeting out 8646 during Biden's term. You fell for it.

Anecdotal bullshit.

suckers.jpg - 828x1073, 111.09K

Fox News is libshit propaganda now. OAN is the real MAGA network.

I, for one, always look to MSNBC for intelligent discussions of today's news. Bonus points if that includes Biden's literal White House propaganda Secretary.

This is the maga brain at work

arguing about the fake case is funny since it helped trump win. lol

Kay, why didn't Juan Merchan say that then?

It has nothing to do with Merchan.

Why could the jury assume this crime to be anything?

Because the law doesn't require someone to be convicted of another crime.

Only retards think that

trump would have won by more if not for the fake charges

now this is pretty based

Undeniably true: Von ShitzInPantz is part of the official record of that trial.

Anyways what are other decent news channels

One America News Network
oann.com

Nothing was fake. His signatures were all over the paperwork.

i agree with you he would have won more bigly

If he hadn't committed 34 felonies?

you claim his win was less because of the fake charges. interesting claim.

There were no fake charges. He did it. His signatures are proof.

there were no signatures lol

there were no signatures lol

ignorant, or just pretending?

paying a lawyer is illegal

LOL

there were no signatures lol

keep lying and loling

TrumpSig.jpg - 1651x678, 207.27K

Ah, you're being dishonest. You can leave now.

trying too hard
he left a trail in the ledger

you see this check to a lawyer

yeah, its illegal

lol

what did Cohen say it was for?

>you see this check to a lawyer

>yeah, its illegal

yes, it is illegal when the lawyer says it was not intended for the lawyer's services, but as a payoff to a skank, yet was listed in the ledger as "legal expenses:

its illegal to not use campaign funds

lolwut

lolwut

not going to explain it again, dimwit

what did Cohen say it was for?
how was it written in the ledger?
why are you so ignorant of business records?

what did cohen say

cohen admitted to making false statements lol

about what?
be specific.

you say cohen made a claim that shows trump as guilty of something yet cohen admitting to lying lol

you didn't answer the question (again)