Why are you afraid of communism?

Question

Why are you afraid of communism?

Because I don't like the thought of my wealth being redistributed to niggers

What wealth do you have anon?

You can't have my stuff

I've got a job

What stuff do you think you'll lose?

I make more money than you lol

I'm not afraid of sharing poop, but I also realize the systemic implications of redistributing sewage.
A better solution is to create a pipe from Andy Sixx's toilet to every fridge in the world.
This ending world hunger.

Workers support communism

Money, property, guns, food, my life, etc

Your personal property is safe. As long as you don't own capital (which judging by your ignorance you don't) you are ok

Lenin was a fraud who would have backed whatever narrative that brought him to power quickest. Trotsky was an underhanded jew, but at least he was a true believer.

The biggest thing modern "leftists" fail to understand is that for communism to have any chance of working you have to maximize the concept of an "us" ie ethnic and cultural homogeneity and not diversity is the key to success.

Do you know anything about communism?

What do you define as capital and who gets to determine what I own?

Means of production, anon. But you're asking good questions. It's important to understand the fundamentals

I'm afraid of americans who have no education on left-wing political systems making proclamations about how bad or good it is.

Communists stole food and confiscated guns from people they don't like (the proles) so no I don't think his personal property is safe.

Me too

What are means of production and who gets to determine what I own?

That never happened anon.

You get to determine the personal property you own and the means of production is pretty straightforward; it's anything that is necessary for the production of goods and services

Again, who gets to determine this? My garden hoe is used to produce goods, and I can use my PC to produce services.

Capitalism is the only economic system that channels humanity's natural tendencies toward greed and self-interest into something productive. Capitalist countries typically have between 5 to 7 times faster economic growth than countries with alternative systems and 89% of all technological innovations in the past century have come from capitalist countries. Even the bottom 10% in capitalist counties have a higher standard of living than the middle class in countries with alternative systems.

Your garden hoe and PC is not necessary for mass production anon. As far as the determination of what is and is not capital, Marxist theory has clear and concise definitions. I can link you some reading material if you'd like

humanity bad that's why labor must be exploited

Ok anon

You can't go by what Marx wrote alone, you will need an individual or a group to make determinations about future technology.

If your definition only includes implements of mass production, why were farmers targeted by communist regimes in Russia? And why did they enact gun confiscation?

Labor isn't being exploited

The working class have higher standards of living under capitalism than socialism. In functioning capitalist economies, workers have seen dramatic improvements in conditions, compensation, and rights. Since 1950, average wages have increased 300% in real terms while average work hours have decreased. Competition for labor drives improvements in working conditions.

First of all, communists will go by exactly what Marx theorized if they are indeed communists. That is why a vanguard party of educated cadre is necessary for the transition.

Second, the kulaks were owners of the land and capital, and resented their proletariatization. Guns were not confiscated, but returned voluntarily by Red Army soldiers following the civil war. Many guns were still owned privately by militia and huntsmen in the USSR.

Wrong, and very evidently too

That's because capital is concentrated in the West, anon. The wealth was only made possible through exploitation of the third world

Typical bot response.

A core aspect of communism (in theory) is that each individual sacrifices to the good of the group with the idea that as the group succeeds each individual within the group will succeed but not at the expense of others in the group. Where people like Marx and Lenin failed is they acted as if this should just happen when in reality it has to be forced because it goes against human nature. If you want any form of communism, or socialism for that matter, that is not achieved strictly by force people must see their countrymen as part of their 'familial" in-group. Because a creature is more willing to sacrifice for another if that other is more like itself (eg genetic relatedness) . Actual relatedness is less important than perceived relatedness. This is why "civic nationalism" fails where ethnonationalism doesn't.

Capitalism, on the other hand, loves diversity. A system that thrives on "getting one over" on the other guy works much better when "the other guy" is perceived as not being one of your own.

So no

You are free to negotiate with your boss for a higher pay if you think you're being exploited

He has a lot more bargaining power than me since he owns the means of production and I must sell my labor to him

So a group of communists get to make determinations based on marxist theory. What if they begin abusing that power, what safeguards ensure that they can't?

Every Kulak? Because a lot of those who did not own capital were also murdered, as tends to be the case in many communist countries. As for guns, they were not freely available to the populace, only people whose views aligned with the party.

The reason the third world is third world is because they haven't adopted market-based reforms that would bring them more prosperity