Democrats are violent entitled spoiled brats

Then what are Republicans? They destroyed the country to "own the libs"

Pics are of modern day europe

the irony

birds arent real

peace never solved shit. you niggers just drank different beers made by the same damn company. the jews still got those goybucks out of you/ those teslas be gone though.

those teslas be gone though.

are gone

You will NOT fair well when the war comes and sides are drawn.

oh jebus oh jebus weigh my heart against a handful of feathers and open your pearly gates, oh jebus oh jebus.
piss out my ass.

democrats are violent entitled spoiled brats

They are literal Fascists.

are americans actually this retarded?

aww, does your poor christkike soul weep? i will tell em to keep you alive, TO WITNESS THE END OF YOUR CULT >:3

Reminder that the top claims they can beat the bottom in a Civil War

We have guns and you don't. Molotov cocktails are no match against AR-15s, as Mr. Rittenhouse demonstrated when he owned an entire herd of you goons who tried in vain to murder him.

violent

your side wants to commit genocide against poc and trans people.

You are pro fascist. Does that mean you voted for Harris?

does talking about civil war make your dick hard? can you channels this machessemo towards commies like the slant eyed ones?

all enemies in war have no guns, this is EXACTLY how it would go down

preppers couldn't run a mile without having a heart attack if their life depended on it

think owning a gun and playing call of duty combos to become eternal life during end times

top are upset about a tranny in an beer ad

bottom are upset about being illegally fired by a neo nazi billionaire

false equivalence

You are pro fascist.

I'm against the state; fascism is when nothing exists outside of the state. Therefore, my views are actually the antipode of Fascism.

Peaceful conservative protest

Burn all tesla cars.
Death to Elona Musk.
RIP USA.

Toulose, France

Democrats

Just kys disinformation poster

It could have been far worse.

day of peace and love
basically an orgy
this one chick to a load to the neck
aka a 'pearl necklace'
her husband and children were SO proud

If you were anti-state you'd by calling for the end of the Trump regime.

You are a lying FAGGOT

The left is a problem all over the west.

You mean the solution

Chud

I don't think so

Faggot

You don't think period chud

You do what Daddy Trump tells you

The nazi's lost. Loser.

Call him a chudster
he really freaks hard over that

One day, a non-muslim man asked a Muslim man, "Why do you insist that your women cover their hair and their bodies completely?"
The Muslim man smiled and took out two candy bars. He left one wrapped and tossed it on the ground. He then opened the other one, broke it in half, licked one half, wiped the other half under his nose, crammed them both together, then tossed the saliva and mucus infused former candy bar wad on the ground. He then dropped his pants, urinated and defecated all over the unwrapped muddle of bodily fluids and chocolate, then for good measure spit on it. A stray cat wandered by and in a swift motion, the Muslim man grabbed it by the scruff of its neck, lifted its tail, then smeared its anus all over the contaminated mush that was once a candy bar as the cat screeched in fear and confusion. He then drew his sword and sliced the cat's neck open. He held the dying animal over the remnants of the violated candy bar and allowed its blood to completely coat what was left of it before flinging the feline's corpse into an alley.
"Now, I ask you," said the Muslim man, "which of these two candy bars would you rather shove up your ass?"

I was wondering where this came from. Good to know rightwing propaganda is dependent on lies as always.

deflecting from right wingers destroying our economy

Who pays you, shill?

Republicans ALWAYS lie.

Republicans ALWAYS lie.

At first the left advocated for tolerance, and that made sense, it even made me a Democrat at one point, but then they started demanding acceptance, and what they don't seem to realize is demanding acceptance eliminates freedom and individuality, (the very things they said they were fighting for) either you want complete and total acceptance, or you want freedom, you can't have both, forcing people to accept something strips them of their individual beliefs and freedoms

Cool now where does it show the author's party affiliation? Or did you just make an uneducated assumption?

here's a scenario that could possibly be worse than being raped:
You're a child whose mother accidentally left you in a sink of scalding hot water onto your face and body in an accident as a very young toddler, permanently disfiguring you into that of a hideously grotesque and horrifyingly warped amorphous sinewy ropey-scarred flesh demon. Your mother, stricken with irreconcilable guilt, lives a delusional fantasy parading you around on publicly televised self-help motivation talks and burn-victim awareness seminars, coddling you to soothe the immense regret, shame, resentment, and disgust she feels over the irreparable state of your unsightly ghoulish being. Simultaneously, you contracted a rare bacterial infection whilst in the operating room for your burns as an infant, which rapidly spread to your extremities, requiring the immediate amputation of all your limbs - the necrosis leaving the rest of your pickled, mutilated body resembling a writhing sack of beef jerky. Your father couldn't bear the ignominy of having a gigadisabled quadraspazzed son and left quietly, compounding your mother's demented psychosis, but not before he also took your perfectly healthy and strapping twin brother. A twin brother who you would then meet as a teenager in the school you're forced to share, assigned by the staff at his own enthusiasm to be your custodian and aide. A physical manifestation of the reality plundered from you, the better timeline narrowly missed by the cruelty of fate. To make matters worse, the twin brother is psychotic, and, tickled by the sheer hilarity of the colossal karmic imbalance represented in the flesh between you, decides to make every waking minute of your scholastic life a nightmare by forcing you, the vile pepperami-person that your scalded, charred, broken body has become, into doing all sorts of demeaning and disgraceful things at the threat of electrical and incendiary torture.

Like the time you guys threw a tantrum because your guy didn't win and stormed congress then spent several years in jail.
DJT is a traitor to our nation.

Member when kid rock shot up his beer stash in tears? Bahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Cool now where does it show the author's party affiliation? Or did you just make an uneducated assumption?

I made in intuitive assumption, because who else but a Democrat would seethes about Kyle Rittenhouse, supports BLM, and lies about the circumstances behind that situation?

But since you're an NPC and need it spelled out for you more clearly, I checked her twitter and found some tweets supporting Kamala, and a lot of tweets shitting on Trump.

It would seem that my "uneducated assumption" was correct.

Cool story, did donny lie here?

Yes Dawkins is a scientist so of course he's going to discuss religion with respect to its material claims. He wouldn't have such fertile territory to explore were it not for the fact that religions often do make material claims about the universe or, at the very least, they have a large number of believers who interpret their faiths in such a way.
You simultaneously criticize him having insufficient knowledge outside his field yet demand his arguments attain an unbounded breadth so as to encompass more diverse interpretations of religion. Now satisfying one surely means betraying the other, no? You admit no plausible criteria in which Dawkins' argument can satisfy you or even be evaluated by you as substantive because you have a puerile hostility towards his existence. In short, you're arguing in bad faith.
It's also worth nothing that defining a narrow bounds for a conversation is scholarly practice. If you don't agree with the material claims put forward by most religions then Dawkins' criticism should mean nothing to you. If anything, you should appreciate it, as it may drive away the more clownish adherents who tend to detract from everyone else.

OK PEDO