Been asking myself for years why Pee-Wee didn't bury his dick balls deep in E.G. Daily but after seeing Pee-Wee as Himself documentary I learned. PEE-WEE WAS GAY. PEE-WEE WAS GAY. PEE-WEE WAS GAY
Pee-Wee loved the BBC
The most revealing thing about that doc to me was the homo erotic scene in pee wee's Christmas special the fact set in right at that moment that the all of HBO and the entire Jewish Satanic pedophile cult really has been grooming us all since we were children.
The doc never said "Why" Reubens went to a damn porno theatre in Florida to jack off. It had to have been either drug related or he was with a fag friend that they didn't report. I don't think we got the whole story behind that stunt. That little incident destroyed his career and he never fully recovered from it in spite of the few movies he appeared in after.
I thing your going on about Pee-Wee to justify your own gayatee
Also believe she had that wholesomeness that cry tie me up and fuck me hard!!
Imagine if Rubenfeld was actually a pedophile scorned and now he's haunting and raping children in their dreams like a pee wee Freddy Kruger chasing them with his bike and that pee wee laugh until their little hearts give out from exhaustion and terror.
chris chan medallion between the handlebars
PEE-WEE WAS GAY
Sorta gives it all a little perspective huh?
got molestered by peewee
cooler tho
Oh, and OP, you will never the MAN Pee-Wee is!
PEE-WEE WAS GAY. PEE-WEE WAS GAY. PEE-WEE WAS GAY
Old news, specially if you knew him and Cassandra Peterson (Elvira) where close friends.
He was a creepy guy that built and promoted the PeeWee character. I don't think he was a pedophile but some kind of weird Jewish homosexual with a split personality. The documentary went into depth with discussion on how Reubens worked and lived with his alto ego PeeWee. He was truly a stange dude that made bank portraying that character.
sadly she is lesbian
When I was young and watching the original PeeWee show in the 80s, my dad would walk thru, giggle, and mutter "Fuckin Homo"
topkek dad, i miss u
Reubens' post-1991 career is pretty solid. I jacked off in a porno theater once. Not exactly a high crime. More like "When in Rome..."
Did you get to the part of the story where Reubens was charged with a law that would expire the next day, by some starfucker local DA?
Moralfags are simply fags.
Yep. Also, she's BIG into drag queen lgbtqa+ shit. All old news. Of course Paul was gay. Did you ever see that news spot where he's got a stack of CP magazines (boys) and he's explaining how's it just art? I remember seeing that on TV
I do and it is honestly considered art because of the age of the porn which was really just how porno was legitimized because it was considered nature magazines or something like that. Hr had millions of cp photos of underage boys.
Did you ever see that news spot where he's got a stack of CP magazines (boys) and he's explaining how's it just art? I remember seeing that on TV
liar. It was vintage artistic photos.
Paul Reubens made a fortune collecting and selling vintage porn BY THE PALETTE. The photos don't look like CP, just art with young boys, like painters and sculptors have done for millennia.
Why do you lie so much?
Hr had millions of cp photos of underage boys.
liar. He had one set that was part of something he bought in bulk on a palette. Paul Reubens was very successful trader of vintage porn.
Not gonna lie I cryed at the end. I loved Pee Wee as a kid and enjoyed all of Paul's movies.
Miss Yvonne = diamonds!
That is exactly what I said is that it was considered art and is art but it really isn't. Playboy only exists because it was considered art aswell and I don't think anyone would consider it porn. Real fact one of the models on the cover were underage in playboy.
Several playmates – including Nancy Crawford (April 1959), Donna Michelle (December 1963), Linda Moon (October 1966), Patti Reynolds (September 1965) and Teddi Smith (July 1960) – posed when they were 17. Elizabeth Ann Roberts (January 1958) – whose pictorial was called "Schoolmate Playmate" – posed when she was 16.
would argue that it isn't porn now
Very doubtful but i'm not calling him a pedo and just a cunnysseur lol
t h r e a d
He was Pinky Lee of the 90s. He was influenced.
cp, not arrested, sure incel.
he was talking about you
A couple made for a Beatle Juice film.
after seeing Pee-Wee as Himself documentary I learned. PEE-WEE WAS GAY
so what? his personal sex preferences shouldnt matter as long as he didnt push them on others or was a pedo. fuckoff you retarded nigger
That is exactly what I said is that it was considered art and is art but it really isn't.
Pics were art. The lighting was silohuetted.
There was no internet in the late-50's and early-60's...you complete fucking retard. AoC laws were by state.
Just shut the fuck up with your constant slander.
are you pretending to be retarded for attention?
You called him someone who own millions of photos of cp. That is a bold-face lie. I think the collection was less than 30 photos.
You really need to read more and speculate less.
Never said he wasn't arrested. Just said it was a fairly small collection of art photos that was part of a palette of vintage porn he purchased.
He was a very successful dealer in vintage porn.
He regularly traded so he most likely did have that and despite it being artistic it would be considered cp now because it was nude minors in the day and age where showing your own children bath photos is considered sexual exploitation of children on most platforms.
are you pretending to be retarded for attention?
ironic.
No it isn't he was a vintage porn trader so it would be considered child exploitation material
so he most-likely
bullshit.
Parents and photographers regularly had contracts for such photos. They weren't having sex. Art photos.
As I repeat, the images were silhouetted. You can literally see pictures of kids at nudist camps legally. Nothing sexual. Not even artistic. Non-sexual nudity is legal.
Isn't it funny how you give trump a free pass?
lol it's called a loophole
He purchased vintage porn BY THE PALETTE. He didn't even know he had it. His collection had so much more stuff that wasn't the one small set of photos.
No it isn't he was a vintage porn trader so it would be considered child exploitation material
That sentence doesn't even makes sense, you goddamn retard.
Reubens was charged with an obscenity law that only had 2 more days on the books by a local DA looking to get in the papers.
There was no "loop" for there to be a "hole" back then, you fucking retard. It was an unconstitutional obscenity law that would be struck down in 2 days.
TRUMP!!!
lol, lmao even
Look at the list of sex crimes trump settled. It's not a secret.
I know if someone accused me of forcing a young to suck me off, I would have defended my name in court and not settled. Then again, trumpers will swallow anything. They were probably jealous.
Ok we are getting to legality here so specific dates have to be made
Remember I said it would be considered cp now in 2025 and those photos were "nature and lifestyle" pictures like other porn companies labeled their porn back in the 50's and 60's then
Faggot, most people on here aren't Paul Reubens historians. Calm down. Also, would you guys run defense for a guy having a stack of pictures of naked little boys, in real life? I sure as hell wouldn't. Details be damned.
Dude. He's only been arrested twice for sex stuff. Hit the wiki.
17 and 16 in the 50s and 60s, oh the horror. How about Broke Shields in 73?
Look at the list of
NO fuck you. Fuck off to /pol
He purchased vintage porn BY THE PALETTE and did not know he possessed those photos.
They didn't find any other evidence except those photos.
I'm "running interference" for the truth. Lying shitstain.
He looks kind of dumb, that toothy grin.
It doesn't matter what someone else did but what is important is he had it and no he wasn't ignorant of it. I still like peewee but and I don't consider him a pedo but he did have it.
Reubens' post-1991 career is pretty solid. I jacked off in a porno theater once. Not exactly a high crime. More like "When in Rome..."
Jacking off in a room full of dudes jacking off is gay as hell
that's one of the shooters that perpetrated the columbine shootings. not really something to joke about
no he wasn't ignorant of it
citation?
Ahaha how did that get in there officer
It's the same excuse they all use
BY THE PALETTE
BY THE PALETTE
Yeah we heard you already, retard. The thing is, he didn't immediately BURN said photos. No normal person would try to defend this.
Not really. He was like an eternal kid.
There is no sexual element. A bit childish and some bathroom humor but sex went way over his head at the core. Whatever innuendo was our fault for being wise to it. As a character he was completely aloof. I shunned any girl that showed interest and only sought people that wanted only to be really good friends. That's not gay that's just childhood.
I jacked off in a photo booth, by myself. The clerk store got into a booth next door and asked if I wanted my dick sucked. He looked like The Bounty Hunter, which made it even easier to say no. I zipped up and left.
My wife had just given birth and she literally frowned on me trying to rub one out in the bathroom. So glad I divorced.
He intentionally put adult humor and that's why adults and children liked the show. He was an adult comedian like bill saget.
I have no source for my lie
Liar.
There is no sexual element
...dude
That why I said... "any innuendo we saw was our own fault for being aware" and "as a character he was aloof"
that is pretty much what he says when questioned by anyone just like all the others who have that thing
it was intentional
He wasn't aware he had them. Dude literally had a warehouse and traded internationally until his death and was only busted once for something that vaguely didn't pass as art.
You aren't a normal person or this discussion would already be over.
Reading comprehension is not your forte
The character he portrayed has zero sexual element. Any innuendo was aimed at adults. The character PeeWee had zero interest and like any normal child was oblivious to the implications.
Pee Wee as a kid.
that is pretty much what he says when questioned by anyone just like all the others who have that thing
word salad. no proof. just admit you are a compulsive-lying retard already.
And as a child watching it I have no memory of any sexual connotation. Are you unintentionally stupid or just acting?
If >There is no sexual element.
Then how come >"any innuendo we saw was our own fault for being aware"
Exactly its a character who made adult jokes because of the creator and it was funny like a child say cock instead of clock because they are unaware
You aren't a normal person or this discussion would already be over.
Yeah, because normal people know these details about Pee wee Herman
It's cool that you are mentally bereft of any ability to connect the dots. Thank god PeeWee taught me how to apply implications implicitly and make correlations between character and world. His character was not sexual. This whole thread is about PeeWee as a character. Whatever innuendo in the show he was oblivious too. I'm done explaining this to you slack jawed ignorambeciles..
I am very antisemitic. I hate homo fags. I don't care, I still love Pee-wee.
PeeWee is a dude acting like a little kid. His laugh, his jokes, his imagination, his toys, his food. Everything all of it. A little kid with a playhouse and a bunch of crazy friends. Children aren't themselves remotely sexual unless they've been abused. I feel like that's one of the indicators that you were in fact harmed as a child if you see it any other way. His entire persona is just being a smartass silly kid. Goddamn gen z and alpha are next level retarded.
Thank god PeeWee taught me how to
Absolutely pathetic.
This whole thread is about PeeWee as a character
This includes his show, dumbass.
Whatever innuendo in the show he was oblivious too.
PEE WEE. ISNT. REAL. also, it's "to" ;)
His show/movie had plenty of sexual innuendos
Goddamn gen z and alpha are next level retarded.
How tf are you so fucking socially retarded that you think gen z or a has stock in this conversation?
Since you have repeatedly proven you don't know the details, you keep proving your own point in irony.