When do we get to live in a country where the president is allowed to do his job and judges are not allowed to do things outside their jobs?
When do we get to live in a country where the president is allowed to do his job and judges are not allowed to do...
"we" live in a country with checks and balances to prevent retarded people in power from doing retarded things. What you're looking for is a monarchy, you should find one and go live there
We are. Gotta have a president who does his job and not the job of congress though.
What you're looking for is a monarchy
let god sort them out
Didn’t the republitards throw a shitfit every time Obama issued an executive order? Now suddenly blocking executive orders is a crime against democracy?
Get your shit together.
Here's a question I've asked a couple of leftists (such as yourself) and it seems to short-circuit their brain ...which amuses me.
There's a carrier task force in the Mediterranean right now. Let's say Trump, acting as command-in-chief, orders it to sail to the Persian Gulf.
...a circuit court judge issues an emergency injunction against this, and orders the carrier group to stay put in the Med.
Do you think the judge has exceeded his authority?
For some reason, no leftist has yet answered the question. They are either too cowardly to answer it, saying something like "that wouldn't happen" or too low-IQ to even contend with it, saying "but that hasn't happened; I did eat breakfast"
Kek, good point.
How retarded are you idiots?
Tell us exactly how it should work.
When we have a President who didn't sleep through American History class in high school and thus knows what checks and balances are.
The king should be able to do whatever he wants, and anyone who opposes him should be sent to exile
Obviously you don't fully understand it either.
What checks and balances do we have for judges?
Stfu kys retard faggot.
Congress makes the laws. Judges interpret the laws, not the executive.
I love how angry the left is.
When presidents do what they claimed in their campaign promises, what we elected them for, represent the voting taxpaying citizen, and not be a subhuman trash narcissist who destroys everything they handle.
And remember "covfefe" means the noise from windmills causes cancer, and drink the bleach,
I thought Trump was supposed to be anti-war.
And who checks the judges?
so youre saying that judges shouldnt be concerned with compliance with applicable laws but?
Congress. Executive appoints the judges.
Yeah, you definitely don't sound like you have anger issues. No, sir!
Nice sidestep/deflection.
How exactly does congress check a judge?
I would prefer if America wasn't trying to invade every other country just because it wants their resources.
And Trump didn't threaten to annex what are supposed to be America's allies.
I'm not doing your homework for you, timmy.
Oh boy, we have a fucking genius here. Tell me genius, what would you have said if Biden made guns illegal by executive order. You’d sure want the courts to step in on that!
So you have no real answer.
Youre just making up shit.
trying to invade
I love your retarded histrionics.
autism, the post
Fucking lol.
America shouldn't be invading other counties willy-nilly.
President is king. They should be able to do whatever they want.
Where did the marines land if we're invading countries?
Ever hears of impeachment? Go away and let the big people talk.
Show me when congress has impeached a judge.
Moving goal post now?
Lolz, you're saying congress checks the judicial, now tell me when they've done that.
Should be simple.
It's called pattern recognition.
America has a history of thinking it should own the world.
And Trump's own statements confirm that he wants to continue in this tradition.
Is google broken where you live? Sorry you don't like how checks and balances work
Again, you have no real idea.
You're just making shit upp with no proof.
you're making stuff up
Am I? See below
constitution.congress.gov
Okay when was the last time congress impeached a judge?
never forget, russians arent people.
congressional approval required on supreme court justices
I’m not a liberal but I’ll take a crack at this. As commander and chief he has constitutional authority. he has broke no law so no judge would even think of issuing an injunction. However just remember Congress can only declare war.
Try using google
the only way to check another branch is by impeachment
Tell me how congress checks the judicial.
See
hurr durr google is always the truth
You just soak up whatever slop big tech wants you to see you retarded lazy sheep.
lazy sheep
wont look up answers for yourself
Pick one
Muh rando google searches i didnt read...
Fucking lol.
I implicitly trust google always.
You are for sure sheep.
See
As predicted, no leftist can answer.
This response amounts to "but that hasn't happened (because trump is anti-war)"
no judge would even think of issuing an injunction
This response is, "that would never happen"
Notice how those are the EXACT RESPONSES that I predicted.
Here's an intelligent answer: judicial authority is limited, and that injunction would violate its limits.
But nobody seems to be smart enough to answer that.
See Protip: it's not Google's information
trusting Google
The dude posted .gov websites. Are you fucking retarded?
See
If anon didnt play dumb then his thread would have been over after the first post
.gov sites are from the government and therefore totally trustworthy
That boot must be delicious.
Go ahead and show us were they're wrong
you cant get info about how the gov works from the gov
Kek
Tell me when congress has impeached a judge.
See
Why does the so-called "republican" party want to turn America into an absolute monarchy?
There is this one weird trick that most presidents know called "following the law and not committing crimes". If they do that, courts actually can't block or stop his policies. I know, sounds crazy right?
You've almost gone full circle here. To be honest, I trust gov sights far and away more than I would anyone on this shithole. And that ain't saying much
Because they know their party is dead so they're profiting off it as much as they possibly can before we put an end to the entire worthless GOP. They're the party of grifters and con artists.
/thread
Is that why the democrat leadership is imploding?
Trump has spent his whole life as someone above the law.
Why would he expect that to change?
Already done asking people to google for you?
Ree google is everything
Fuck zoomers are lazy idiots.
Go ahead and use any search engine you like...
If you feel you have a point to make, you'll make it with words.
See
And that is not the full answer. The correct answer is that judge's authority is limited by a combination of factors, including the specific court they preside over, the laws they are bound to interpret, and the Constitution. Constitution being the operative word. Thereby my answer was correct.
Both sides of the mono-party are imploding.
FPTP and the electoral college are the only things keeping them alive.
If you feel you have a point to make, you'll make it with words.
If you want an answer beyond what was spoon fed to you look for it yourself
Dude, the first post is exactly the same as his current schtick, he's poisoning the well, and now that someone has pointed out that he doesn't remotely understand our country, he is going to continue to be righteously indignant.
If his first comment is based on his current understanding, you should question whether it had any merit.
The fact you don't understand that is crazy, your first thought was "Anon could've made this point in just one post." Rather than "well that is obviously stupid."
look for it yourself
It's not my job to argue for your positions.
It's clear that you're not intelligent enough to present an argument yourself. That's sad - typical, but sad.
Least politically educated people I've ever met believe this shit. "Muh a few corrupt policies means everyone is working toward the same end!"
Every human being ever born was born with inherent selfishness, it always manifests itself first, usually in the form of hoarding toys or whatnot. By the time we are adults, we are coming up with ways to benefit ourselves, without thinking of others. This is no different, people supporting the same laws regarding campaign finance or congressional stocks (Which also isn't true, Democrats have put forward multiple campaign finance and stock bills intending to ban stock purchases for senators, and to limit campaign finance from major institutions. Those bills were killed by a majority Republicans in the house, with a couple dozen Democrats joining in. It's easy to see who the Democrats should investigate, but barely any Republicans supported the measure! Look into it, no fluff, introduced by Mark Kelly.)
For a measure to truly be bipartisan, it would be nearly unanimous, or hold the appearance of being unanimous, with the abstentions and nays on both sides being near equal. This is never the case in the bills people argue make the "parties the same."
Every single time, without fail, people who believe this are people who held highly partisan beliefs, and are now questioning their party, but due to their partisanship, are unable to even confront the policies and claims of the opposition, instead they simply claim that their party is "doing what everyone else is doing" which leads to "mono party!" Or "two wings same vulture!"
It's literally a response to being unable to accept that you might've been wrong, so instead of being wrong twice, you just accept what you can and protect yourself from the rest, most people don't ask "What else am I wrong about?" When this happens, because being wrong physically hurts us, literally. Humans are hardwired to avoid being wrong like we avoid pain.
yummy yummy schwabs daddy ^w^. purge an anticitizen for me will you.
That 'leftist' bullshit. Calm down man. It's such tedious bullshit.
The politically uneducated view is that the Dems as a party actually care about the lower classes because they and their supporters claim to be left-wing.
Both parties are the same pro-big-business, pro-war, pro-giving-American-money-to-Israel nonsense with only minor differences to make them look better in the eyes of their supporters. (Like which ethnic group they hate the most, as a pure divide-and-conquer tactic.)
America needs a system that actually respects the people, not just the interests of the wealthy.
And no, Trump ain't it. Because he is the wealthy.
Nice projection
Jesus Christ take a fucking civics lesson before you start arguing politics like you know anything. We have three branches of government for a reason. No one branch is without checks from the others.
I cannot comprehend this fucking retardation. The school system failed you all.
Congress has impeached 15 federal judges in US history, with 8 of them being convicted and removed from office. The most recent impeachment of a federal judge was in 2010, for Judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr. If you bothered to do any research at all before posting retarded shit you would have found this page 1, first result.
and you faggot spent the entire time shitting your pants over republicucks attempts to block him from doing that whats your point. yall keep trying to get rid of the tools the other side uses to stop you. demosharts keep trying to get rid of the filibuster cuz retardicans use it to stall, then theyll do the same when its their turn. we are all tired of this sides cucked bullshit