Aussie Man Jailed For Loli Game

BREAKING: Man jailed for a decade for making Loli game. Has his cars, computers and phones SEIZED. Fined almost a million dollars.

A 32-year-old man has been sentenced to nearly 12 years in prison and ordered to pay more than $850,000 to the Commonwealth after creating and selling an online video game that simulated child sexual abuse.

The man, who was living in Highton, Geelong was arrested in August 2023 after a joint investigation by the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and Victoria Police uncovered the disturbing content of the game, which featured animated child exploitation material and allowed users to simulate abuse scenarios.

Thousands of people are believed to have paid for access to the game.
The Criminal Assets Confiscation Taskforce (CACT) obtained a restraining order on the man's assets a day before the search warrants were executed. The investigation revealed the man had made significant profits from the game, which he used to buy vehicles, luxury items and electronics.

As part of the court orders, assets now confiscated include: the proceeds from the sale of two motor vehicles, 48 high-value household items including televisions and audio-visual equipment and more than $30,000 in cash.

The man must also pay a pecuniary penalty of more than $850,000 to the Commonwealth.
"Legislation does not separate simulated offending against children from offending against real children – both are criminal," he said.

"To treat this as a game is vile. To profit from it is utterly abhorrent."

Since 2019, the taskforce has confiscated more than $1.2 billion in assets, including homes, vehicles, fine art, and yachts.

amp.9news.com.au/article/c716ad95-ab71-4725-bcd5-ad61510886aa

IMG_1368.jpg - 1242x933, 664.65K

what are the details

is this a child dating simulator or a child rape simulator

the devil is in the details

All of his televisions, furniture, and any cars were seized as they were reasonably suspected to be the proceeds of crime.
None of the images depicted real children, but did depict animated children.

IMG_1369.jpg - 1242x2151, 1.11M

Child abuse simulator
So he had his whole life fucked basically
All items seized and sold, fined a million dollars and sent to jail for 10+ years for making an animated sex game
That’s crazy

Child abuse simulator

ok that's a weasel word. dating a child can be categorized as "child abuse" by totalitarian regimes. give us the deets, nigger. what did this game depict

That’s what I want to know too.
Articles are vague about it

yeah loli is illegal here. depicting lisa simpson fucking bart is considered the same as cp.
you can argue whether that's sensible or not but making a game like that when you know the laws of the country you're in is outright retarded, deserves what he got

Okay here we go:
West pleaded guilty to creating the online game where users were encouraged to rape, sexually abuse and commit incest with children as young as 12.

So it was a rape sim. Fucking gross

IMG_1370.jpg - 1242x650, 268.49K

I know it’s illegal.
Yeah I thought it was maybe just a dating sim or something but the feds had every right to do what they did - the simulator wasn’t just a dating sim lol

if it depicted nudity of cartoon children, or sexual acts in any way, he was going to get jail and he knew what he was making was illegal.
its a little surprising that he only got 10 years considering he's in the same boat as 'distribution and sale of CSAM' but the australian courts don't go for punitive sentences too much

Yeah lets take away the fictional stuff so people go for the real deal.

surprising that he only got 10 years considering he's in the same boat as 'distribution and sale of CSAM'

My thoughts exactly, this fucker should’ve got the rope by the sounds of it
You could argue that the fictional stuff encourages people to become real predators and is just as bad

Lol, fucking Aussies lost all their backbone. Crocodile Dundee is a myth, they're absolutely castrated as a people.

it is definitely non sensical. people are at peak pedo phobia in 2025, almost in a way to get ahead of being accused of such. it's kind of like nazi phobia from 5 years ago.

The hard part is usually figuring out whether the government is over stepping and annihilating lives over just what they deem to be “abuse” - or whether the content actually depicts real abuse.
But every time I get skeptical I end up finding out the cops had every right to do what they did and it’s not tyranny at all.
It’s very relieving

IMG_1372.jpg - 493x280, 22.18K

people are at peak pedo phobia in 2025, almost in a way to get ahead of being accused of such

It’s not to “get ahead of being accused” it’s just genuinely because pedos deserve the rope. And it’s peaking because of the slap meme vids on twitter
sounds like they gained a backbone to me

IMG_1373.jpg - 1242x1254, 586.44K

Aussies are boot licking cucks now
How sad.

From what I could find, the game was called Proud Father. Could be wrong. Def not gonna find out what kind of sim it is

yes the entire country is cucks because they don’t tolerate child abuse material /s

Why do you stick up for child porn and call people who don’t like it “cucks”? Bit weird

Nah, they just dont have basic rights anymore.
Pure cuckery.
The aussies are trying to fit the whole fucking boot in their mouths

You could argue that the fictional stuff encourages people to become real predators and is just as bad

I would really, really like to see some proper research conducted into this.

Proud Father.

Fucking disgusting I’ve heard enough, I’m not even searching it up
glad the creators life is fucked
Here’s a photo of the creator Alec Stephen West

IMG_1374.jpg - 639x480, 26.94K

How he looked 3 days ago when sentenced in court

IMG_1376.jpg - 738x415, 14.15K

Yeah true. The more you study case files the more it appears that the "good" pedos get off with a slap on the wrist while the "bad" pedos get anally violated with an autistic interpretation of the law taken to the extreme.

pedos get anally violated with an autistic interpretation of the law taken to the extreme

I love that

its been the law in australia for 15 years or so, he's been pinged for blatantly violating a law he knew about that has been in place his whole adult life. pedophobia does seem to be wild in some bits of the world but this isn't it.

Australia equated flat tits as child abuse content for a bit there. They have completely lost their damn minds and the only way you could convince me otherwise is if it turned out their madness is actually a pretext for pushing invasive dystopian agendas.
"Protect the children!" Screw the children. Who is going to protect the adults?

The aussies have gone full 1984.

I don't. I view harsh punishments against the monsters in our midst as a necessary evil to protect the innocent. I take no sadistic satisfaction in it. Furthermore I think anyone that does derive such pleasure is highly suspect.

I am concerned about the recent celebration of extrajudicial vigilantism against pedos and justifying it to gain moral superiority. Something does not sit right with me about this trend

depicts real abuse

how exactly does one 'abuse' a fictional character? pretending to fuck an imaginary person is, categorically, a victimless act. imprisonment for thought crime sounds like textbook tyranny to me

Australia equated flat tits as child abuse content for a bit there.

That's just a meme. One Australian politician proposed such a bill 30 years ago and it got struck down.

Australia equated flat tits as child abuse content for a bit there

But it didn’t stick, otherwise Doki Doki on steam would be illegal

They have completely lost their damn minds

I don’t think that’s true at all anon I think logic prevails for the most part here. Is your economy doing any better today? Lol

law is in place for 15 years

you only find out about it when a guy selling a game about raping children gets arrested

THIS IS 1984 THOUGHTCRIME MY FREE SPEECH IS BEING VIOLATED BECAUSE HE SHOULD BE ABLE TO PROFIT FROM CHILD RAPE FANTASIES

Drawings are not real.

Be glad you weren't around for the 1970's. Getting slapped around on le youtube is a fucking joke by comparison.

If it's a law that means it's moral, right?
Good grief the boot must taste like strawberry for you to be so addicted to it.

His life was nuked from orbit by pants on head silly laws created purely due to pedophobia. He was a dumb fuck for trying to do that while living in a glorified prison colony but the source of the problem is obvious.

Yeah true. And the pedos who are getting caught are big retards.

It’s not a matter of sadism for me anon, it’s a matter of justice.
There’s satisfaction in justice.

IMG_1377.jpg - 783x391, 28.35K

victimless act

Until there becomes a victim when they try to take their sick fantasies to the real world.

I will not pass judgment until I see the content of the game for myself.

However, I will lend credibility to the justice system as they tend to be more rational than hysterical pedo jews like to portray them as.

The thoughts and urges they compel in people are real, and entertaining the concept is the same thing regardless
The laws make sense

Better outlaw action games and movies and horror movies and games then huh?

No there isn't. It's a bitter taste of brutality. You have obviously never worked a single day of your life in law enforcement.

If you are calling a video game designer minding their own business a monster deserving of immense suffering you have a seriously warped view. Look in the mirror. There will be a monster looking back.

Nope.
Why not outlaw a movie like "the hills have eyes" or "falling down"?

I am concerned about the recent celebration of extrajudicial vigilantism against pedos

Sure, but what’s also concerning is the sexualisation of children and a lack of regulation to prevent underage individuals from accessing things like dating websites. I mean we can blame the symptoms or we can blame the cause. Old men shouldn’t be allowed to register for Roblox.

you are very angry about a law you didn't know existed until today and you have seen used sensibly
yeah he could have shifted to thailand or some shit easily, he could have set up some corporate structure internationally to sell the game and he would just be some 'consultant on game issues', but he chose the path with everything leading clearly to him in a country where it was a crime. it was silly.

His life was nuked from orbit

He should be thankful he wasn’t given the chair

playing call of duty is a victimless act, until you decide to shoot up a mall because of it. same argument, just as retarded

If he was crafting a simulator of crying children being physically violated then he most certainly is a monster.

Were they the slightest bit rational they would be minding their own lives instead of hunting down video game producers with wrong think.

You’re right
It’s just a meat grinder isn’t it

Not angry at all. Just mocking rightless aussies cucks.
These are the same losers who gave up their guns and gladly went to camps for the rona.
They are sheep

If you think building and profiting off a rape simulator isn’t monster tier behaviour you must have a seriously warped view

Kys pedo

Movies don’t generally depict children being raped

yeah u mad

Cuckstraya

That was his first mistake.

he could have shifted to thailand or some shit easily

I mean the guy had like six months where he was on bail where he could’ve hopped on a boat and started a new life

this is a dumb argument, why not just ban all movies tv and video games which glorify all illegal activity?

have you ever played a video game where you shoot people? congratulations, you sit around fantasizing about going on a murder spree. you're a monster, by your own logic

If what he had created was a simulator on how to pleasure children so they receive the best possible orgasms physically possible they would not have given him a 10 year sentence. The dude must've crossed the fucking line and gone into physical violation territory.

Fair point, but still skeptical as to whether they’re the same thing

Stay on your knees sheep.
It's where cowards belong.

You’re wrong about everything and come across as a bit mentally stunted

I see mutilated babies on this site every other week. No one says a fucking thing.
Your someone somewhere might do something sometime because they saw it before is one of the biggest piles of crap this world has to offer.
Personal responsibility exists and morals exist. If all it takes for you to throw either out the window is a piece of media then you belong in a straight jacket. Not as the example for which laws the common person is subjected to are built upon.

No, but they do have them killed a lot.
We should ban any movie with shooting or a car chase by your absurd reasoning

You seem the the type that meekly does what they are told instead of thinking for yourself.

why not just ban all movies tv and video games which glorify all illegal activity?

I think “violence” in entertainment media is generally considered acceptable as it can fall into the thriller/horror/fear categories and still remain socially viable, whereas with child abuse there is no socially viable category for it to fall into as it’s just reprehensible.

There is a big audience for horror films and shooter games, but not anywhere near as much for CSAM. It’s just not an accepted thing, it’s not the same as GTA V

bastard out of carolina 1996

Dev handle goes by Westy

His game is called Proud Father.

Here's some screenshots.

Repeat after me "It is a video game."
Unless that game has the home addresses of real people or something of a similar nature there is not a single thing about this that is not based purely on contempt for a demographic.

perhaps the key difference is that the child raping thug is portrayed negatively whereas these lolicon child rape simulators put you in the first person seat

If you are not saying the same thing about every action and horror movie that ever was shut the fuck up. Your trite hypocrisy destroys lives.

the point is, engaging in something fictional that would be unacceptable in real life is harmless, as long as you don't proceed to then do it in real life. remember the whole wave of soccer moms screeching about violent video games, and how their kids were gonna become serial killers because of them? it's the exact same shit, just with a new flavor.

if you do INSERT FICTIONAL BAD THING, that means you will want to do it for real

we all know that's bullshit, we have precedent after precedent of that NOT happening, and its STILL not happening

CSAM is a horrifying concept. The ends do not justify the means.

It’s a video game that has absolutely no merit for existence other than to meet the twisted curiosity and perversions of child predators.
Why do you want this game to be legal so badly?

thoughts I don't like should be illegal

Getting the chair would be more merciful and you know it.

Good

The works of child predators can sometimes have artistic merit.

I decide what is right and wrong

This is the problem with authoritarian people.

siding with the rights of fictional characters over the freedom of your own people is PROFOUNDLY retarded
nobody is getting hurt, full stop. what more needs to be said? giving a fuck is peak karen behavior

remember the whole wave of soccer moms screeching about violent video games

As discussed previously, violence is generally accepted and considered viable since there’s a large enough audience for it. When polled, humans say horror themes and violence are generally acceptable, but almost 100% of humans can agree that child abuse is not. Do you see the difference yet?

Well it’d save us a lot of tax money that’s for sure
What an absolute crock of shit

I’m proudly glad that he’s in jail and all of his shit got seized

Given that 3% of the population are pedophiles and another 2% fetishize pedophilia I'd say that number has been tainted by the effects of peer pressure.

Australia

Yes we know Anglo countries don't have free speech.
Aus, NZ, UK, Can, are all anti-loli police states

Not a fan of mind police stomping on the neck of humanity. People that advocate for criminal eyesight should be taken out back and shot. If you disagree get the fuck off Anon Babble. You know what is on here. A person that thinks we should all be treated as criminals should not be here.

You don't want to go down this rabbit hole.
Hehe see what I did there. The creator of Alice in Wonderland was a child predator.

Okay, so 1 in 20 people would find the artistic value in CSAM material and 19 in 20 would be against it. That still isn’t really a good argument for making it legal.
Go poll how many people agree with violent video games existing and you’ll find it’s much higher than 3%.

Free speech doesn’t mean the freedom to publish child abuse content though, that’s just an abuse of free speech.

It's the slippery slope; the reason the aussies have no fucking rights anymore.

1 in 20 is a very big number, especially when applied to the current world population of 7 billion.

freedom is what i say it is

You hate freedom.
Pretty simple there.

Hell yeah child abuse simulation.

c3I5SR.jpg - 1920x1080, 209.56K

mind police stomping on the neck of humanity.

A morbidly obese basement dwelling video game dev addicted to child pornography was rightfully sent to jail and had the proceeds of his crimes seized. You’re blowing things out of proportion

To bring this all back into a rational perspective, the ratio of people that support content depicting violent rape of resistant and defenseless children drops down precipitously. Far, far below 5 or even 3 per cent.

95% Is bigger than 5%
I think I’m done with you

the ratio of people that support content depicting violent rape of resistant and defenseless children drops down precipitously. Far, far below 5 or even 3 per cent.

This
Guy is performing serious mental gymnastics to defend his child attraction addiction

A person minding their own business was kidnapped and robbed by the government for making what someone else does not like. You like they justify it out of contempt and nothing more.
Heads would roll were the world a just place.

you need to keep in mind that we're talking about IMAGINARY violence and IMAGINARY abuse.
something being unpopular doesn't justify prosecuting and punishing thought crime
nobody is talking about making CSAM legal, that's a strawman. what's being said is, you can't call something child abuse when there's no child. there's just a person sitting at home masturbating to a drawing of a fictional character. equating the two to each other is fucking stupid, and it trivializes real, actual abuse

Oh so now we're justifying tyranny of the majority?

Gobbo family portrait.

Proud_Father.jpg - 1024x576, 88.77K

So if you enjoy slasher movies you are a serial killer?

Well now hang on a second. The point here is that even among pedophiles there is a stigma against content that depicts unwilling children being abused and violated.

im saying the majority will think you’re an idiot

Very well. However minorities nonetheless have rights within a modern civilization.

In other news

No Mercy.png - 668x848, 253.5K

Lolz, pure 1984.

even among pedophiles there is a stigma against content that depicts unwilling children being abused

100%
I remember a doco I watched about this not long ago where they housed all of the people on the sex registry in a small community together and half of the offenders would keep the rest “in check” let me see if I can grab it
Essentially half of them knew it was wrong

That is so bad
Must be from all the blacked porn

Nicola gobbo?

Pedos in shambles

whatever, what is the game called and where do i pirate it?

Retard.

why?

players are next scum

they are literally pixels and lines of code. what is wrong with it?

The aussie government can't tell the difference between reality and fantasy again. At this point, Russia pedos should just exploit real kids since the punishment will be the same. Congrats Aussie gov, you removed a victimless outlet, and gave a reason for actual offending pedos to target actual children.

Why isn't this game banned in Australia?

From its Steam's "About This Game"

FEATURES

Decapitating people and eating their remains.

Suffocating an innocent child to death.

Ritual murders and human sacrifices.

Siblings kissing on the mouth.

Domestic violence.

The aussie government just wants to be like the Chinese government

The chinks already own their ass. Most of it is just China by proxy.

Sad, the aussies are pathetic now.

something being unpopular doesn't justify prosecuting

I disagree I think if it can be generally accepted amongst the majority of the living population that something is reprehensible then it should probably be illegal. Showcasing children being raped is generally considered disgusting by most sane people even if those children aren’t real individuals

you can't call something child abuse when there's no child

You can if it has the potential to cater to real pedophiles and encourage them towards worse tendencies, it doesn’t matter if it’s just one basement dweller masturbating or not. The impact it’s having on society is the same.

If Westy wasn’t arrested we’d just be teaching the people that this thing is acceptable, which would make even more rape simulators flood the market.

Do you really want your children to live in a world where they can buy child rape simulators on Xbox Live or the PS5 Network?
If you do, and you think “muh free speech” is a reasonably excuse as to why, you’re fucking retarded sorry

I’m genuinely curious, if you could buy Proud Father for the Xbox and your children were being exposed to that, would you be okay with it? Because it sounds like you would be and that you think free speech gives you a free ticket to be disgusting when it was never intended to do that at all

Sounds like it’s mostly based on horror or creepy themes and isn’t solely a child rape simulator, and for reasons discussed above some genres may be considered generally acceptable for those reasons
Violence is not generally restricted in video games the way animated CSAM is

is murder a generally accepted thing amongst the majority in australia or am i missing something?

What’s pathetic is openly advocating for legalised child molestation simulators to be available to the public, but I shouldn’t be engaging with you anyway

Yeah most people are fine with horror movies and fictional violent media

The fact that you genuinely think a violent movie or video game is comparable to a simulator designed to arouse you by showing you non consenting children being abused is ridiculous
Free speech doesn't mean you get to be an idiot

Do you really want your children to live in a world where they can buy child rape simulators on Xbox Live or the PS5 Network?

i want to live in a world where parents take responsibility for their children's development and access to media instead of handing that responsibility off to global mega corporations whose sole interest is maximizing profit

You wanting anyone to impose authority on fiction is more harmful to society than a pedo consuming fiction.
Very straight-forward, try not to get confused.

the argument can just as easily be made that having access to fictional content actually LESSENS the chance that a person will go out ant attempt to cause real harm, since they instead have a victimless outlet for those feelings.
and no, kids have never been able to buy M rated games and the like, bad argument
as for adults, absolutely yes, free speech does apply to works of fiction, even ones you or i may find icky and gross

Free speech was advocated by men that told the king to go fuck himself in a nation built out of the unwanted misfits of the world.
The entire point of free speech is to preserve freedom even when others would rather you not have it.
Even were it not this is still dystopian.

Avoids the question with a bunch of bullshit

I mean it was a yes or a no answer but sure. You either think it should be available for public consumption or you don’t.
Sounds like you think it should be on the shelves at Walmart though hey?
Bit stupid if you ask me

If we lived in your world, as soon as you walk into Walmart it would be aisles upon aisles of nothing but child abuse simulators ready for purchase and legal ownership.
Full, unmoderated access and unrestricted trade. Am I wrong?
That’s what you want.

A world where child rape abuse simulators are sold en masse.

Now take a step back and realize how fucking stupid you sound.

IMG_1382.jpg - 640x356, 13.15K

I hope all shotaloli content will be banned. Ban it worldwide. We must resist evil. GO TO PRISON YOU PEDOS.

Hello welcome to Game Stop this is your fantasy land in your mind where you can buy all the child rape simulators you could ever want because you’re a dirty little rat

And now back to reality dickhead

IMG_1383.jpg - 461x360, 41.46K

actual fucking super hero

it's all cringe blender scenes using character models ripped from sims4 or something

What the actual fuck are the coddled creature retards that make up the australian government? Are they even human?

NTA. It is and it does actually. Nothing ridiculous here aside from that dual standard.

right, just like legal porn is already on every shelf at walmart right now, and hentai games are front and center at every game stop.

do yourself a favor, take a step back and take an objective look at the ridiculous level of mental gymnastics you're going through. you sound fucking crazy

I will 100% devote my life to ending all humanity if we reach that point. I think I can manage it. The technology is there.

imagine building and profiting off a murder simulator, that would be crazy

Imagine going to jail for 10 years for your cringy perverted child sex fantasies
Aus gov is fucking based

The dumb bitch deserves to be locked up for that shit.

irrelevant link. absolutely nobody here is claiming that it is acceptable to try and meet up with children on the internet. we're talking about jacking it to drawings, not throwing kids into vans. good job attacking a position nobody is defending.

I mean it was a yes or a no answer but sure.

if you want a simple, socially acceptable answer to your questions, try ChatGPT
it will coddle your lil noggin

You either think it should be available for public consumption or you don’t.

lots of things are available for public consumption that people (especially children) shouldn't consume
i look forward to your vigorous campaign against liquor stores, cannabis dispensaries, pornography, processed foods, violent media, trash TV, the Jehovah's Witnesses, and a whole host of other things that are objectively harmful but that you accept as inevitable because you haven't really put any thought into your philosophy

Am I wrong?

nearly everything you think is wrong

absolutely nobody here is claiming that it is acceptable to try and meet up with children

I bet you think you should be able fuck children because of free speech too, right?

liquor stores, cannabis dispensaries, pornography, processed foods, violent media, trash TV

99% Of people love all of that shit
Nobody likes a child predator

hey guys, fucking kids is bad and we all agree on that

HURR you sound like you think fucking kids is GOOD

so are you like, EXTRA retarded or what?

so if pedophilia becomes more popular, it will be okay?

there's no child, and there's no predator, what the fuck are you even talking about

thinks fucking kids is bad

thinks people should be allowed to own a kid fucking simulator

Pick one genius

But pedophilia isn’t popular, is it?
It might be to you because you’re a childless virgin, but to almost every sane human on the planet it’s not and never will be

You are the predator

thinks shooting people is bad

plays video games

watches TV

guess you're a hypocrite now, welcome to the club

thinks murder and other crimes are bad

thinks people should be allowed to own GTA V

Pick one genius

I just fucked all your imaginary daughters, what you gonna do?

genuinely imprisonable offense according to half the retards in this thread lmao

The second.

But pedophilia isn’t popular, is it?

how would you feel if you hadn't had breakfast this morning?

It might be to you because you’re a childless virgin, but to almost every sane human on the planet it’s not and never will be

1,000,000,000 Muslims follow a religion whose founder married a girl when she was 6 and deflowered her when he was 9

Still repeating the same bullshit

Incapable of reading a thread and constantly diverts to repeating the same point even though it’s been answered

Would you like it explained again?

Just being here talking about this on Anon Babble would be a crime if some had their way. The irony seems lost on most.

The Criminal Assets Confiscation Taskforce (CACT)

1.2 billion seized

Muslims follow a religion whose founder married a girl when she was 6 and deflowered her when he was 9

Oh you’re a Muslim child predator, it all makes so much sense now

has the same very simple concept explained to him several times by several people

still can't understand the difference between a drawing and a person

i'm sorry anon, there's an IQ requirement to participate in this conversation, you'll have to leave now

still thinks call of duty is the same as a child rape simulator

talking about his IQ

IMG_1392.jpg - 1242x1179, 506.69K

They were pointing out why citing popularity rings hollow. If all it takes for someone to have a different stance is popularity their opinion is probably worthless.

fictional depictions of acts that would be unacceptable if committed in real life, designed for harmless entertainment
the only difference is that you feel more strongly about one over the other if done in real life, but that's completely fucking irrelevant. all you have to do is not replicate the things you see in fiction. have you ever watched a movie where someone got shot, and then you DIDNT go shoot someone? it's the EXACT same concept. nobody would give you shit for watching a movie, they'd only be mad if you shot someone. just dont shoot people, and just dont touch kids. it's REALLY not difficult

the only difference is that you feel more strongly about one over the other

Well done for staying the obvious, yes.

Hence why one is illegal and one isn’t, because most people feel more strongly about one over the other

IMG_1393.jpg - 490x626, 31.91K

child rape

harmless entertainment

erm that’s debatable mister

Bro really thinks a child abuse simulator is “harmless entertainment” lmao
What the fuck is wrong with you?

IMG_1394.jpg - 541x567, 19.64K

feelings are not and should not be the determining factor in what is or is not allowed in a society
harmful acts should be illegal, harmless acts should be legal. your only other option is to either excuse harmful behavior, or to punish harmless behavior, neither of which are acceptable
there is no child, there is only a fictional character, therefore there is no victim and nobody gets hurt, therefore, harmless. unless you're trying to argue that you can "harm" a drawing, and that harming a drawing is morally equivalent to harming a child
personally, i think that's horribly dismissive of real victims of sexual abuse, by comparing their real trauma to something fake
you point out someone who is in any way harmed by some guy jerking off to a fictional character, and i'll change my stance, but i think we both know you can't do that, because there isn't one

You are speaking to those that have undergone a lifetime of indoctrination and let it do their thinking for them. No sane statement that contradicts that will ever open their eyes before it becomes the popular stance.

feelings are not and should not be the determining factor in what is or is not allowed in a society. harmful acts should be illegal, harmless acts should be legal.

You’re fucking retarded. People determine what is harmful and harmless based on how they feel about things.

there is only a fictional character

We’ve been through this

Fictional rape is harmless and no reasonable person would be likely to ever debate that truth without feeling contrarian or very bored.

Westoooo

Westoooooooooooooo

Westo, my booooy

Its fine to molest and rape children if it’s “fictional”

You sound like someone who needs to be fbi vanned asap I’m just saying

What a fucking king. What a chad. What a right bloke.

FREE WESTY

Child abuse in ANY form is not okay
Do you understand?

You are fucking weird

I am well aware you would like those who disagree with you to suffer. No need to tell me. Were you not that kind of person you would support liberty over the boot of a tyrant.

HNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGGG
Child pussy

harm is whatever people say it is

no, harm is objectively identifiable. you being offended by something doesn't make it harmful. it harming someone makes it harmful
honestly shocking how many people are out here who are just straight up incapable of objective, dispassionate decision making
a fictional child is not a child, and fictional characters cannot be abused, or harmed in any way. the term "child abuse" does not apply on either count.
child abuse is obviously bad, but it's also irrelevant to this issue
do you understand?

I support harming people that advocate for child molestation freedoms under the guise of free speech
You directly harm the cause you claim to be so passionate about (freedom) and I’m convinced pain and having your lives shattered is the only language you understand

You’re a retard

As far as I know abuse did not happen and no child was involved. I am concerned with the abuse of adults. The child that grew up and suddenly lost value in your eyes.

absolutely nobody here is advocating for child molestation. strawman argument

you being offended by something doesn't make it harmful. it harming someone makes it harmful

Yeah so if every human on the planet agrees that it’s harmful and child abuse survivors are saying it’s harmful then it’s probably harmful
But you’ll keep doing mental backflips to morally justify the fact that you jerk off to CSAM, and that’s fine
You’re addicted and have a problem

FREE WESTY!

nobody here is advocating for child molestation.

Yes you are. You’re saying the child molestation simulator should be legal and he shouldn’t have gone to jail.
That’s exactly what you’re advocating for, child molestation

You want it to be legal to simulate molesting a child and you want to encourage people to molest children

You would be wrong. I am a person who spent most of their childhood suffering greatly and monsters like you would have that be the entirety of my life because I am willing to call evil what it is. There is little doubt that you have more evil thoughts and desires in you than any of the people you look down upon. I do not wish the same horrors upon you despite this because I am not the narcissistic monster that you are.

FREE MY NIGGA WESTY!

Australians seethe when face to face with this
xvideos.com/?k=kitty jung

crocy d like ozzies are long dead or living in the bush like legends and don't bother going into the city except for things like death certificates

Current studies have shown that it doesn't make a difference and that there are pedos who are content with loli and will never harm a child while there are those who "just haven't had the right opportunity" and are essentially destined to assault a child at some point

Loli works in the sense where it provides an outlet that isn't CP so they can be an otherwise normal person in society

Show this 'game' to any adult, and they’ll call you a pervert and call the police. It’s that simple, folks. Ten out of ten people would call it horrifying. You are bad people. You don’t deserve to be free.

Kittt jung is putrid
You have garbage taste which makes sense since you jerk off to child rape games

This. Except they don’t want to believe it

I honestly don’t give a shit how much you suffer if you think raping and abusing children is okay

every human on the planet agrees that it's harmful

obviously they don't or we wouldn't be having this conversation.

if everyone agrees that something is bad, that makes it bad

no, group consensus does not alter objective fact. a spade is a spade, even if a billion people say it's not
do you guys seriously not understand that a fictional character is not the same as a real human being? are you genuinely incapable of understanding the difference? you can ABSOLUTELY argue that it's okay to fantasize about doing something bad, as long as you don't actually do it. they're not the same thing. it's like, really REALLY obvious that they're not the same thing.
i'l spell it out VERY simple for yall.
hurting a person is bad, because a person gets hurt
hurting a video game character is not bad, because a person does not get hurt
saying it is okay to hurt a video game character, does not mean you want to hurt real people, or that you want others to hurt real people.
honestly baffling how much trouble people are having separating fiction from reality, and understanding that different rules apply to each
just don't hurt people. video game characters aren't people. it really is that simple

They got put into camps during covid dude there are so many other ways that they are cucked which is crazy because they are descendants of criminals and its like they are in a prison

Remember Loli Licker 64?
Weird name cause there was very little licking and alot of dicking

No lmao I saw the screenshots of this guys stuff I would never play that cursed cgi shit

obviously they don't or we wouldn't be having this conversation.

Sorry you’re right forgive me. Theres the 0.00001% that are freaks like you that think it’s acceptable

They got put into camps during covid dude there are so many other ways that they are cucked which is crazy because they are descendants of criminals and its like they are in a prison

You’ve been reading too many Fox News articles anon

IMG_1395.jpg - 768x341, 33.85K

The thread is about a man who had their life destroyed over making a video game. That is and remains the topic.
Outside of fiction or for people that are into it I am not a proponent of rape and I think abuse should be reserved for assholes and evil people. You did not know this because you did not care. You wanted to hate others and be unkind and so you did and were. That is what I oppose. I oppose abusers like you both when children and adults are involved and you don't like that. I am done here.

Current studies have shown that it doesn't make a difference and that there are pedos who are content with loli and will never harm a child while there are those who "just haven't had the right opportunity" and are essentially destined to assault a child at some point

Even if that’s the case I still think the game should be illegal

The thread was made to determine whether it was right or wrong for the cops to fuck his life up, and it was quickly determined that Westy was a piece of shit who 100% deserved what he got. A few child simulation addicts like yourself struggled to agree with that, and that was about the end of it. The end.
The thread is now about you, and why you think it’s okay to jerk off to generated children

FREE WESTY!

I think the main issue was it was 3d if it wasn't 3d it definitely would of been ignored

If we don’t draw the line here, they’ll be fucking children in VR next

IMG_1396.jpg - 452x678, 44.85K

next

anon. this is old news and has been done already
they even make fleshlights that connect ot the games and tighten up and release more lube automatically

Aussie

didn't read, bye

Aus gov is fucking based

You're trying way too hard to fit in lmao

I agree 3d should be illegal it gets way to close to irl before you know it there be hyperrealistic modles that you can tell the difference and that will make people blur the line

FREE WESTY NOW!

I bet you think child sex dolls are perfectly fine too

I’m older than you

IMG_1398.jpg - 479x473, 30K

No its creepy af and more on the side of something a "future child molester waiting for his chance" would do
I prefer my lolis to be 2D with some development and not perfectly flat
Basically I like petite women with a tight, small, but shapely body
I also like curvy women, and tall women, and fit women, and women with huge tits, and milfs
You get the point.

NTA. No sane person that wanted to "Protect kids." would oppose them. Literally not one sane person.

Literally not one sane person

Ok

IMG_1400.jpg - 1242x2115, 832.43K

FREE WESTY!
FREE DOLLFAG!

this'll show him!

"I'm older than you"

Are you sure? That's embarrassing to act like that if you are.

BEGONE AUSSIE SHILLS

nigga botta lose he foot to the beetus

Free Westy

You can see him in 2035

That in no way refutes what was said and there is no reasonable way to do so. Its an objective fact. If you don't want adults fucking kids you either support sex dolls or you are crazy. That is all there is to it.

Ok. Multiple countries and most sane people disagree with you

No sane person disagrees with that and most of humanity is ran by loonies. You literally cannot be sane and oppose it.

most of humanity is ran by loonies

Please do some reflecting, you are a pedophile special snowflake who thinks he’s smarter than everybody when you’re actually just an outcast one step away from a straight jacket for the protection of those around you

Enters full crazy mode.

Who would have ever guessed?

You’re obsessed with child pussy and it’s disgusting
You are disgusting

Premium or regular?

animated children

that shouldn't be illegal

That is what you say but all I see is "Look at ME! I am completely insane!"

You think Walmart should sell virtual reality child abuse similators?
Really?

depends on the boy's ass
regular: meh, I'll stick it in
premium: hngg

it's up to Walmart

FREE WESTY!

You’re a fucking idiot
You just said it should be legal which means YOU want it to be at Walmart

everybody I don’t like is a pedo

westy aint getting out for a long time
His kids much safer now

IMG_1402.jpg - 1242x2070, 896.12K

Bro stop trolling so hard. Touch grass.

Westy is getting ass fucked in the shower
It’s rape simulator 2.0 except it’s real and it’s Alec’s ass for the next 10 years instead of a loli

IMG_1403.jpg - 640x360, 20.02K

Screw the children

That's kind of the whole idea, isn't it?

Figuratively and fictionally anon. IRL is a whole other conversation.

He had real shit too so fuck him.

IMG_2271.jpg - 1290x1915, 484.51K

what a piece of shit

Australia

Absolute clown country.
Imagine having your life ruined by the government because you made a video game.

FREE!
WESTY!

Bullshit. What does "involving real children" mean? That could be as vague as having a Shadman drawing, or writing about some kids you found cute in a journal.

We should ban violent and racist videos games and movies, and ban sexist music. Being a bit naughty should be a death sentence. I love the government.

aussies. nuff said

Retards, not Aussies. And moralfags.

is there a difference?

so you take issue with fictional rape, but you find real life rape not only acceptable, but something to be celebrated

I noticed the irony there too.

I used to be just like you
I thought it was all rigged

Imagine having your life ruined by the government because you made a video game.

Deserved it. He also had real child porn.
Involving real children means he had real child porn. Not just the game.

You don't know that.

Yes they do, it was published in the article. The feds confiscated his computer and found 1300 game related files in addition to media of real children

You’re an idiot
You’re defending actual legitimate pedophiles lmao

130,000 game related files**
And child porn

THEY PUBLISHED CHLID PORn IN AN ARTICLE??!??!??!??!?

actual legitimate pedophiles

Allegedly, where's the proof?

He had real shit too so fuck him.

I'm not surprised.

Well the police aren’t going to show you the child porn are they Einstein

They could describe it more specifically, but they merely said "'abuse' material involving real children." That could mean anything.

What do you think it means?

look at this freakshow defending his kin

He wants the cops to give him a highly detailed description or “evidence” of the child abuse material otherwise he doesn’t believe it’s real child porn lmao
He’s trying to reverse psychology the cops into showing him CSAM

Nice argument you got there- Oh wait. There is none.

FREE WESTY!

Rape Westy!

Ban Loli and shota!

then they should have fucking led with that

If you're into lolisho game content, then you must be into real-life stuff too. Mark my words.

lolisho

I know what you are, anon.

Who?

It was better telling you after you’d spent ages defending the guy and telling us how his loli game was going to apparently “prevent real offending”

false pretenses

truly a master of the conversational arts

I mean if you just read the article to begin with…

IMG_1409.gif - 500x281, 1.77M

And I think you should be gassed. Doesn't matter.