do you think leftists are scared to watch opinion pieces that may not agree with their political views, but rightists are willing to watch anything and if they don't agree with it they'll just laugh and call them retarded?
Do you think leftists are scared to watch opinion pieces that may not agree with their political views...
To some extent.
It's rather funny to have watched "liberals" turn into closed minded and moralistic assholes over the last couple of decades.
No, I don't think that. I think your described actions of "rightists" (whatever that means) is what most sane people do, and the description you gave for "leftists" (lol) applies to all extremists.
Youre retarded
citation: postal 2
who burns the books again?
No. Basically the hatred spiral is set up by the elites and it sadly doesn't take much pot stirring to catalyze it.
We have a fundamental problem in human psychology that we assume that everyone, largely, thinks similarly to us. That couldn't be further from the truth, and even if we logically understand that and have internalized it, that's only as good until you turn the ignition in your car, drive off, and off the hypnotic trance land you go where you *feel* and *intuit* everything...
So... 99/100... you'll hear a guy say some shit... you think he said that shit to offend you... you don't stop, take a second, ask the guy to clarify what exactly he said, and if you did? Again, 99/100 they'd clarify and you'd have found out that they didn't actually have any beef with you at all, they just didn't quite think their thought through before they vocalized it. But you didn't do that. You're hypnotically tranced out when it happens. So instead you retaliate against the perceived aggression. The other guy all of a sudden feels attacked because you did attack him, and so he feels justified in retaliating back because he didn't stop to ask you what you really meant and why you said the thing you said.
... and yeah. The hatred spiral.
You throw other humans into the mix? Well then a guy is attacking a 2nd guy because a 3rd guy said something to him and the 3rd guy might be affiliated with or resemble the 2nd guy, but the 3rd guy isn't here, or is hard to directly attack, and so he's attacking 2nd guy as his personal punching bag, and 2nd guy isn't stopping, asking clarification for why guy is attacking him, and instead just retaliates which creates another hatred spiral.
Hatred spirals upon hatred spirals.
And when you tucker out, the elites smile as they sell you all bread and circuses and another day of nothing meaningful getting done. But boy oh boy, you sure told that guy. Really told them, boy howdy.
being close-minded to close-mindedness makes you a moralistic asshole
seethe
Books like Mein Kampf should be burned
The societal cost is too great, because if a book like that can still circulate that means people can still speak freely.
No, they should be studied. When history is ignored it repeats itself, just look at the willfully stupid americans.
Okay retard
failure to rebut is tacit concession
belly laughing rn
Here's a rebuttal: burn all the commercial copies of the book, and archive one official copy, for official research purposes.
how about just a little information suppression, as a treat?
cant believe it took that guy ten minutes to come up with that lmfaoolomfaol
not a rebuttal, retard
I think the vocal minorities on both sides are. That's why they're called radical extremists.
restating information suppression is wrong isn't a rebuttal
it is if you're literate
Too bad your not.
Seethe about what? When I was young liberals were the cool open minded people. Now they're the stodgy moralistic closed minded people.
Why would I seethe about that? You turned into what conservatives were like in the 1980s, just with a different morality.
Government should be able to tell be what they can read. No wrongthink allowed.
Authoritarians like you are absolute scum. Your sort are the reason the Bolsheviks and the Nazis gained power. Servile authoritarian scum.
Yep, they’re the insufferable fundamentalist killjoys they used to oppose.
Happily authoritarian when it comes to pushing n*zi beliefs.
The problem is who gets to decide what’s a “Nazi” belief.
Hitler was a n*zi. That's a fact.
Hitler is dead and nowadays you can be called a Nazi simply for saying a man in drag isn’t a woman.
that's true according to chatgpt
bawww people are so close minded about my bigotry
sucks to suck ya soppy vagina
institute of sexology in berlin was the third reich's first book burning target, some of the first sex change operations were done there
This is why you lose.
yeah imagine how realistic our neo-vaginas would be by now if he didn't set us back 100 years
So in other words the Nazis did something right? Hitler was also a vegetarian and non-smoker, I guess that makes all vegetarians Nazis too.
anything is possible when you grant your own premise
thailand has you covered
You should stretch before reaching that far
Face it, anyone can be called a “Nazi” nowadays for any stupid reason including normal opinions like “homosexuals shouldn’t get to groom kids in public schools.”
I think you're a retarded rightoid.
anyone can use words to say what they want
and you want to supress that
Other way around, I don’t think we can suppress “Nazi” speech without suppressing everything else. Freedom of expression needs to be unrestricted.
Free speech requires ordinance against the suppression of free speech