Ha, basically judges will no longer be able to stop the regime from doing whatever the fuck it wants...

Ha, basically judges will no longer be able to stop the regime from doing whatever the fuck it wants... that's to say: kiss your guns goodbye mags and pray to gurd there's nothing the administration does (especially w/o don ('cause he has a decade of lif give or take a few years, tho, even at present, his mental acuity leaves something to be desired)) that you don't disagree with because voicing your criticism will almost certainly get you sent to libya or south sudan or some shit.

newsweek.com/hidden-provision-trump-bill-court-2075769

Welp yall, it's been real... REAL DUMB
youtube.com/watch?v=HsM_VmN6ytk

Untitleddd.png - 301x310, 131.75K

Trump is pro gun you retard, Kamala was the one planning to take guns away within 90 days of being elected.

Many of the biggest acts of gun control happened under Republicans. For example the Firearm Owners Protection Act under Reagan. Conservatives always let their guard down when a Republican is president.

The reason you can't buy a new machine gun anymore is because of Reagan.

this thing will happen

Just like Kamala will win without being the nominee?
Just like Russia will lose the war?
Just like the vax is safe and effective?
Just like genital mutilation should be normalized?
Just like Trump will go to prison?

Get real.

you forgot martial law on the day after the inauguration and economic collapse

Deport every illegal.

Not gonna happen

How do you figure? He's the only president that has actually taken people's guns.

We'll start with you. No due process means you have no recourse.

What's the point of these threads?

To run conservatives noses in the fact that they elected a dictator who's actively dismantling the government.

posts the same meme for 4 months in a row

The state of the democrap party

it's so short sighted to keep pushing to change the presidency into an untouchable monarchy because when a democrat becomes president then you will legitimately have something to cry about.

monarchy

when a democrat becomes president

This perfectly sums up your total inability to use logic. A monarchy does not have political parties. In the fantasy world in your mind where the US becomes a "monarchy" that would imply no transition of power outside of a family lineage.

You're an absolute moron.

Trump, during his first term is the president who said, "Take the guns first, due process later".

MAGA keks cant help but lie to protect the boot they are licking. Trump does not care for any of the amendments in the Constitution, he wants absolute power, and he wants it now.
youtube.com/watch?v=yxgybgEKHHI

He wasn't talking about the country's guns, the context was illegally owned guns in a specific situation.

On Feb 7 Trump signed an executive order which has already had the effect of deregulating automatic conversion parts for multiple platforms. You can already see people using automatic conversions with impunity with no FFA interference all over social media and at ranges. The obvious reality beyond your soundbite propaganda is that Trump has already achieved more for the 2nd amendment supporters than anyone in recent history.

Gun violence, restraining orders

He's asking about guns belonging to known violent criminals you absolute troglodyte

people who own guns illegally should have their weapon confiscated without needing to show up to court

yes

ORANGE MAN BAD REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Libs are so toast

On Feb 7 Trump signed an executive order which has already had the effect of deregulating automatic conversion parts for multiple platforms. You can already see people using automatic conversions with impunity with no FFA interference all over social media and at ranges. The obvious reality beyond your soundbite propaganda is that Trump has already achieved more for the 2nd amendment supporters than anyone in recent history.

But that's all tangible and real, liberals aren't interested orange man is always bad

Now it's due process never

literally the only thing the dems have left are blatant lies

How are you this insufferable

guns belonging to known violent criminals

Good luck trying to prove you're not a violent criminal without due process, friendo

I'll just reply to myself repeating the same words over and over while my "arguments" are destroyed

This is why you lost every single swing state.

And what do you think happens when all your guns are made illegal as per an executive order signed by Trump like his bump stock ban?

Anon, you can be thrown in jail without charges and that's how most crime is handled, the due process always comes later. The situation in the clip you shared was concerning people who had committed violent crimes who would have access to firearms which is a process that is normal in most places, the person asking Trump the question wanted more support for situations that were already common.

Just saying "due process" is not an argument. Facts matter.

By being a political cultist. That's how

trump will suddenly do cartoon villain tier things because I said so

Just like Kamala will win without being the nominee?
Just like Russia will lose the war?
Just like the vax is safe and effective?
Just like genital mutilation should be normalized?
Just like Trump will go to prison?

*most violent crime

I didn't share any clip, and you keep missing the point.
You're not the one deciding who has committed violent crimes, due process is.
Without due process, you'll stay in jail, crying you are innocent until someone reinstates habeas corpus again, or you die there.
Choose where to be when that happens.

You're not the one deciding who has committed violent crimes, due process is.

The officers arresting are. Due process determines if that assumptions was correct. You are absolutely gobsmacked, please stop pretending you don't have brain damage.

You couldn't be more wrong if you tried.

He's been doing cartoon villain shit. Do you not get the news in Bumfuck?

Due process determines if that assumptions was correct

Except that you don't get due process anymore.

He's been doing things the majority of the country wants and you happen to be offended by. That's all.

Any logical arguments to be made or will you continue to be emotional?

gets proven wrong

well akchually nothing is real

Typical lib

The officers arresting are

Being judged on the spot by lardasses with gun hard-ons who get 9 months of training in total

I'll go around telling that and sperging like it's a good thing

You're still better off supporting due process instead of licking boots, really, it's still the best alternative.

w-w-well drumpf le bad b-b-because he's gonna take your guns just watch!

lmfao
shouldn't you guys be formulating policies or trying to find leadership? you're just digging yourselves deeper

That's not true at all. You aren't even denying that he's cartoon villain shit. He's openly violating the Constitution and ignoring Supreme Court rulings.

kiss your guns goodbye!

n-nevermind part of the Big Beautiful Bill includes removing silencers from the NFA

haha they will totally take ur guns! while giving back silencers!

>gets proven wrong

Oh you think you'll be arguing with memes and shitposts when they come and take you to El Salvador just because they decided so?
Good luck, you will need lots of it.

You didn't prove anyone wrong. You don't get due process. What happens now That you're in jail.

Point 1: Basic logic says what I said is true regardless of the reasons you gave. This indicates you either cannot internalize or deduct what other people say.

Point 2: If he violated the constitution he would be impeached. Full stop. So either come back when you've submitted articles of impeachment to your congressman and they're brought to the house or stop lying.

Are you illiterate?

My argument is EVERYTHING will be lawful without due process, even cops buttfucking you.
Especially cops buttfucking you, in fact.
Try proving them wrong then.

Neither of those things are true. How stupid are you? He's said he's not going to comply with the Supreme Court ruling. That means he's violating the Constitution. You do know that the Supreme Court decides what is and isn't constitutional, right?

You quasicucks actually think going to jail means you're not getting out in hours unless you committed violent crime. You're complete idiots. People get arrested all the time without being charged and it's completely legal. If their crime was violent, you wouldn't allow them access to weapons until they were found not guilty.
This isn't something you can leverage to "take people's guns"

only has ad hominem

im right because (no reason given)

he said

Lmao absolutely pathetic. Vax is safe and effective amirite?

my argument is this imaginary thing will happen in the future

Nice, see you in reality where nothing you say happens happens.

Do you understand what due process is? That means going to court to prove your guilt or innocence. When you're sitting there in jail and you don't get your due process then you don't get a trail or a sentence. You're just in jail for an indeterminate amount of time.

You don't even understand what the Supreme Court does? You aren't American.

When you're sitting there in jail and you don't get your due process then you don't get a trail or a sentence. You're just in jail for an indeterminate amount of time.

this absolute mongoloid doesn't know how bail works

Jfc man just stop

You don't get bail, moron. Bail is set by a judge as a part of due process. You're just in jail. That's it.

please attack my strawman

Articles of impeachment are drawn up in Congress. If Trump committed treason, then by all means work with your rep and you'll be a hero. If you're right.

in the future of my imagination judges wil lcease to exist

This is why you lost every single swing state, the governor's majority, the house, the senate and the supreme court.

So your argument is that because he hasn't been impeached yet he hasn't done anything unconstitutional even though he is violating the rulings of the Supreme Court? You are a special kind of stupid.

Wow, you really don't understand how due process works, do you?

Not my argument at all. What I said is true. My argument is that he hasn't violated the constitution. You are the one who is arguing the extreme position without any evidence. My position is the normative one that is represented by reality.

imaginary

Yeah, sure, there are people already unlawfully sent, jailed and probably already dead in a spic shithole and you think the same thing won't happen to you because...?

I'm willing to bet you are also one of those who always said "the gubbermint is evul and out to get me" and now you're swallowing even the most over the top shit because there's a felon who speaks the same as you at the white house.

You know what? I'm beginning to think you actually crave that buttfucking.

keeps replying without saying anything after being proven wrong

Salty?

Then you don't understand the function of the Supreme Court because you're not American.

won't happen

my argument is hypothetical things that will happen because I said so

Vax = safe and effective?

You haven't proven anyone wrong. All you've done is demonstrate that you have no idea how due process works or why it's a bad thing that Trump wants to get rid of it.

you're wrong but I won't say why and I'll keep replying after you proved me wrong

Lol

We've been telling you why. You can be jailed for any reason for any amount of time with no recourse. No bail. No trial. No sentencing. You're just in jail. That's why due process is important.

unless you committed violent crime

Yeah sir, I swear, I've seen it with my own eyes and my partner Officer McBoot can testify, Anon was committing violent crimes while also raping babies and -gasps- voting Dems.

Enjoy your forever jailtime.

how dare the president use his constitutional powers exactly as they're written

Lmao hey libs, the Constitution explicitly says he can do everything he's doing. The only thing he needs congressional approval for is technically budget items

Cry harder that Republican democracy is working as intended by the founders

If he violated the constitution he would be impeached. Full stop.

You really are that clueless. Let me guess, you still think that if he goes too far it will hurt the GOP in the midterms?

You can be jailed for any reason

Enjoy your forever jailtime

In the jail of your imagination lmao

I mean, feel free to cry it will never happen, you'll cry harder when it's you being shipped over the border because you looked funny I guess.
You're simping for the safety nets to be removed after all.

my totally organic unrelated question designed to change the subject after I was proven wrong

Wrong.

my entire argument is that this thing will happen that hasn't happened

Sorry anon but I'm not a religious nut

All you've done is prove that you don't understand how due process works or why it's important.

provides evidence

a-a-a-akshually wrong

This is why you lost every single swing state.

Where does it say he can stop payment to government agencies and not follow court decisions?

Take it up with the Supreme Court, champ.

What was I wrong about?

1000004966.png - 1080x808, 554.33K

U.S. hasn’t had political parties in 30+ years.
Holy shit. Wake the fuck up.

Found the Republican

he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.

Try reading. SCOTUS rules the only thing he can't do is end those agencies started by congress. 99% of government agencies are not started by congress.

the Laws be faithfully executed

So he explicitly cannot ignore the orders of judges. You just proved yourself wrong, Hoss.

supreme court says I'm right

Yet nobody is impeaching trump so I'd rather trust the supreme court than your opinion

so I'd rather trust the supreme court

That means that you agree that Trump is violating the Constitution. Do you think that the Supreme Court is the body responsible for impeachment?

This is a new level of pathetic.

Just in case that was too complicated for you, here it is in terms even a lib should be able to understand

oh no I got proven wrong by a person and then by one of the most advanced LLMs with realtime internet access to all historical law filings, news and content on the entire web

LMAAAAAOOOO
libs are so fucking COOKED

You really shouldn't let AI do your thinking for you. It's not a repository of information.

completely folds

We know you have no arguments and no facts, lib. Now you do, too.

I really hope you're trolling.

This is for all the faggot nigger-lovers, you know who you are.

leftcant.jpg - 636x658, 75.83K

you have no arguments and no facts

posts garbage from grok

I argued my point first, then when you acted like a child when ai made my argument I proved my points with a mediator.

I won. Your argument failed. Your position is a lie.

You have to be trolling.

posts garbage

Ok so show us all the supreme court case where Trump was found guilty of violating the Constitution mongoloid

Every single one of my replies has addressed a specific logical inconsistency with your process. Even this one. You on the other hand are repeating emotional quips in a feedback loop. It's pretty obvious based on this dynamic that the earlier point I made is right and your point I disproved is wrong.

the supreme court case where Trump was found guilty

Did you drop out or are you a foreigner? Civics is required in all US high schools.

If you aren't trolling then you must have brain damage.

Sounds cool. Reminds me of Palpatine slowly assuming control of the Republic. Always liked a good political takeover story. Long live the Empire!

supreme court case where Trump was found guilty of violating the Constitution

The case you're referring to can never find Trump guilty of anything because it's an injunction. Funny your article didn't mention that. You're completely clueless and eating up propaganda and loving it.

scotusblog.com/cases/case-files/a-a-r-p-v-trump/

gets proven wrong

ad hominem

Typical

The Supreme Court doesn't find people guilty, moron. They decide what is and isn't unconstitutional. If they say it's unconstitutional and you say that you're going to do it anyways then you are violating the Constitution. You cannot be American and not know this. It's a required class in high school.

You're completely clueless and eating up propaganda and loving it.

Ironic

The case made in the filings you're both ugly crying over is in picrel. I actually read the filings unlike you clueless morons who want news articles with sensational headlines. Habeas corpus is not at risk, Trump hasn't done anything unconstitutional according to any SCOTUS case. It's all hypothetical stretching under the assumption orange man bad. Similar situations have happened in the past with far less media fanfare.

Your leaders are crying over a nothingburger yet again

You have lost the plot and are talking about something completely unrelated. You don't understand what the Supreme Court does which means you are not American and you can be ignored. Stay mad, Moshi.

the prosecution's only mention of constitutionality in their entire filings is "completely unrelated"

My argument proves itself evident yet again based on the facts, and you have no counter.

prosecution

There is no prosecution in the Supreme Court. You do not know how the Supreme Court works because you are not American. Die mad, Coen.

Sorry, "prosecutor" since a prosecutor wrote up the filing presented by Justice Alito. My point was obvious.
You continue to have no counter argument and only insults.

There is no prosecutor. There is no defense. Nobody is found guilty. That's not how the Supreme Court works and you would know that if you were American. Fuck off, Goldstein.

My exact words were:

Ok so show us all the supreme court case where Trump was found guilty of violating the Constitution

So you are now suddenly pretending agreeing with me is helping your position. Trump did nothing unconstitutional.

supreme court case where Trump was found guilty

That's not how the Supreme Court works, Horowitz. You'd know that if you were American.

Exactly. And there is no mention of the constitutionality in any of the filings besides the passage I provided.

You lost, and you're racist.

there is no mention of the constitutionality

The Supreme Court only rules on the constitutionality of rulings from lower courts. You would know this if you were American. Stay in Israel, Schwartz.

You do realize England wasn't invaded in WWII

calling people jews now instead of russians when you lose arguments?

lose arguments

That's hilarious coming from the Jew who doesn't understand how the Supreme Court works. I'm a jingoist and you're from a country controlled by a self installed dictator who has been proven to use professional trolls on this site. You can stop posting now, Weiss.