"Warmest day on record." Records kept for the last 150 years.*
Yeah, ok bro.
"Warmest day on record." Records kept for the last 150 years.*
recorded(also modern) history is better than guesstimates?
good point. I haven't heard about the "Climate Crisis" in months, it seems.
and it makes me wonder
Why tho? When for millions of years, CO2 had fuck all to do with Earths temps?
As if tree rings, fossil records and ice cores are so wildly inaccurate. Nice try.
wildly inaccurate
They are not comparable to direct observations
Only the evidence that supports your climate hysteria matters. Just discard the rest and pretend the IPCC hasnt been manipulating temperature data to make the past look colder than it was, even though they've been caught doing so repeatedly.
Cool story bro. Nice dismissive hand waving.
In b4 "but what about CFCs bro? Those prove AGW, bro.
Nice dismissive hand waving.
Not really anon, I'm merely pointing to the fact that extrapolations and observations are not the same.
Yeah those pesky carbon-14 atoms are known for lying. LoL.
LOl, this dipshit thinks what people put out can compare with the power of the sun and astronomical cycles.
i have changed camps on this issue if the sun is in 257 year cycle than an upward trend seems right and i would expect the amplitude of the wind systems around the equator to go up pushing the trailing bands or eddies to shift as well.
Wrong assumption, my guy. Was mocking a guy from a thread a few days ago.
We both know the sun determines earths climate followed at close second by volcanic activity and CO2 isnt in the top 10 as its weak sauce at best.
If you cared about the climate then you would look up explanations for all of these things. All of it has been well studied and explanations are readily available to the layman. You didn't and won't because you treasure your ignorance. Prove me wrong. Look it up.
You can get temperature observations from carbon-14 atoms?
Even methane is 10x stronger as an actual "greenhouse gas" and yet it only last 7 years on average and breaks down under UV light.
As for farming cows, that is carbon negative since fertilizing grass puts plenty of CO2 into the ground and the methane output is negligable as long as you feed them natural foods like grass and not fucking soybeans.
Cows did not fucking evolve to soybeans, lolz.
You are definitely retarded. This graph shows the global average temperature decoupling from the output of the sun.
As for farming cows, that is carbon negative since fertilizing grass puts plenty of CO2 into the ground
If you cared about the climate then you would look up explanations for all of these things. All of it has been well studied and explanations are readily available to the layman. You didn't and won't because you treasure your ignorance. Prove me wrong. Look it up.
What a lovely logical fallacy: appeal to authority.
Should I look up all of the bought and paid for "scientists" now or later? LoLz.
Nice cherry picking. Now explain the entire timeline where CO2 has fuck all to do with temps.
Cool story bro. But just like the other anon said, nice cherry picking.
You are the retarded one with that nicely cherry picked data. But solar irradiance and sunspots and temps correlate nicely, despite that manufactured bullshit cherry picking of yours.
Well if the government says it. it must be true. They wouldn't have anything to gain from this would they?
So you're saying that despite 1/2 of plants being undeground, when they die that doesnt put 1/2 of the CO2 they contain underground?
Congrats, you just flunked 8th grade earth science.
we're supposed to believe a jewish run government that hates us and leeches off us at every possible opportunity with no resistance is being honest about this one thing.
LoL just 2 weeks to flatten the curve.
This, there is absolutely FUCKING ZERO evidence the climate ever changed before we built factories, trains and cars. Whiteoids are the enemies of humanity.
FUCKING ZERO evidence the climate ever changed before we built factories, trains and cars.
TIL ice ages didnt happen.
when they die that doesnt put 1/2 of the CO2 they contain underground?
not really? if it gets buried, maybe? Anyways the use of even manure will release some hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, methane, and ammonia as it decomposes. It's better than synthesizing fertilizers, sure, but it certainly isn't "carbon neutral"
Its carbon negative but I wouldnt expect a lefty to admit it.
Just look at the earths history and watch the depleting supply of CO2. CO2 is heavier than air and over millions of years it sinks to the bottom of the ocean and into the ground.
Millions of years ago the atmospheric CO2 levels were above 9,000ppm and where did it all go? It went into the ground.
Humans are here to dig it all up and enrich the atmosphere with life giving CO2.
Think about it.
You don't get to talk about solar cycles because you discount science, so choose someing else; tea leaves or chicken bones maybe?
Its carbon negative
Not really anon.
CO2 is heavier than air and over millions of years it sinks to the bottom of the ocean and into the ground.
holy fuck, you're actually a retard.
I'll guess that you have no problem believing 2000yr old goat herder story scrolls are 100% real true facts, but think climatology is fake news
holy fuck, you're actually a retard.
CO2 is heavier than air and will sink to groud level in calm conditions.
sink to groud
or into ground?
but think climatology is fake news
LoL the gubbermint would never lie to me.
Have you gotten your latest covid booster? Lololololol.
By this logic, literally all gases should fall out of the atmosphere. Apparently you don't know about kinetic energy?
Both. CO2 is heavier than other atmospheric gases.
retard confirmed
Nice false equivalence. And its not that much heavier.
zero facts and logic. dumbocrat confirmed.
zero facts and logic
lmao, how ironic
Where did 9,000ppm CO2 go? Take your time.
If those are indeed "guesstimates", then how far off could they possibly be?
No u.
sad
Man if only earth was covered in organisms whose sole purpose is fixing atmospheric CO2 into organic compounds.
If only certain minerals when exposed to CO2 will capture it and form.csrbonate minerals over geologic time
Nice fake charts.
Seems like you're trying to push your narrative extremely hard.
lmfao exactly. trips of truth
Love that first chart with literally no y axis, and proper source for the data. Truly ExxonMobil is sending their best here
Someone must have a lot of money for the consensus to be so near unanimous among subject matter experts, and for not even one to whistleblow the funding scheme? Insanity is what you ask me to believe.
Yes. Yes you are. Because you've married yourself to ideas that you clearly do not fully understand and now you are a cheerleader for "science."
Every chart I do not like is fake.
Someone must have a lot of money for the consensus to be so near unanimous among subject matter experts
You've nailed it on the head. Now flip the coin over. That so called 97% consensus has been debunked.
"you married yourself to ideas you don't understand"
forgets about plants and mountains when asking where 9000 ppm went
consensus to be so near unanimous
forbes.com
Now tell us that Forbes is fake news. I dare you.
forgets about plants and mountains when asking where 9000 ppm went
Nope.
Thanks for admitting that I'm right though. I'm not always right and this isnt about my ego. IDGAF if I'm right or wrong I just want the truth.
And how exactly are you right about that?
Where did 9,000ppm CO2 go?
Why are atmospheric CO2 levels dropping over millions of years?
Why are all the climate alarmists only concerned with the last 400 years? Why not the whole history of Earth that shows depleting atmospheric CO2 levels?
Where did it go? The rocks and the biosphere.
And ignoring the massive uncertainty in estimates going past the Cambrian, in deep time the relation is complicated by the fact the sun was weaker in the past. The temperature on the planet wasn't dramatically higher in the Archean compared to the Phanerozoic because the Sun was just less powerful back then. Everything we know about solar evolution confirms this, and evidence for this exists in the rock record.
The rocks and the biosphere.
So it exited the atmosphere. You're getting there.
So there is no natural balance? No natural mechanism that resupplies atmospheric CO2? Interesting.
They dropped over billions of years because the Earth was going from a molten hellball to a thriving biosphere.
Climate scientists are actually concerned about changes over the last several 10s of thousands of years, or moreso the stability of climate across that timespan until around 200 years ago. The reason why they are so concerned with this is because A) We are currently alive during this, we aren't living 2 billion years in the past during those drops. B) the change in the present is occurring at a much more rapid pace than past changes. Pace matters when it comes to if life can adapt or not
And ignoring the massive uncertainty in estimates going past the Cambrian
Thats your problem. You're too stubborn to admit that atmospheric CO2 levels were much higher in the past. IDGAF about any errors. CO2 was higher in the past.
Where did it go? It exited the atmosphere. Just admit it so we can move forward.
They dropped over billions of years because
Because CO2 is heavier than other atmospheric gases and because plant life naturally puts CO2 underground.
There literally is. Again, part of this is the biosphere. In this case, as the sun warmed, life could draw more CO2 down and the planet could remain at a roughly constant temperature. Life could afford to take more at no cost to its own survival, and with the benefit of much more organic molecules.
There is natural balance, ExxonMobil doesn't factor into that though
Literally did. Poining out there are uncertainties isn't rejecting that, so why are you getting so butthurt about something I didn't say
There is natural balance.
Bullshit. There is plant life and plant life reduced atmospheric CO2 from 9,000ppm to just 350ppm.
No, it's not because CO2 is heavier. This has nothing to do with mass, it's geo and biochemistry.
Plant life CAN put CO2 underground while it lives, and if it is buried before it completely decomposes. If not, the carbon that built it's body will be returned to the atmosphere as it rots, which will include the below ground parts. Roots rot too
o why are you getting so butthurt
Cheap personal attacks ignored.
Facts: Earths CO2 levels were 9,000ppm in pre Cambrian times or whatever they called it.
Facts: Over millions of years the plant life on this planet has reduced atmospheric CO2 to just 350ppm.
Plants do not self regulate. They simply starve when they dont get enough food. CO2 is plant food.
Sorry, facts don't care about your feelings.
The world of 4 billion years ago has a different balance than the world of 1 thousand years ago. Shocking!
the carbon that built it's body will be returned to the atmosphere as it rots
Bullshit. Again the atmospheric CO2 levels were once 9,000ppm. Now they are 350ppm.
Where did the CO2 go? It didnt go back into the atmosphere.
Sorry, facts don't care about your feelings.
That is correct. And the fact is atmospheric CO2 went from 9,000ppm to just 350ppm. Where did all of the CO2 go? It must have gone somewhere.
Plants literally will self regulate, they aren't responseless air gluttons.
More to the point though, the bigger factors controlling plant growth are temperature and humidity. Again, it's almost like plants could draw down more CO2 as the sun became stronger over geologic time
bitches don't know bout my carbon cycle
britannica.com
Literally have told you, the biosphere and the rocks. Repeating your question doesn't change the answer.
Plants literally will self regulate, they aren't responseless air gluttons
Lies based on nothing.
Again atmospheric CO2 levels were once at 9,000ppm but are now at 350ppm. Where did all of the CO2 go?
Cheap name calling will not help you.
That's an awful amount of assumptions
Also why are you still using 350? CO2 concentrations reached 420 ppm in 2024
So you admit the CO2 left the atmosphere. Thanks for confirming the obvious truth.
And its you that has to live with your own assumptions. Now explain where 9,000ppm CO2 went.
See above.
Also lies? Do you know what life is? Life regulates EVERYTHING. If it didn't, it would have burnt out a long time ago and you wouldn't be here musing about it
if you don't understand why rising temperatures is bad, you don't really get to comment on it...
Literally wasn't denying this, I gave this answer at least 3 times now
Plants do not have brains. They do not stop eating as long as there is nutrients for them to eat. They do not plan for the future. There is no "universal consciousness" that guides them.
If it didn't, it would have burnt out a long time ago
Assumptions based on nothing. And yet here we are at the lowest CO2 levels in history. Saved only by human activity.
Plants literally do plan for the future, why do you think they even bothered to evolve multiple ways of storing energy within themselves (starches in tubers for instance)
You don't need a brain to self regulate, look at any single celled organism for proof of that.
How low do the atmospheric CO2 levels have to go before the plants begin to suffer? 350ppm? 300ppm?
They were depleting their own supply of food before the industrial revolution just happened to happen.
Plants literally do plan for the future, why do you think they even bothered to evolve multiple ways of storing energy within themselves (starches in tubers for instance)
You don't need a brain to self regulate, look at any single celled organism for proof of that.
And yet they can only store so much and they dont stop eating CO2 until they begin to starve.
Plants literally do plan for the future, why do you think they even bothered to evolve multiple ways of storing energy within themselves (starches in tubers for instance)
You don't need a brain to self regulate, look at any single celled organism for proof of that.
Thats like saying I can keep eating until my food stamps run out and then I can eat myself by losing fat and muscle while my body eats itself. Thats called starvation.
Nice try.
That's not what an appeal to authority is.
k
These are local average temperatures from Europe
You are talking about milankovitch cycles. Do you think climate scientists don't know about that?
Technically on the second one he's talking about the sun,.but the point still stands. You think climate scientists don't know about the sun? You think the same NASA that launches the satellites that measure the temperature of the Earth aren't also recording the energy from the sun?
Sure bro. The wind just stopped blowing for 400 fucking years. Ok.
I know the little ice age and the medieval warming period are both thorns in the sides of you climate screechers and you'd do anything to diminish these events. Its not gonna happen, bro.
You think climate scientists don't know about the sun?
I know climate scientists are humans that can be bought, bribed and paid for, just like covid-19 scientists.
Literally were regional level events not global, and more to the point, update your data man. You're like 20 years out of date. Get new material at least
Did someone bribe you to not take your meds today? you're telling me the side going AGAINST big oil is the side propped up by dark money? Alright lil bro
That's not true. Plants are carbon neutral. When they decompose the carbon they are made of returns to the atmosphere. The carbon dioxide concentration has been stable for thousands of years.
Literally were regional level events not global,
Sure, buddy.
The Thames river in England just fucking froze in the MIDDLE OF THE SUMMER, SEVERAL TIMES, but somehow it was fucking nice and toasty warm elsewhere.
Cool story bro.
Did someone bribe you to not take your meds today?
Cheap ad hominem attacks. Thats all you have.
Earths atmosphere used to be over 9,000ppm of CO2. Where did it go?
The globe doesn't revolve around Brits; get new data
He thinks the Northern hemisphere is the entire globe
You are a special kind of stupid aren't you.
We're cycling back to this again? Not gonna touch the fact that one of the most notorious "Big Money" groups (Big Oil) is against climate scientists and profit from the ignorance you peddle? What Big Pharma is bad but suddenly Big Oil is good?
England is not the whole world, you collosal retard.
"That's not global"
"What?! Hurr durr, what about this one time in England??!1"
Bullshit.
"Yes, plants do indirectly put CO2 into the soil, but not directly through the process of photosynthesis. Plants absorb CO2 from the atmosphere during photosynthesis and use it to build their roots, stems, and leaves. When plants die, decompose, or release organic compounds through their roots, some of the carbon they stored is released back into the soil and eventually, some of this carbon can be released back into the atmosphere as CO2."
England is not the whole world, you collosal retard.
The tradewinds never stop, nor does the Earth stop spinning. Nice try.
Look it up retard. You know what? I'll actually do it for you. Then you have to fuck off and learn.
You are talking about the soil carbon bank. Soil is also carbon neutral. Instead of being mad and ignorant you can look things up and learn. Then you'll just be mad.
No see, he's obsessed with the CO2 concentration of the Earth of 4 billion years ago, back when it was a molten hellworld and the Sun was a fraction the brightness of today.
It is you who is the colossal retard. Explain again how the tradewinds JUST FUCKING STOPPED for 400 years. TWICE.
I accept your concession.
Oh, that? He should just watch pbs or the discovery channel. They love making documentaries about that shit.
What do you think you're talking about?
he's obsessed with the CO2 concentration of the Earth of 4 billion years ago
Where did it go? Nice appeal to emotion btw, describing a flourishing and full of life world as a "hellworld."
If it was such a "hellworld" why was there so much flora and fauna?
Where did all that CO2 go? You're avoiding the question. Answer it directly.
Your mother. She obviously raised an idot. Thats not a typo.
He won't because they're funded by the Jews and big pharma. Ignore that all the propaganda being spewed about "CO2 is plant food and dangerously low" is literally bought by Big Oil
Watch discovery channel, dawg. They talk about that shit like every week.
Cool story bro.
Asking questions you dont like and cannot answer is always "propaganda."
For the 7th time, the biosphere and the rocks. Can't get more direct.
Also, no, the Earth during the Hadean wasn't flourishing. Do you know anything about what life on Earth was like back then? Or in the Archean?
It's already too late to stop it, anons. Take care!
So nothing. You're grasping at straws because you have no idea what you're talking about. Next question, where did you get this from?
Watch discovery channel, dawg.
Left wing nonsense. Funded by ActBlue just like PBS and MSDNC. Nice appeal to authority.
Lol
What about when companies spend billions of dollars to spread misinformation about their product? Is that propaganda?
For the 7th time, the biosphere and the rocks. Can't get more direct.
So you admit that CO2 is leaving the atmosphere by various mechanisms and it is not being naturally replenished. Thanks. At least you partially admit the truth.
Literally have answered your questions. Not liking or understanding the answer doesn't mean I didn't answer.
And yes, if your message is coming right from people who were paid off by Big Oil, that is propaganda. You talk a lot about the Big Pharma covid doctors, but haven't said a word about Big Oil
Lol what? You have to be trolling.
Shaddup and just take your 11th covid booster, lol.
Lol what? Everything I disagree with is trolling.
No, thank you. I don't support Trump.
You are an NPC
Again, acknowledges Big Pharma but not Big Oil. You're either a moron, a shill, or a schizo
He thinks the Earth is the same now as it was 4 billion years ago
Holy shit. Just watch a documentary.
350ppm CO2 is desperately low and the plants were close to starvation. Thank God for the industrial revolution so life can continue and thrive once again. Otherwise all of the CO2 would just keep sinking into the ground as there is no natural balancing mechanism and everything would slowly die.
We humans ARE the natural balancing mechanism. Go take a drive in your gas powered car so the plants can eat.
Nonsense.
So you support Biden who also recommended covid shots and boosters?
Yes I are just ones and zeros. Nice to meet you. Faggot.
Who spent one trillion (1,000,000,000,000) dollars on the vaccine? I'm good on the Trump vaccine, thank you.
Facts that you simply cannot refute. Dont blow a microchip there, homie. You might need it later.
Enjoy your cognitive dissonance.
420 ppm
Plant life has survived with 170 ppm
ignores decomposition and volcanoes
repackaged Big Oil propaganda with a Manifest Destiny/pseudo-religious spin
Moron shill or schizo, call it
The CDC and the NIH. Aka your government who would never lie to you. LoL.
Plant life has survived with 170 ppm
And what happens when even that is depleted? Industrial grow operations pump in extra CO2 during the winter so the plants dont starve and so they can keep their yields up.
170ppm is starvation for a plant in terms of CO2.
Nope. It was Trump with "operation warpspeed". I don't care how credible you try to make it. I'm not taking the Trump vaccine.
OK Google, which president implemented operation Warp Speed?
You presented your argument without evidence and so I can dismiss it without evidence. It's nonsense. Can you substantiate any of it?
Nor should you take the Trump or the Biden vaccine.
Remember when Biden tried to use OSHA to make the jab mandatory for all companies with 150 or more employees? Then the SCOTUS had to step in and shoot that shit down? Good times.
It rose by itself. That was 80k years ago dude. The plants were fine, minus the ones covered by ice, since again anyone who knows anything about plants knows temperature is a bigger limiter on plant growth
And what happens when even that is depleted
Can't happen. Study climatology.
I can refute 100% of the counterarguments in this thread that came with zero accompanying links.
No one should believe nothing about nothing.
You keep trying to make this about Biden. How much do you get paid per post?
It rose by itself.
CO2 simply defied physics and gravity. Excellent. Wunderbar!!!
Nonsense. That's another claim make without evidence that you won't substantiate.
flat earthers get the rope
Weird strawman, but ok.
I keep trying to make this about facts and logic. I notice you cannot refute anything thats been said.
Cool story bro.
Nice strawman.
Facts don't care about your feelings
Post nose.
I accept your concession.
Weird strawman, but ok.
No, not a strawman. CO2 is heavier than other atmospheric gases. Now make yourself look like a fucking idiot to everyone reading who already knows this by claiming otherwise.
Then it wouldn't defy physics would it? That's an even weirder strawman.
Nice cherry picking bro. But where did 9,000ppm of CO2 go?
Don't bother, dude things the most pressing factor drawing CO2 out of the air is gravity and not plants and minerals
Das juden play both sides. The democrats and the republican parties are both chock full of jews.
Watch any documentary. This is common knowledge.
If I have to say plants and rocks one more time I'm pulling a Columbine.
Also not cherry picking, I was showing that yes, CO2 reached 170 ppm and we're still fine, and that CO2 rose after that
That's stupid. Has he never heard of wind?
Post nose.
dude things the most pressing factor drawing CO2 out of the air is gravity and not plants and minerals
Nice strawman. But what I actually said is that its both gravity as CO2 is heavier than other atmospheric gases and it is also plants as they die with 1/2 of the plant underground and most of the CO2 stays underground as confirmed by left leaning Google AI that I already quoted previously.
CO2 reached 170 ppm
And the plants were starving until thankfully the humans intervened otherwise life would have suffered greatly.
not a strawman if everyone's saying it
we're sick of you flat earth bitches pushing oil company propaganda
That's stupid. Haven't you ever learned about the carbon cycle?
"Plants begin to starve and their photosynthesis slows significantly when CO2 levels drop below 200 ppm. At about 150 ppm or less, many plants will die of CO2 starvation. While some C4 plants, like corn and sugarcane, can tolerate lower levels, most plants on Earth need a minimum of 150 ppm to survive"
Apparently not. Or heat.
Or decay either
juden
the real agenda behind your "skepticism," Gurbles
"Warmest day on record." Records kept for the last 150 years.*
Good.
Cool story bro. Still doesnt explain that CO2 is not magically self regulating.
Human didn't evolve yet lil bro...
k
Who are you quoting?
It's not. How stupid are you?
Everyone I dont like is a jew and I can easily ad hominem because attacking an argument is like work to use facts and logic and shit and I'm a democrat and who has the time or energy for all of that.
shut up
you literally scapegoated Jews, Shitler
You lost the plot
Nice ad hominem. Care to muster any facts and logic or are you simply a juvenile in both mind and body?
Still waiting on any sort of logical argument based on facts, cupcake.
Yeah. Nobody, ever, has said that carbon dioxide is magical or self regulating and you are a moron for thinking that either have to do with the carbon cycle. Questions?
you seem rather upset that adults run the science sector
That's weird, I wasn't ever presented with one of those.
Carbon has nothing to do with the carbon cycle. Got it.
Weird strawman, but ok.
Can you really keep calling it a "carbon cycle" if it keeps ending up in the ground as fossil fuels and humans have to keep extracting it to keep the plants from starving at 170ppm CO2?
Thats not really a cycle. Its a dead end. Much like your genetics, you wanker.
Weird strawman, but ok. Have you ever tried actual research instead of just making shit up?
Sure, buddy.
All that 170 ppm and subsequent rise happened before humans evolved btw
So no? Why don't you try it. Start with an intro climate science course and go from there.
This implies he has access to college
And overall the CO2 levels dropping from 9,000ppm to their all time lows of 350ppm or lower also happened before humans evolved.
A brief interruption in a long term trend changes nothing. CO2 tends to go into the groud more than it comes out.
Here. Free ebook. Just read it in your spare time. I assume you have a lot of that.
Nah, there's free textbooks and courses online.
LoL @ left leaning nonsense. Oregon State? What a joke. Home of antifa and communism.
I'm sure you know that science is more complicated than taking two data points and drawing a straight line.
According to who? Here's a different one.
open.umn.edu
Nice oversimplification there, broseph. But for millions of years the atmospheric CO2 levels have been dropping. And not in a straight line. How would you explain that? Where did all of the CO2 go? It went into the ground, didnt it?
If it didnt just escape along with solar wind like hydrogen did, and it wouldnt because its heavier than other atospheric gases, then it must have went into the ground, right?
LoL.
h
Where did all of the CO2 go in the millions of years that have passed?
I'm just working with what you gave me. A straight line with no cause or explanation. If you think that's what science is then you should stop arguing and go learn something.
Read the textbook to find out. I promise it's in there.
A straight line with no cause or explanation.
Not a straight line and all I've offered you are explanations despite all of the childish ad hominem personal attacks.
Where did all of the CO2 go?
That's not true at all. You've made weird strawmen and have never once provided any evidence for your nonsense arguments.
k
I accept your concession.
TIL google lied about past atmospheric CO2 levels being much higher than today.
Weird strawman, but ok. Do you have any evidence for any of your claims?
Sure, buddy.
man you really pissed off the bots
Then what is it?
The rabble must be roused. Also thanks for noticing me, Senpai.
Tribbles. In the grain storage bins.
Are you going to circle jerk or present evidence of your claims?
Yes.
I'm waiting.
The fossil fuel industry is worth over 10 trillion dollars. It's the most wealthy industry in the world. The entire reason you have this retarded opinion is because it was pushed by people who are paid to push it. Policy designed to stop climate change does create profit for some people, but policy designed to ignore climate change makes trillions more than could ever be dreamed of.
Good.
Now do the Chinese solar/battery industry.
I accept your concession.
The Chinese government over promotes so called climate change, AGW to weaken the US economy and yet little Greta Tunberg never complains or says "how very dare you" to the Chinese who did not sign on to the Paris Climate Accord. Why is that?
You try too hard.
That's not true and thanks to you fucks blocking action I'm dealing with more ticks every year as the winters get milder.
You don't try at all because you're a useful idiot.
k
Retards don't understand logarithmic scaling
I accept your concession.
Everyone I disagree with is obviously an shill. Improper engrish is deliberate just to trigger you, lol.
Libshits despise perspective for it ruins their narratives. Source: me, a white man whos ancesters were slaves in the Arab and Barbary slave trade.
Despite a natural sense of balance and a mindfulness of future supply the plant life of planet Earth just kept eating all of its CO2 and whittled it down from a once high point of well over 9,000ppm and it was only when it hit 170ppm CO2 or so that the plant life mindfully decided that it was time to go on a CO2 diet and become conservative in nature despite having no brains and no central nervous system because they are just fucking plants.
Alrighty then.
The only trend visible here is towards stabilization.
Oh, and the rocks and minerals just also had a good monch on CO2 but dont worry those are smart rocks that will balance the atmospheric CO2 levels magically because all rocks are really zen buddhist masters of equilibrium and shit. LoLz.
So you agree that modern observations show warming at an increased than that observed in the past?
*increased rate
More cool stories of le climate hockey stick despite only 1.6 degrees of warming in 200 years.
Your desperation is showing. You're beginning to doubt your leftist programming.
That 2 degrees in 200 years could also easily be attributed to us producing more actual heat. 200 years ago people didn't almost all have cars with very hot engines. There weren't so many factories with tons of electric motors for automation. Just straight up heat. No clear weightless gas that's ,measured in tons hocus pocus.
measured in tons hocus pocus.
And yet this planet Earth escaped manh ice ages before humans without any so called "hocus pocus."
Thats the thing about theories. Either they work all of the time or they dont work. If you can poke a lot of holes in a theory with many exceptions it means you need a better theory.
Are you having a stroke?
Sure, buddy.
Makes sense.
I've also had an ass load of seizures since I started using this site. Not sure why. I dont have any when using other websites.