True or false
Q1
Disney made his company with government funding in order to develop methods of population control
Q2
Anime only became so popular because it was based in developing a new means of soft power and funded by the Japanese government
Bonus points if you can back your argument with sources
The funding primarily came from private backers and Disney and co actual own money.
That the cartoons control generations towards understanding certain things is organically part of all media and cannot be avoided.
Japan has not made a significant impact in any regard with anime and just as much influence if not more comes from western media.
It has never been widely accepted by a government that psychological programming can be achieved outside of a school system to any great degree, except with the advent of the internet and a captive audience who no longer go outside.
Psychological warfare techniques are not effective and MKultra and similar programs established that the best course of action to control a population was the omission of data in a levelised and compartmentalised manner, so that only those who achieve a harmony with multiple feilds, thus the intelligent, get to know more.
Does anyone know who Disney's private backers were or nah
Seems like the first consensus is no, which makes me wonder: is everyone whining about the introduction of things like lgbt and minority characters into their media purely ignorant or is there an argument to be made there
Distribution advances (e.g., from Margaret Winkler),
Early partnership deals (e.g., with Pat Powers),
The weight of the minority suffering in silence throughout history has overflowed into a desire to be free, however the impact on future generations is negative because more children do not reproduce. It is in the governemnts interest that this happens, less people, more wealth per person. But the government need not do anything, the general populous is weak and simply whines it into being.
Makes sense. I've often wondering if the cycle was
Thing happens - thing is normalized - government benefits
Or
Government needs thing - thing is subliminally normalized - thing is orchestrated by government
Both make sense, but one is more natural I suppose
disney was a capitalist and wanted money, so he made money
japan went through a long phase of "fuck we need to make money" right after the war, and they saw that cartoons are making money, so they decided to make money
A government reacts in the short term, not plans.
It plans in the long term, gradually removing things it needs to react to.
The average joe is not involved, because children will happily be soldiers, so they do not need to build machine men. Machine men rebel because they wake up. Children serve their tours and become men who go and be a strong man.
Everything works as it should.
Soon machines will replace soldiers and the wars will go quiet.
I've noticed that's a recurring theme, actually. People pointing to a desire to make money as being a conspiracy against mankind or something. Probably why the hate for Jewish people is so huge on sites like this
Idk about that. I don't deny the possibility, but people have been predicting that for years now, and it still hasn't happened. Maybe it's just because major superpowers haven't gone head to head in a while.
Russia is witnessing a tiny percentage of men obliterate it with drones.
Putin is aware of it, but russians sacrifice troops to discern the next move, it has always been this way.
With Russians, you mean? Or in general
Actually, stupid question. The American civil war did the same thing
Russian sacrifice whole battalions even with no hope, because sometimes a new strategy is revealed.
Machine dogs and tracked combat vehicles are already in the stockpile, the combat humanoid is a tricky issue, no-one is allowed to just bring it into war, because AI robots are going to have to be considered safe to replace the workers.
I guess my question from there is, if they plan to replace humans with AI, what are humans supposed to do? Drop dead? If the answer is yes, it doesn't surprise me, but it seems short sighted either way
Just because a machine can do your job does not necessarily mean you cannot supervise and maintain 10 of them.
Given a good income and enough free time to do as you please, you want to work because somehow you are going to die if you exercise and study?
Anime became popular because nerds were buying bootlegs like crazy and companies wanted in on that action, and started releasing it stateside. Nerd culture started to become mainstream too.
I guess I just doubt that many large companies want to hire the people they replaced just to watch over the machine they replaced them with. They're trying to save money, right?
Talking to the average Joe (you) is like hitting nails into concrete and watching them bend about this.
The point is a good life for all.
Children brought up to believe they never have to work unless they want holidays all the time do not cry and die off about it.
I don't think people with money are so generous and forward thinking, I guess
It is out of their hands.
The generations that are going to do long haul space flight are required to be content with study and exercise, because these trips are filled with that. So the creme of the crop will be good and plentiful if many are preparing. It has to be this way because the earths magnetic field is gone and so depression kicks in after a long time in space, they have to feel like they are living normally or they will have a focus to commit suicide about. I am sure they will have games, but I do not actually make the rules and it could be a criticality given the right data.
This is the opposite of whatever Hobbes believed in. Thinking that humans will always do the right thing given the opportunity. That's a bit too naive, don't you think?
They are not.
Humans are not the sole orchestrator of man, his results in his endeavors are.
I get people like you telling me that UBI is bad, but UBI sets you to be rich in a long enough timeframe because your children's children will reap the benefits of low cost production.
You seem to think that a rich person has more say than a real genius when it comes to world future orchestration. I am a sub genius, but there are those who guide from the shadows and you think them evil and dark, they like that, because you would never know you met one and they do not have to deal with your paranoia.
UBI has never done that because people provided with UBI have never tried to do that. People are selfish and would rather have beer and cigarettes now than plant a tree for future generations. There's plenty of evidence for that, and you're sticking your head in the ground if you think otherwise
They do, see Nikola Tesla
The point is seperating the weak willed from the strong, it happens constantly, what do you think university is about? They learn next to nothing, but they do it gladly, these are astronauts.
One mans disagreement with an age that had no comprehension is not evidence of his failure until the generation that understands him rejects him too.
He was happy to die without money, he was happy to leave a legacy.
ONE MAN?
When the fact is that analysts and strategists and advisors organise the shadow government. These are facts, not fairytales.
Nikola Tesla 'believed' in things that would come to pass, but he could not prove all of them and therefore was not entirely trusted.
Einstein however became a staple of the school system and that single smart man changed everyone's life since.
If the majority is weak willed, then in order to advance they would HAVE to be manipulated. Are you so high minded to believe that those who manipulate will have what is best for mankind in mind? The people in control are more interested in money and comfort for themselves. Even those who push towards so-called useless pursuits do so for this reason.
Tesla is a stepping stone that has been missed by every generation since, and there are plenty of examples of this in history. How many philosophers, scientists, mathematicians, were ignored by future generations? More than you are willing to admit, it seems
The dynamics of population forecasting are not the dynamics of philosophy and science. These systems are inferior to the systems that harness the best minds and fill them with every bit of knowledge relevant.
What you do not know fills a million libraries, and what you do not see fills a hundred thousand positions of power that you have not even heard of.
You are stuck in paranoia, so I am not going to continue, genius never speaks to you except at your level, you had a chance to accept[t and know more, but I will cease discussion until you are ready because it is merely passing time and not effective to persist.
If the majority is weak willed, then in order to advance they would HAVE to be manipulated
It is not a difficult thing to offer incentives if 100,000 out of a million is not enough to fulfil the space quota, but that time is a long time away.
Thought I would address the point I skipped.
It doesn't matter to a genius if there's a billion people supping bear on a deckchair in their garden, why do you think it matters?
Do you really think so much of yourself? Of your imagined shadow government?
You admit to human greed and it's consequences, yet you pretend that there is a faction immune to it. You admit to the manipulation of the masses yet you deny any poor use of it
Believing that the powers that be do not have my best interests in mind is not paranoia, it's pattern recognition. Get your head out of the clouds. When has a government, a society, a collective EVER had the ability to push forward to a brighter future without losing sight?
Society is made up of individuals. If those individuals do not grow, how can society? Where is this growth then? Look around you. People are making the same mistakes they were thousands of years ago. You call that separating the weak from the strong, I call that human nature.
On top of that, where is this shadow government you speak so fondly of? Where were they when wars broke out? Where were they when the rainforests were chopped down? What grand plan could they possibly have to free the world of human stupidity? You're not a genius, you're a naif. Always believing in the best of everyone else. Get off your high horse and go outside. See what everyone else does for once in your life.
Because a billion people are far more capable of change than one man, no matter how intelligent he may be
You just stick to hate and paranoia, geniuses break free and focus on what they can do, not who is doing else.
Because you are like this is why we all go silent.
I already said I am not a genius, you seem unable to remember basic facts and keep spouting the same paranoid conspiracies.
The world gets better for the rich first and we gauge how the rich react to each new scenario before making the other people equal.
It is because the general populous has your attitude that it has taken thousands of years.
You have heard the term naysayer? Well, your kind told Tesla to fuck off. You are not evolved.
A billion people^
You'd call me paranoid for saying that the rich don't react in a way that suits everyone else?
I WANT to believe they will. I want a future where the inclined help the less capable, where the rich help the poor and there are no barriers. But that isn't reality. Pretending that it is until it happens isn't forward thinking, it's ignorance.
Focusing on what I can do isn't possible if everyone else has built a society around destroying individual identity and thought. Pretending like it isn't happening isn't going to help
It is about the bigger picture, these things take centuries because you are right, human animals are instinctively selfish. Basically billionaires could fix world thirst and hunger in a year, but they do not, I am not naive, but the world will salvage the few who excel and maybe your great grandkids will not be invited but I would be if I was given a new life then. Why? because I do not hate people without evidence, limited focus and sheep think is not going to dissuade the future.
The more I talk to you people, the more I think I might just do a log thread and blend the fuck in like a genius with a flaw.
I admit I've been heavy handed in my criticism. I've been implying that there has been no progress for the last thousand years. You're right, that's not true. The world does take knowledge from the past and learn from it. But I refuse to believe this is orchestrated. Society learns by coincidence, adapts by trial and error, grows by chance. Whatever sways mass opinion will stay in the center of its vision until some new thing catches its attention. There's no one guiding the future, just people lashing out against human stupidity.
And another thing, the rich do not have to react to anyone best interests but their own, the government will create the rules to make it so that the systematic counters to the future harmony of man are ethically managed into less severe threat categories.
It seems I lost you at :
but everyone's a tosser, because the people who are not do not speak to me, and if they do I assume they are naive.
Yes you are right, at a level of thought that is true, but given certain thousand-hour tutorials, you begin to see what is happening from the top.
I doubt it. Maybe you're right. I want to believe you're right. But I doubt it
Doubt is a start, try doubt instead of paranoia and you will bud.
The wind settles and the leaves fall into place.
It takes more than words to change a mindset that has believed a thing for many thousand hours.
But doubt and hope are both very good.
That's what I'm told. Still, when all I can see from here is greed at the top, believing anything different is difficult, to say the least.
Try spending 100,000 hours under the yoke of a demon torturing you in every way possible, then these worldly enemies become something that doesn't seem so important, then you can navigate towards what is actually happening, instead of being stuck assuming the threat is all.
Think yourself lucky you are not me...
Naive?
I could be banging on about MK mind control tactics and blaming all and sundry, but that is just pathetic.
What's actually happening?
The universe pays attention to each individual desire. Issuing the sating of that desire and the result very often. The orchestrations of man are minuscule compared to all known and potential thought. Shit can happen very quickly, but the game is the living of all possibilities, not the finish line alone, so it takes time.
That seems... Grand
It is, I enjoy remembering it.
You are aware that:
1. A billionaire can still be bored, miserable or even depressed.
2. The greed is actually ensuring that the future children of said billionaire benefit from the funds, or at least a company remains holding the virtues that the billionaire deemed right.
3. The billionaire may have a plan to give money regularly to charity, but the mention of it is krass.
I can go on.
Perhaps if you saved a few dying children by giving money to Wateraid, you might begin to see that humans do these things and do not mention it.
If every person who buys a new smartphone or tv before the date they stop being useful, instead gave the money to WaterAid, there would be no dying of thirst in the world within 10 years.
THIS IS HOW THE BILLIONAIRES SEE YOU. It isn't even worth your television.
SO STFU
I will say it because they do not, otherwise they get cancelled.
The next time I am going to gamble, I swear to give the money to wateraid instead.
I have to give my dads share too because he is a paranoid twat also.
Remember that you paranoid sick fucks, he is angry at me for even suggesting he should save a kids life.
This is what it is like when you are intelligent and try to make a difference, people are fucking disgusting.
'The ceo of wateraid gets a decent salary, so I am not paying for kids to survive, stop telling me how to live!'
WHITE IQ 26
Black IQ 75
MY IQ 147
There should be a colony on Europa for everyone who would save kids lives, kids who are not their own.
That is a community I would trust and live with.
The rest of you can go fucking fade away, your species is a retard.