Did the media treat Kamala Harris unfairly?

LOL.
The audacity of this question.
What about Trump being treated unfairly for the last 8+ years?
Oh, but let's all cry about the entitled DEI bitch from California.
Gotcha.

Trump is Hitler!

Threat to democracy!

Another post of the liberals eating each other over this epic ass kicking. Like European Communists Democrat's are looking for someone to shoot over this failure. See to believe in Communism or Socialism the system must remain perfect, it can never be the cause of failure. So like their Soviet brothers they are looking for a person or persons to stand up against a post and shoot them in the head. People make the mistakes, the failures. The system is Science, perfect and without blame. Over 100 million people died in Genocide's in the 19th Century over Communist purges in multiple countries. Democrats ignore History because they think they can do Communism better.

Trump-6.png - 720x894, 496.84K

Can't really blame them, though. They have a vested interest in Idiocracy Part Deux.

you are misinterpreting this, the data shows harris got more coverage and still lost. the claim that harris somehow got unfavorable media coverage compared to trump is hilarious

Not really. She had a billion dollar budget. Her campaign could have communicated what it needed to in a better way and led the coverage in a different direction. I voted for her and donated $20 to her. I can still tell you she ran a shit campaign. I also want her to stop sending me emails asking for more money. I keep getting the damn things after she lost.

unfairly

you floor cleaner-drinking retarded cunt, they were hailing her like the second coming of Christ when she was constantly drunk at her speeches, faking racist accents and panicking when anything went slightly off script.

She wasn't capable of delivering what she needed to win. That is like throwing a normie out on a NBA court and saying

You just gotta dunk it or sink some 3 pointers to win.

No amount of advice could have made her win. She didn't do long unscripted interviews because she can't. She needs to know the question and have a scripted answer.

And if dems were smart and allowed "muh democracy" to play out with the voting and delegates, maybe they could've gotten someone that was capable, but this is what happens when you are force-fed a shit candidate.

If she had a dick, the media would have been sucking it non-stop.
You're fucking ridiculous to try and gaslight people that she was unfairly treated. You propagandists are evil people.

Yup, treated her like a real candidate.

no, they covered what she talked about, it's not the media's fault she spent most of her time talking about identity politics

Say what you want about Trump, he is authentic. You know he believes the shit he says when he's saying it. The same cannot be said of Kamala. She panders and says whatever she thinks the audience wants to hear. Anyone with an ounce of life experience listens to her and thinks "she's completely full of shit"

Trumps achievement

such as?

more coverage, nearly all of it positive....And she still fucking lost...

Capture20.jpg - 701x394, 42.6K

Trump lovers always say this shit so I gave him an honest assessment back during the 2016 cycle. He was supportive of universal healthcare on the campaign trail which I thought was refreshing for a Republican candidate, it even got him cheers from his audiences. Then he got to the debate with Hillary and said it's bad because it's "what Hillary wants" and in that moment I knew he's not authentic at all. His supporters are fucking retards who won't question anything he says. They just want some authoritarian who acts like he knows it all to run everything. His first term was a disaster, humiliation after humiliation with constant turnover of cabinet positions, just rank fucking incompetence on full display, and it will happen again but you retards have a short memory. I'm glad I left the United States. Enjoy your tariffs dipshit.

We are glad you left too!

You're full of shit.

Your guy is already fucking up. He tried to install someone investigated for sex trafficking underage girls in as attorney general and that shit got borked. It's just going to be the same thing as last time. A revolving door of fucking grifters who can't do the jobs they are assigned to worth a shit.

As opposed to Biden's freak show of trannies and faggots? Remember the one who got arrested for stealing women's clothing at airports?

welcome to the duopoly. You just only wanna point fingers when it's not "your side" doing the grifting.

I'd rather have a million trannies and faggots than one underage sex trafficker.

I'm not that fond of the Democrats either really. I voted for them with the full knowledge that they likely won't do anything to make things better. They are careerist politicians who will serve their corporate masters. I made the decision with the assumption that the other guys are going to do a lot to make things worse, if not through their evil intentions through their limitless incompetence. There's a reason Mike Pence isn't back on board this time. There's a reason we have a brand new slate of grifters getting appointed to top positions, mostly people who lost their elections but were loyal to Trump lmao.

Did the media treat Kamala Harris unfairly?

Yes.
They gave her WAY more credit and presumption of competence than she ever deserved or earned.

You know he believes the shit he says when he's saying it

lmao, no he doesn't
he spent 4 years saying he actually won the 2020 election and it was all fraud, when privately he doesn't believe that, it's all for show to work up his supporters

She was just a shitty candidate.

Pure cope

I'd rather have a million trannies and faggots than one underage sex trafficker.

So you want zero trannies and faggots then. Lmao

I see. You're the type of person to blame the trannies and faggots for an issue that is far more representative of straight people. It's purely political for you. You don't actually care about pedophiles you care about scoring cheap points against the other side.

Your "side" are grooming authoritarians.
Only one side wants pedos for their alphabet club.

she never went out and rallied or did anything of value, kept appealing and pandering to propaganda sources and still was as charismatic as a wet paper bag.

She did 1/10th of the effort an 80 year old fat guy was doing.

jUdmiFKk0ylT.jpg - 1170x1160, 149.17K

Faggot drag shows for 8 year olds in school and books about giving blowjobs are both okay

You don't care about pedophiles. You care about scoring cheap points.

Choose one. Sure, there are way more straight pedophiles than tranny or fag ones. But at least the right doesn't actively fucking promote it like the left does.

Both of them were pretty shitty, though. And for good reason.

What about Trump being treated unfairly for the last 8+ years?

proof?

reee the joose reeeee

Holy shit you nutjobs are annoying.

Look up the percentage of negative coverage on trump during his presidency last time around.
Tell us all about it.

The niggers claiming Trump is an authoritarian who will use the justice department to go after political rivals and erode our democratic institutions literally rigged two of their past three national primaries to install the establishment preferred candidate and used the DOJ to "prosecute" their chief political rival in a fucking election year when they had two whole years to handle that if they were truly serious about "justice".

Either they care more about optics than justice, even if they were all legitimate charges. Or they *knew* they were all bullshit and didn't want them to all die too soon before the election. Either way, it's cause to give zero fucks about any of the allegations.

Also they literally think he's a cheeto nazi.