DemonKKKrats are the real racists
DemonKKKrats are the real racists
Nazis were democrat
blacks still vote with their old masters
fascinating
Yeah, that must be why they're the party of BLM and DEI and the NAACP.
Sorry chud, but this one ain't gonna work.
the past is the present and the future is the past, whatever I must say to fuck some dude's ass
Based Democrats
this bot's making the left look based.
Stuff changes. It's really not complicated.
that must be why they're the party of BLM and DEI and the NAACP.
which are all race based, glad you agree
No wonder the Confederate flag is so despised
except by MAGAs
Yeah, let's just stretch the term to include any discussion of race whatsoever
DemonKKKrats
12 yo detected
if you enact policies based on race, to give people preferential treatment based on their race, they're literally racist, by definition
no one changed what any terms mean
t. whiteboi who doesn't understand racism
if you enact policies based on race, to give people preferential treatment based on their race, they're literally racist, by definition
I don't necessarily disagree, but you're shifting the goalposts.
The OP is talking about "DemoKKKrats" being racist towards blacks, and now you're saying, what, they're racist towards whites? Sure, some are, but it's definitely not an accurate generalization.
Stop being a moron pls
DemonKKKraps support identity politics
I know, and that's the point. Thanks for further reinforcing what OP said.
The south is filled with cousin fucking retards and losers
Stuff changes.
So far the Left's embracing of identity politics hasn't changed.
The real contact is what Republicans jerk off to
I've already addressed this here . Try to keep up.
just when I thought US political debates couldn't get even more moronic
being racist towards blacks, and now you're saying, what, they're racist towards whites?
it can be both, it doesn't matter, racism is racism
asians are racist against other asians, light skinned black people are racist against dark skinned blacks
racism is racism, it doesn't matter who is doing it to who, it's still racist regardless
You are a racist.
The OP is talking about "DemoKKKrats" being racist towards blacks, and now you're saying, what, they're racist towards whites?
Even if what they're racist towards may change, the fact that Democrats are racist still remains. Republicans don't embrace identity politics.
it's only racism if it's against certain races
stfu, racist
Again, I don't disagree, but you're conveniently ignoring my point.
DemoKKKrats are the REAL racists
oh, I didn't mean towards blacks, necessarily, just, y'know, in a general sense
You're a moron, and you should stop participating in debates because you suck at it.
nope. i hate whites, which isn't racist.
but they are the real racists in a general sense, they even campaign on racism, it's a large part of what they talk about, all the time
Kamala even told voters you have to vote for me if you're a minority
stay mad whitey.
stay mad
I'm not mad, I'm not the one whose racist policies are being abandoned by governments and corporations
had to use nearly all black and white photos.
Post your nose OP
yeah, because they turned to racism for profits.
they even campaign on racism
The side that routinely uses racial slurs on social media, flies Confederate flags, protests the removal of Confederate statues, and obsesses over immigration as if it's the main problem we face as a country are far more racist towards POC. To suggest otherwise is utterly moronic, especially given what I outlined here .
As far as racism towards whites, the left is worse.
only because a portion of the public discourse was moving in that direction, now it's moving back in the other direction so they don't want to support it anymore
corporations don't actually care about any of this, they'll adopt any policies in any country if it makes them more money, you don't see them using pride flags in their social media and marketing in middle eastern countries, they only do it where the people are cool with it
thank you for agreeing with me racist whiteboi >:3
The side that routinely uses racial slurs on social media,
there are racist voters, sure, but only the Democrats campaign on racism, constantly
and obsesses over immigration
illegal immigrants isn't about race in the first place, why do you people try and turn every issue into a race issue?
I'm not the racist one here, and I don't support racist policies
Hating any race makes you racist.
but only the Democrats campaign on racism, constantly
Because you say so?
As far as I'm concerned, making illegal immigration the primary focus of your political campaign is kinda racist. Trump knew exactly what he was doing, and I think most Republicans knew too.
Not saying it's racist to wanna fix the immigration system. The Democrats have been too weak on the issue, if I'm being totally honest. But to make it a focal point of your campaign to the point where you have people chanting "build that wall" at all of your rallies, this enters into racist territory - especially since immigration shouldn't even make the top 3 on your list of concerns.
why do you people try and turn every issue into a race issue?
You know damn well why, you disingenuous cunt.
lmao those w*ites are stupid
Because you say so?
no, observable reality says so
making illegal immigration the primary focus of your political campaign is kinda racist.
illegal immigration isn't a race issue in the first place, if you aren't here legally you shouldn't be here, it doesn't matter what country you came from
Meanwhile, YOU:
i'm asian you racist.
no, observable reality says so
Ok, but I just told you why this is a dumb belief.
illegal immigration isn't a race issue in the first place
You're asking everyone who's reading your bullshit to stick their heads in the sand and pretend we don't see post after post after post talking about why we need to get rid of brown people and prevent them from entering the country.
Your propaganda game needs work, son
how so?
Because you say so?
Democrats themselves say so. Everything is about Race to them. Picrel.
but I just told you why this is a dumb belief
no, you said you think deporting illegals is racist, it isn't
and what does that have to do with Democrats campaigning on racism?
why we need to get rid of brown people
not everyone who's here illegally is brown, and not every brown person is here illegally. brown people even voted for Trump and fully support deporting illegals
stop making everything about race, racist
Your propaganda game needs work, son
the absolute irony
THEY STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND RACISM.
but look at what this septum-ringed feminist said on Twitter
Try harder
I have to admit, I lol'd at how ridiculous that twitter post is.
are all those typos on purpose?
no, you said you think deporting illegals is racist, it isn't
You lack reading comp.
not everyone who's here illegally is brown, and not every brown person is here illegally
The vast majority are. And remember, I didn't say illegal immigration was a racial issue, full stop.
Ffs dude, at least TRY to be honest.
pretty sure they do, if you create policies that give preferential treatment to people based on their race, that is by definition racism
what alternate definition are you using where that isn't considered racist?
wasting my time with y'all racist mayos.
The vast majority are.
because we share a border with Mexico, and people enter illegally from Mexico and other south american countries, and the barrier to entry is much lower than people coming from overseas, it isn't rocket science
that doesn't make it a race issue
I didn't say illegal immigration was a racial issue
you did actually, by trying to paint it as one by saying conservatives campaigned on deporting illegals, implying they're doing it for race reasons
at least TRY to be honest.
look in a mirror
because we share a border with Mexico
Never suggested otherwise, but thanks for edifying me.
you did actually, by trying to paint it as one by saying conservatives campaigned on deporting illegals, implying they're doing it for race reasons
No, actually, I didn't actually, you fuckin retard.
I said making it the focal point of your political campaign enters into racist territory, given the reasons I outlined. And again, you're asking everyone to ignore the fact that right-wingers are constantly talking about brown people being a scourge on the nation.
no argument
concession accepted
I said making it the focal point of your political campaign enters into racist territory
you just contradicted yourself, campaigning on problems in the country doesn't make those problems racist, the fuck are you on about?
you either think immigration is about race or it isn't, you can't have it both ways
you're asking everyone to ignore the fact that right-wingers
no I'm not, I'm asking you to look at what the parties actually campaign on, what their policies are, and Democrats campaign on and pass racist policies
compaigning on problems in the country doesn't make those problems racist
Ok, I'm starting to think you're literally slow.
I honestly don't know how else to elucidate my position. Maybe just read my posts again and try using all 4 of your brain cells.
no I'm not, I'm asking you to look at what the parties actually campaign on
1. You are. If you're telling people there isn't a racial element to to right-winger's obsession with cracking down on immigration, that's what you're asking.
Democrats campaign on and pass racist policies
I already acknowledged the fact that DEI, etc., is racist to some extent.
Lol I was gonna make a "2" but decided not to
I'm starting to think you're literally slow.
how am I slow when you're basically agreeing with me?
If you're telling people there isn't a racial element to to right-winger's obsession with cracking down on immigration,
racist people agreeing with a policy for their own reasons doesn't make the policy racist
people who aren't brown are also here illegally and get deported as well
brown people who are US citizens also support deporting brown people who are here illegally
so again, why do you have to constantly make everything about race?
how am I slow when you're basically agreeing with me?
You *think* I'm agreeing with you because you can't understand the nuance of my argument.
racist people agreeing with a policy for their own reasons doesn't make the policy racist
Lol omfg dude... I'm not saying the POLICY is racist. I'm saying the intense focus on immigration is partly predicated on a deep-seated racism towards POC within the Republican party.
because you can't understand the nuance of my argument.
the nuance is you think deporting illegals is about race because racists support it
that's not nuanced, or even valid
I'm not saying the POLICY is racist
so you do agree with me
I'm saying the intense focus on immigration is partly predicated on a deep-seated racism towards POC within the Republican party
how does that matter either way? there are a large number of left-wingers, many who are white, who have a deep-seated racism towards other white people
the difference is Democrats campaign on racist policies, Republicans don't
how many times do we have to have this same exchange until you get it?
the nuance is you think deporting illegals is about race because racists support it
NO.
so you do agree with me
Depends on what the hell you're talking about.
the difference is Democrats campaign on racist policies, Republicans don't
If you're talking about specific policies, I might agree.
But this whole argument started because of your claim that the Dems campaign "on racism" not "racist policies." There's a difference. Do you get it now, or do I need to continue speaking to you as if you're a mentally handicapped 5yo?
If you're talking about specific policies,
as opposed to what? what else do you campaign on?
But this whole argument started because of your claim that the Dems campaign "on racism" not "racist policies."
they do both, they campaign on racism AND racist policies, how are you this confused?
as opposed to what? what else do you campaign on?
Racism or a lack thereof, according to you.
You see, racism is not a policy. It's a broad concept that may or may not include public policy.
they do both, they campaign on racism AND racist policies, how are you this confused?
How many times do I have to partially agree before you stop repeating this? The Dems definitely do their best to win the POC vote by promoting policies that give them preferential treatment.
That said, there are much bigger things to worry about, and the Republican party is far too big of a threat to this country for some DEI policies to make me vote for them - but I'm definitely not gonna get into this with you because, frankly, you're kinda stupid.
In the minds of Rightoids, Democrats aren't the vocal proponents of equality but are actually all the most spiteful, evil, racist motherfuckers they know. Of course this is just them projecting / double-thinking / call it what you want.
If that's true then why does the KKK support Trump?
yeah lets not forget all the other domestic terrorist organizations supporting Donald / Melon.
Racism or a lack thereof, according to you.
no, idiot, you campaign on policy, there's nothing else to campaign on
"campaigning on racism" implies you're pushing for racist policy, that's the point of electing people, to enact policy you want to see put in place, that's the entire point of elections and voting for candidates
You see, racism is not a policy
you might legitimately be retarded, which is ironic given you're trying to call other people dumb
How many times do I have to partially agree before you stop repeating this?
I don't give a shit whether you agree or not, Democrats are racist and push racist policies, this isn't contingent on you agreeing or not, it's a matter of fact, it's observable, and independent of any opinions you might have
The Dems definitely do their best to win the POC vote by promoting policies that give them preferential treatment
you agree they promote and support racist policies, why do you keep arguing with me when you clearly agree with the points I make? I don't understand what you're trying to accomplish
Democrats aren't the vocal proponents of equality
because they aren't, they cloak their racism in the name of equality, but giving advantages to some and putting others at a disadvantage based on race isn't equality, it's racist
equality would be no races are treated differently, everyone is given a chance based strictly on merit, not race
if a racist person agrees with me, that doesn't mean I'm a racist, that's not how that works
a large number of hispanic and black people also voted for Trump
If that's true then why does the KKK support Trump?
They don't.
I mean blackrock and vanguard are invested look at the data on fintel. I have 1280 shares I'm not lying. I'm bullish on PLTR and SOUN regardless of election results besides the unrealized capital gains shit. If minimum wage is 15 then most fast food will cut hours with voice AI its common sense this is where the direction of technology is going, and Blackrock seems to agree with me, I say don't have all of your portfolio in it but you should get a $6 c with intent to execute if it's in the money, I have a spidey senses gut feeling about this like how I did when palantir was sub 30. I have 1280 I'm selling 30-60% and holding 500 to 1000 shares if it goes to 10-15, I'm holding more but holding atleast 100 shares of palantir and a few hundred shares of soundhound to 2030. My exit profits I'm putting in something real long term and dividend paying like $BP or $VICI. 19 yo I seem like I have alot of correct hunches about finance I'm a old soul I told my parents about btc at 4k.
Roll the dice on a call and intend to execute if earnings are well, there's going to be alot of people I'm telling toldya when they are seething about not making it this cycle. Systemic/institutional SaaS is the future this isn't 2013 anymore most of the winners are already decided, palantir and soundhound are winners do your research they are contracted with the millitary, big chip companies/surveillance and they are invested in by big names like blackrock nvidia and vanguard. I got burnt trying to be bearish in 2023 so I'm doing what's most likely to win out = jewish companies will profit. They intend for every car to have soundhound AI so if you say wrong think it will be forwarded to the feds, with palantirs AI watching where your car is going. They want a surveillance state, soundhounds AI is working, research McDonald's firing IBM because their voice AI is trash while white house and Detroit chicken shack is still using soundhound. The fundamentals are there for success
"campaigning on racism" implies you're pushing for racist policy
"Campaigning on racism" can also mean making illegal immigration the focal point of your campaign in attempts to capitalize on racism within a segment of the country.
You don't get to objectively define an expression just because my interpretation doesn't align with what you were trying to express.
you agree they promote and support racist policies, why do you keep arguing with me when you clearly agree with the points I make?
I've been arguing that the Dems aren't the only ones who "campaign on racism." If you didn't have a room-temp IQ, you would have realized this a long time ago.
"dats racist" is the same exact argument you Rightoids complain about Leftoids of doing. What you're actually mad about is that you aren't getting benevolent discrimination in spite of the fact that you're not the sort of victim of a long and well-defined history of targeted discrimination that would call for benevolent discrimination. It's crab mentality.
Is it a deliberate attempt at blatant gaslighting, or are you just a truly special kind of stupid?
Do you actually believe the bullshit you say?
why do you keep trying to deflect talking about how the Democrats are racist by saying deporting illegals is somehow bad, when most people support it?
I've been arguing that the Dems aren't the only ones who "campaign on racism."
but they are, and you've continued to be unsuccessful in arguing that position
illegal immigration in the US isn't a racism issue no matter how much you want it to be
you might be able to argue that if the US was homogeneous, like a small asian or european country where everyone is the same race, and all the illegals are a different race. the US is nothing like that, we have everyone here, and illegals aren't of any particular race, we have illegals from all around the world
If you didn't have a room-temp IQ,
again, the absolute irony
concession accepted
Verlierer
"Campaigning on racism" can also mean making illegal immigration the focal point of your campaign
how is campaigning on an admittedly non-racist policy somehow contorted into "campaigning on racism" in your mind? make it make sense
the liberal thought process boggles the mind
you aren't getting benevolent discrimination
why wouldn't I want the same advantages that other races get? why sane person wouldn't want the system to work for them, and not against them?
victim of a long and well-defined history of targeted discrimination
I didn't live 100 or 200 years ago, what happened in the past is not my problem, and I'm not responsible for it, I wasn't there, I didn't do any of that, and neither did you
I'm not going to pretend to be guilty or make up for stupid shit that someone else did before I was even born
and I'm not a racist because of it either
why do you keep trying to deflect talking about how the Democrats are racist by saying deporting illegals is somehow bad, when most people support it?
1. Most people aren't in favor of mass roundups of immigrants whose only crime is not having proper documentation.
2. Supporting a crackdown on illegal immigration is one thing - making it the focal point of your political campaign is another. And if you still can't understand where I'm coming from here, you need to just agree to disagree and drop it, because there is nothing I can possibly say to make it sink into your thick skull.
illegal immigration in the US isn't a racism issue no matter how much you want it to be
Lol I'm surprised you even know how to use a computer. Your failure to understand my position after, what, 3 hours, is actually astonishing.
You wish. Keep lying.
why wouldn't I want the same advantages that other races get? why sane person wouldn't want the system to work for them, and not against them?
Yeah exactly. That's why you voted for Donald "hand outs" Trump. You claim to hate socialism and yet all you guys whine about is that you're not getting enough entitlements lol.
And of course you didn't live that long ago. And you know what, that's totally cool. Stop being bitch made about it then. Jesus fucking christ.
What's funny is most racist republicans can't handle big words, either.
Most people aren't in favor of mass roundups of immigrants
of course they aren't, but most people are in favor of deporting ILLEGAL aliens, not legal immigrants, stop trying to play games with language to paint it as something different
if you aren't here legally, you need to go, simple as
whose only crime is not having proper documentation.
so, they're illegals then?
making it the focal point of your political campaign is another.
how so? you aren't allowed to campaign on legitimate issues that voters care about? if it's not legitimate, and most people don't support it, how did Trump win the election campaigning on it? if it wasn't a popular policy then he wouldn't have won
And if you still can't understand where I'm coming from here
I know exactly where you're coming from, you're trying to paint everyone who wants to deport illegals as a racist, which isn't true
how is campaigning on an admittedly non-racist policy somehow contorted into "campaigning on racism" in your mind?
If you make it a focal point of your campaign (despite the fact that there are much more pressing issues plaguing our economy and Democracy), it could (and probably does) mean you're taking advantage of the fact that there is a sizable contingent of racists within the Republican party who would be more inclined to support you if you got them excited about the opportunity to get rid of as many brown people as possible.
This is very uncomplicated shit, dude.
You claim to hate socialism
not supporting racist policies that give people advantages for their race has nothing to do with socialism, what are you even talking about?
Stop being bitch made about it then
you're the one who brought it up, not me, you're the one that's clearly mad about the past and think we need to over-correct for the past, and punish people alive today for something they had nothing to do with
gaslighting
Look at all these things your party has tried to gaslight/memoryhole.
calls something a lie
doesn't explain what is a lie or how
offers no evidence
Typical
opportunity to get rid of as many brown people as possible.
it doesn't matter what your race is, if you're not here legally, you need to go, this has nothing to do with racism
and how many times do I have to point out, and for you to ignore, than hispanics and blacks also voted for this
your entire argument is it's a racist policy because some people who are racist support it, which is a meaningless argument
there's also people who aren't racist who support it, it has nothing to do with anything, why do you people have to make every fucking issue about race? all you're doing is proving over and over how racist you are, you can't stop thinking about race
What's funny is most racist republicans can't handle big words, either.
You sure about that? Right-Wingers have a higher verbal IQ than Leftists.
stop trying to play games with language to paint it as something different
???
These are things Trump promised to do, you fucking nitwit. He promised mass roundups of anyone who's here illegally.
how so? you aren't allowed to campaign on legitimate issues that voters care about?
Yes, you are. Missing my point again.
if it's not legitimate, and most people don't support it, how did Trump win the election campaigning on it?
For a number of reasons. Perhaps one of those reasons is because there are a lot of racists who wanna get rid of POC and prevent them from entering the country. And before you go full retard again, I'm not saying wanting to deport illegal immigrants is racist, in and of itself.
I know exactly where you're coming from, you're trying to paint everyone who wants to deport illegals as a racist, which isn't true
With each post, you just make yourself seem dumber and dumber.
Here's a thought experiment for you anon. Why do you think they called Trump bucks "social" welfare?
no, I'M the real racist
It doesn't matter what your race is, if you're not here legally, you need to go, this has nothing to do with racism
And here you are, continuing to miss my point. Unfuckingbelievable.
and how many times do I have to point out, and for you to ignore, than hispanics and blacks also voted for this
Lol you think blacks and Hispanics wanna live around each other?
your entire argument is it's a racist policy because some people who are racist support it, which is a meaningless argument
And here you are, missing my point AGAIN.
there's also people who aren't racist who support it, it has nothing to do with anything, why do you people have to make every fucking issue about race?
And here you are, missing my point A G A I N
it doesn't matter what your race is, if you're not here legally, you need to go, this has nothing to do with racism
Elon isn't here legally.
He promised mass roundups of anyone who's here illegally.
correct, key word "illegally"
not every immigrant is here illegally, people aren't being rounded up and deported for being immigrants, they're being deported for being illegals
that's what I was calling out, this game of trying to pretend like "immigrant" and "illegal alien" can be used interchangeably, when they are very different things
Perhaps
so you don't know, are just making shit up, and speculating why people agree with something, and are now mad because people support legitimate concerns
I'm not saying wanting to deport illegal immigrants is racist, in and of itself.
then why does it make you so triggered?
you just make yourself seem dumber and dumber.
once again, the absolute irony
Why do you think they called Trump bucks "social" welfare?
I have no idea what you're referring to, I've literally never heard of that
Elon isn't here legally.
Elon has been a US citizen for over 20 years
That would be true assuming he came to the US legally.
do you even know what point you're trying to make?
a US citizen is a US citizen, what distinction do you think you're making?
Are you stupid? You do realize he's not a natural-born US citizen right? He had to come to the US on a visa that can be legally voided, right?
The standardization of brightness in HDR is the stupidest thing ever. There's no good argument for content having "correct brightness", no display can get even close to realistic outdoor brightness, and perceived brightness depends on viewing conditions anyway. What current HDR does is it arbitrarily brickwall-limits highlight detail based on the capability of the display, which is so stupid that display manufacturers refuse to follow it and taper off the cut in their own custom curves, which makes real-world HDR applications extremely non-standard.
What a better HDR standard would do is standardize RELATIVE brightness values like sRGB gamma curves do but with sliding scale of possible curves to better fit high-end and low-end displays, with some agreed algorithm. The user could adjust the range of shadow and highlight detail according to their display capability and viewing conditions to a setting where the average brightness looks appropriate. The rest of the display's capability can then be allocated for the HDR detail based on these agreed upon curves.
Actually, the above suggestion is kind of like how brightness sliders work in games. To get the most out of your monitor, just max out the brightness (unlocking the maximum dynamic range for bright highlights) and adjust game brightness down to appropriate level (the highlights will still likely max out the brightness). This completely ignores saturation and color spaces though, again all monitors having different capabilities. Also, HDR monitors usually allow conditionally blasting higher brightness when in HDR mode than what it gives you for static brightness setting.
Also, HDR on LCD is a joke because of limited contrast, it's basically just a way to trade shadows (which were already bad) for more range in highlights.
not every immigrant is here illegally, people aren't being rounded up and deported for being immigrants, they're being deported for being illegals
Yes, and most people don't support mass roundups of illegal immigrants who never committed any crime other than being here illegally... which is what I just said about 10 minutes ago.
so you don't know, are just making shit up, and speculating why people agree with something
I know what I've read all over conservative social media. It's not pure speculation. And since we're currently on a forum in which extremely racist views regarding POC and immigration are discussed on a regular basis, you wouldn't be so quick to dismiss my speculation if you weren't unbelievably stupid and dishonest.
then why does it make you so triggered?
I already made my views on immigration clear. And I think I made it clear that *some* deportations and increased border security does not rigger me.
I'm about done with your idiocy, so make the next post a good one.
You do realize he's not a natural-born US citizen right?
but he is a citizen now, what legal mechanism do you think his citizenship could easily be revoked?
that can be legally voided
he's not on a visa anymore, he's a citizen, what are you trying to argue here?
legal mechanism
Irrelevant. ICE deports US citizens all the time. Why should Elon be special?
Yes, and most people don't support mass roundups of illegal immigrants
they do, actually, what data are you looking at that says the majority of people don't support deporting illegals?
I know what I've read all over conservative social media.
so you "feel" like some people only want to deport illegals because they're racist, and no other reasons? who cares? what difference does that even make? and I guarantee you're probably right, that there are very likely racists who think that way, but what does it matter? racists agreeing with a non-racist policy doesn't make the policy racist, why do you keep trying to bring this point up as if it changes anything?
I already made my views on immigration clear.
that illegals should be allowed to stay here, because reasons?
ICE deports US citizens all the time
surely you have proof to back up this wild claim, surely
I don't need to counter something that doesn't exist and you made no effort to support.
Yeah, that's bullshit. I've seen all of the graphics you've used in this thread before. You are a professional shill.
they do, actually, what data are you looking at that says the majority of people don't support deporting illegals?
Most people aren't opposed to simply deporting illegal immigrants. It's the mass-roundup approach that Trump was promoting that most people aren't necessarily in favor of.
"Removing immigrants who are in the country illegally and have not committed a violent crime is highly divisive, with only about 4 in 10 U.S. adults in support and slightly more than 4 in 10 opposed."
so you "feel" like some people only want to deport illegals because they're racist, and no other reasons?
It's called evidence, moron. There's plenty of it to support my case.
why do you keep trying to bring this point up as if it changes anything?
Because you've struggled to understand it for the past 4 fucking hours.
that illegals should be allowed to stay here, because reasons?
Point out where I even implied such a thing.
No, I believe people who have criminal records need to go. I also think people who've only been here for a year or two need to go. As for people who've been here for many years and are working and perhaps even contributing taxes, I think they should be left alone or granted a quick path to citizenship.
He overstayed his visa. He should've been deported.
Yes, and most people don't support mass roundups of illegal immigrants who never committed any crime other than being here illegally
Only the illegal immigrants we want
republicans. Can't make this shit up.
Most people aren't opposed to simply deporting illegal immigrants. It's the mass-roundup approach that Trump was promoting that most people aren't necessarily in favor of
what difference is there? it's ok to deport them, just not too many? for what reason?
Point out where I even implied such a thing.
by saying it's not ok to deport them all, and you're a racist if you want to deport them, you're implying only the worst criminal illegals should be deported, meaning the rest can stay
No, I believe people who have criminal records need to go
see? you literally just did it again, if you only want to deport the worst offenders that means you want the rest to stay, do you even know your own position?
but he wasn't deported, and got his citizenship
so unless you have a time machine to go back more than 20 years there's nothing you can do about it, seethe
republicans
the person you're replied to isn't a republican
what difference is there?
Ok, I'm being dead serious here: are you developmentally challenged? It's ok if you are, I'm just curious.
The difference is in how broad the approach to addressing the issue is. Some people want *all* illegal immigrants deported - others want a more targeted approach, in which productive people without criminal records get to stay.
by saying it's not ok to deport them all
"some illegals should be allowed to stay" =/= "illegals should be allowed to stay"
you literally just did it again, if you only want to deport the worst offenders that means you want the rest to stay, do you even know your own position?
I'm ok with people who've established themselves as relatively productive members over the course of many years staying because I'm not a psychopath.
Look, just because *you're* too dense to understand my position doesn't mean I am too.
But how can he be a legal citizen if he's always been an illegal immigrant?
I don't need to counter something that doesn't exist and you made no effort to support.
The Left's embracing of Id-pol is demonstrated by such things as BLM, DEI, CRT, etc.
Yeah, that's bullshit.
Proof?
The difference is in how broad the approach to addressing the issue is
you either support deporting illegals or you don't, the scale is irrelevant
would you only want some child molesters or murderers in prison and the others left free?
"some illegals should be allowed to stay" =/= "illegals should be allowed to stay"
it's cute how you think those are different
I'm ok with people who've established themselves
I'm not, if you're here illegally, gtfo out, idgaf how long you've evaded law enforcement
just because *you're* too dense to understand my position
you don't know your own position, you don't want to deport illegals while pretending you're ok with deporting them, just the really bad ones, the rest can stay
70 potential U.S. citizens were deported between 2015 and 2020
wow, potential, out of how many millions of illegals?
and if they're citizens it should be easy to prove that and not get deported, or just return
that's not very many, nowhere near the claim of "all the time", that's <15 a year, assuming it's even true
the scale is irrelevant
To you, maybe. Because you're dumb.
would you only want some child molesters or murderers in prison and the others left free?
There are certainly crimes I don't think should be crimes.
As for illegal immigrants without criminal records who've been here for a number of years, I think they should be granted a quick path to citizenship, thus making their status legal.
it's cute how you think those are different
It's sad that you think they're not.
I'm not, if you're here illegally, gtfo out, idgaf how long you've evaded law enforcement
Yes, you've made it quite clear that you're soulless and probably autistic.
you're ok with deporting them, just the really bad ones, the rest can stay
YOU'RE BEGINNING TO UNDERSTAND!!!!
However, "really bad" is really relative.
To you, maybe. Because you're dumb.
I'm not the dumb one, you either think it's ok the break the law or you don't, which is it?
it's sad that you think they're not.
you either support deporting illegals or you don't
you're soulless
stop trying to make emotional arguments about deporting illegals, it doesn't work
YOU'RE BEGINNING TO UNDERSTAND!!!!
like I said, you admit to saying illegals can stay here and then deny it when it's pointed out
There are certainly crimes I don't think should be crimes
oh, I get it now, you're a fucking pedo and think it should be legal to fuck kids, it all makes sense now, we're done here
shut up you stupid faggot, no one cares, go back to sucking Israeli dick you american pigdog
I'm not the dumb one, you either think it's ok the break the law or you don't, which is it?
You definitely are the dumb one because you fail to understand the following:
I don't think it's flat-out "ok to break the law." I'm saying I think it's reasonable and morally justified for us to allow *some* illegal immigrants a quick path to citizenship, which would make them legal citizens - i.e. they would no longer be in violation of the law.
you either support deporting illegals or you don't
Not that black and white, moron.
stop trying to make emotional arguments about deporting illegals, it doesn't work
It doesn't work because you're autistic and perhaps literally sociopathic.
like I said, you admit to saying illegals can stay here and then deny it when it's pointed out
*some* illegals, retard. Some.
oh, I get it now, you're a fucking pedo and think it should be legal to fuck kids, it all makes sense now, we're done here
Lol congratulations, in my 15+ years of using this website, you're literally the dumbest person I've ever interacted with on Anon Babble. Do you realize how fucking stupid you have to be for someone to say that? Do you realize how many knuckle-dragging retards populate this website?
I think it's reasonable and morally justified
but it isn't, at all
allow *some* illegal immigrants a quick path to citizenship,
they can leave and apply the legal way, like they should have in the first place
we have no moral obligation to allow illegals to stay because they weren't caught, fuck that
Not that black and white, moron.
but it really is
It doesn't work because you're autistic
it doesn't work because you can't make emotionally manipulate me to allow criminals to stay here illegally
you're literally the dumbest person
you directly quoted and replied to someone asking if you'd be ok with child molesters being free, and you said "some crimes shouldn't be crimes"
there is no other way to interpret that than you being a pedo and supporting the molesting of children
but it isn't, at all
Fantastic argument
they can leave and apply the legal way
If they've already established a life here and don't have any criminal record, making them leave and attempt to come back would be cruel.
but it really is
It's really not.
it doesn't work because you can't make emotionally manipulate me to allow criminals to stay here illegally
They would no longer be criminals if they're granted citizenship.
I thought you were done with me. Gotta get that last word, huh?
If they've already established a life here
illegally, they need to go, they can try again legally
would be cruel.
too bad, and they broke the law, you don't get to avoid the consequences of your actions because it's mean to hold you accountable
They would no longer be criminals if they're granted citizenship
correct, so maybe they should have gone through the proper legal route to citizenship instead of entering illegally
I quote...
would you only want some child molesters or murderers in prison and the others left free?
When you specify murderers and child molesters, you were speaking broadly about the worst crimes. It should go without saying that I'm not in favor of child molesters and murderers being freed. Interpreting "I think some crimes should not be crimes" in response to your question as "I am a pedo and think it should be legal to fuck children" is extraordinarily stupid.
My point was that the law is malleable. It's not God-given but rather invented by human beings. And I think crimes like, say, possession of certain drugs, should not be crimes. Another crime I think should not result in immediate punishment is being in the country without proper documentation.
Obviously we've reached an impasse here, although I'm glad you finally, after about 5 hours, understand where I'm coming from.
I'm sorry you lack a moral compass. God help you.
Yeah I bet you support locking up pedophiles too you fucking libcuck.
It should go without saying that I'm not in favor of child molesters and murderers
apparently not, because liberals are ok with people committing crimes and not being arrested, they even direct police to not arrest criminals
My point was that the law is malleable
in that it can be changed, through legislation, you don't get to just ignore the law because you think it's mean, that's not how that works
You really triggered the MAGAbot lol
Lol
apparently not, because liberals are ok with people committing crimes and not being arrested, they even direct police to not arrest criminals
Not all ""libcucks"" are exactly the same.
in that it can be changed, through legislation
And crimes can also be forgiven and sentences overturned.
Don't tell me you're not in favor of all of Trump's pardons. Are you??
this was for you
Happy?
Of course, I concede did an undeniably dumb thing by react to a statement without distinguishing between green and red text. No need for either of you to be peeved because the fault was clearly mine and it was humiliating, obvious, and life-questioning.
I just tried wax for the first tie 2 minutes ago. Did a double dose. The keyboard feels tingly.
And crimes can also be forgiven and sentences overturned
right, after going through the legal system, not by ignoring criminals and letting them walk free
Don't tell me you're not in favor of all of Trump's pardons. Are you??
some yes, some no, same as all Presidents
...Who applied as someone whose status would automatically ban him from applying.
I just tried wax for the first tie 2 minutes ago
Lol what the hell is wax?
apparently not, because liberals are ok with people committing crimes and not being arrested, they even direct police to not arrest criminals
Did your home boy Trump just pardon a bunch of violent rioters? And haven't several of those violent rioters gone on to do more crime like killing people and pedophilia?
right, after going through the legal system
Granting citizenship = going thought the legal system, you fuckin tard.
some yes, some no, same as all Presidents
Gee, I wonder which ones you're in favor of.
Dumb-O-KKKraps dont belove there flag they only salute the FAG kek
Wax marijuana, also known as THC wax or cannabis wax, is a highly concentrated form of cannabis that contains up to 90% THC. It has a sticky texture and is typically consumed by dabbing, vaporizing, or mixing with other cannabis products.
(Of course, I failed captcha twice.)
Granting citizenship = going thought the legal system, you fuckin tard.
when did I say otherwise?
and coming into the country illegally is not following the legal process
leave and try doing it legally next time
Listen to this music and ascend
when did I say otherwise?
Granting an illegal immigrant citizenship would be an example of "going through the legal system"
How are you this fucking dense?
At least he correctly refereed to him as a rioter. Everything after words like "allegedly", is almost 100% fake news, in a modern journo piece. They can say what the fuck ever they want after that,
MAGAt wants everyone to believe that the violent rioter who stormed the Capitol to defend a pedophile - most probably isn't a pedophile
hmmm
Granting an illegal immigrant citizenship would be an example of "going through the legal system"
no it wouldn't, if they were going through the legal process they wouldn't be here illegally
Trump just pardon a bunch of violent rioters?
the ones that just walked around and didn't steal or damage anything should be pardoned
the rest shouldn't have been
gone on to do more crime like killing people and pedophilia?
then lock them up
ICE has deported more US citizens in the last 5 years than there are cases of voter fraud over the last 50 years. If you're worried about voter fraud then you should be worried about ICE deporting Americans.
no it wouldn't
Lol yes it would. How do you think the people would be granted citizenship? Do you think it's magic? Sorcery? Do you think a fairy sprinkles dust on them, rendering their status "legal?"
the ones that just walked around and didn't steal or damage anything
Yeah, we should just be able to waltz into private government offices whenever we feel like it, especially after forcing entry into the building.
Amazing how you tough-on-crime types instantly turn into dindus whenever it involves your team.
Name a single group of humans that doesn't have pados? It's a completely pointless metric. Pure propaganda that's been used to death.
ICE has deported more US citizens in the last 5 years than there are cases of voter fraud over the last 50 years.
all that confirms is that there is very little voter fraud
If you're worried about voter fraud then you should be worried about ICE deporting Americans
both are concerning, what is this line of argument?
if a US citizen gets deported we shouldn't deport anyone anymore? that's retarded
what's the error % here?
How do you think the people would be granted citizenship?
someone going through the legal process of gaining citizenship isn't an illegal, you retard
they would have legal status at that point, and have paperwork t prove it
someone going through the legal process of gaining citizenship isn't an illegal
AN ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT BEING GRANTED CITIZENSHIP IS A LEGAL PROCESS NO MATTER WHAT SPECIFIC PATH IS TAKEN, YOU MOTHERFUCKING RETARD.
just let me drive illegally officer, I swear I'll get my license next week, let me drive illegally for now
any "specific path" they take does not involve them being an illegally alien at any point in the process
get the fuck out, and come in through the front door legally next time
I'm sorry that you have shockingly low standards and maybe even worse - sincerely believe that the fucking White House is "just" like any other group of humans.
Some people don't like to be shot by cops and some don't like cops getting off scot-free for murder. Some don't want to admit it is happening Some people don't like being denied a job because of their race. Some people are uptight because ALL of history might be taught.
You sound like a fucking niggerhater, cleetus. what the fuck, man?
Some people don't like to be shot by cops and some don't like cops getting off scot-free for murder.
most everyone
Some don't want to admit it is happening
police unions
Some people don't like being denied a job because of their race.
literally everyone except white people on the extreme left who have white guilt and would rather the job they applied for be given to a non-white
False equivalence.
If you're not allowed to operate a vehicle, it's because of 1 of 3 reasons: 1. You haven't proven that you possess the necessary skills or knowledge to operate a vehicle, 2. You're too young to drive, or 3. You've proven yourself to be a danger on the road. Whatever the case, we prevent certain people from driving in order to prevent accidents.
The immigration system is a bit more complex.
Do you really think you're convincing anyone or is this just mental masturbation for idiots?
Which party was the conservative party then? Party names mean nothing, its all about political ideology...unless you're retarded.
any "specific path" they take does not involve them being an illegally alien at any point
It does if they're granted citizenship after being here illegally for a period of time.
How long are you going to keep doing this to yourself? Maybe just throw in the towel, dude.
But if you're here illegally but then granted citizenship, isn't the crime of being here illegally still count?
False equivalence.
no, it is exactly the same
it's because of 1 of 3 reasons
you forgot the only one that actually matters, that being not having a valid license to operate a vehicle on public roads, i.e. a driver's license, short of maybe a medical emergency of driving someone to a hospital you are not allowed to drive without a license
just like you're not allowed to be in this country without a legal status of some kind, like a visa
The immigration system is a bit more complex.
not really, there's just more acceptable legal statuses and they take longer to get
but in both cases of you don't have the legal documentation you are breaking the law
and a system being complex is no excuse for refusing to follow it
isn't the crime of being here illegally still count?
Crimes can be forgiven. And I've gone over scenarios in which they should be forgiven multiple times throughout this thread, and I'm definitely not gonna rehash it.
Hey watch this everybody. Watch OP lose his shit:
The southern strategy happened during the 1960s, and basically both parties switched sides
It does if they're granted citizenship after being here illegally for a period of time.
why would some grant an illegal citizenship? that's not how citizenship works
How long are you going to keep doing this to yourself?
do you have like zero self-awareness?
dangerously based
Crimes can be forgiven.
by going through the courts
I've gone over scenarios in which they should be forgiven
which aren't valid
RepubliKKKlans are the real racists
Correct.
no, it is exactly the same
No, it's not.
you forgot the only one that actually matters, that being not having a valid license to operate a vehicle on public roads, i.e. a driver's license, short of maybe a medical emergency of driving someone to a hospital you are not allowed to drive without a license
Lol you're not even coherent at this point.
but in both cases of you don't have the legal documentation you are breaking the law......
Yeah, we've been over this. I'm not gonna get into it again.
Lol you're not even coherent at this point
you're ESL, aren't you?
bunch of worthless walls of text
Cope of a desperate man
Doesn't mean anything, it's another african lineage like dinka or mota, this doesn't deny anything of what i said
This desperate argument has already been adressed, the study specified that it isnt just another african but distinguishable from all ssas in a similar fashion to OOA.
ike the mota:
Specifically, the divergence of the Mota
Something i already adressed mota is assigned as a sub-saharan altough one that closer to ooa tha the rest, meanwhile takarkori is firmly distinguished from them considered even closer to OOA
"This unknown North African population is closely related to OoA populations and branches off the lineage leading to OoA later than the ancient individual from Mota Cave"
Basically all this here has already been even more extensively adressed if you actually cared to read previous post instead of desperately regurgitating statements with no meaningful substance.
it's related to sub saharan african actually, pic rel, somalis have more negative f4 stats when compared to zlaty kun
This is meaningless when you take into consideration that somalis have large amounts of post OOA ancestry so it will appearl closer to zlaty kun in formal stats compared takarkori whose post OOA ancestry is in the single digits at best. However when you compare takarkori to another group like taforalt which has large amounts of post-OOA ancestry it isnt any closer to SSA than them but equal distance, it doesnt make sense that takarkori should be more african than taforalt but as distant to SSA as them
"Suggesting that these groups are equally distant from both the Takarkori and Taforalt groups"
Problem is here is the contrast of comparison you must include SSA not just post OOA the deal isnt takarkori being more african than somalis as much it just doesnt have as much post OOA ancestry otherwise it would appear closer to ssa compared to taforalt.
I have btfod you now begone slime
by going through the courts
Right, which is what would happen if we decide to grant certain illegal immigrants citizenship.
Dude, please stop, I'm actually starting to feel bad for you.
butbutbut muh robert byrd!!!!
Some people don't like to be shot by cops and some don't like cops getting off scot-free for murder.
So then I'm sure you would agree that Michael Byrd should be investigated and charged for the wanton shooting of an unarmed woman .
if we decide to grant certain illegal immigrants citizenship.
why would we do that? they're here illegally, and refused to go through the process of obtaining citizenship the legal way
I'm actually starting to feel bad for you.
because I don't want to make a bunch of illegals into citizens? what?
I point out reasons why we have a thing called a driver's license
"durrrr you forgot the only one that matters, and that's having a license because the law and legality and legal stuff"
if you don't have a valid license, you are not legally allowed to drive, nothing else matters
if you are not here legally, you should be deported
if you want to become a citizen then you can apply for it, but until then, get the fuck out
basically both parties switched sides
If that were even remotely true then right-wingers would now revere those "former" Democrat heroes who are now controversial like Margaret Sanger, Robert Byrd, and so many various others. And yet they do not, and the Left still do revere those people (perhaps somewhat less openly and vocally than they used to, but still) thus proving that there never was this mythical "party swap".
why would we do that?
We've been over this. Feel free to go through my posts again.
because I don't want to make a bunch of illegals into citizens?
Because you've been getting brutally btfo at virtually every turn throughout this entire thread.
because the law
correct, if you don't have a license, you cannot drive
age and experience mean nothing, you could have been a professional truck driver for 40 years, if you don't have a current valid license, you are not allowed to drive on the road, and you will find yourself in front a judge if you're pulled over by a cop and you don't have a valid license, it's not that complicated
the examples you brought up have to do with the license, if you're too young you can't get one, if you've been determined to be a danger on the roads, they take it away
the valid license is the only thing in play here, if you don't have a valid license, you can't drive
just like legal immigration status, you're either here legally or you aren't, and if you aren't, you get deported
But Republicans do revere Jefferson Finis Davis and always downplay Abraham Lincoln. I wonder why..........................
Because you've been getting brutally btfo
I can't imagine living my life with the amount of delusion you suffer from, it must be so disorienting to think the world is completely different than it really is, or maybe it's freeing because you can just invent any reality you like
if you don't have a valid license, you are not legally allowed to drive, nothing else matters
But that's not true. If you couldn't obtain a license because you're, say, a Mormon... this would be a problem imo.
Do you understand where I was coming from now? The reasons for the rules and regulations matter - and given the complicated nature of the immigration system, I think certain exceptions can be made for people who aren't here legally.
if you are not here legally, you should be deported. if you want to become a citizen then you can apply for it, but until then, get the fuck out
Broken record.
Feel free to check out any time, man
Broken record. Nothing new. Nothing worth responding to.
No u
But Republicans do revere Jefferson Finis Davis and always downplay Abraham Lincoln. I wonder why..........................
Trump said that Lincoln and Jackson were his favorite presidents and he had their portraits placed in the oval office. He never said a thing in support of Jefferson Davis, however. I can't think of even a single Republican that ever has. It should be worth noting however, that Jimmy Carter (a Democrat who only just recently died) helped Jefferson Davis be rehabilitated and issued him a pardon or something.
Trump isn't a Republican even though he's running under the Republican party. He's literally the dear leader of MAGA cult. Very obviously different anon.
How to save dogs.
shitbulls/bully breeds
Humanely euthanize any dog that is more than 1/8 pitbull. And nobody cares about the difference between a English toddler muncher and an American bone cruncher. Put an end to these unstable and dangerous bully breeds.
molossers/mastiffs
Slobbering, ugly, brutish, and stupid beasts. Eradicate this breed, it represents everything bad about dogs - incessant barking, drooling, oafishness, doggy odor, ability to maul humans. They were developed to be chained outside as deterrents or used as weapons until they die at 6 years old of bone cancer.
LGDs
Only people who have farms/ranches with significant amounts of livestock should own these dogs. And those with overwhelming molosser DNA still have to go.
terriers, herding dogs, gun dogs
Fix their OCD and hyperactivity. This would likely end up with dogs that are less inclined to recall and listen to your every command without sufficient motivators (immediate food reward). But, all primitive dogs are like that, being independent companions. It's strange for any animal (domesticated or not) to obey your every command for free.
brachecephaly, bowed legs, bobtails, droopy lips, achondroplasia, skin folds, oily hair, apple heads, stilted hind legs, roach backs, exophthalmos, long and droopy ears
Put them out of their misery. Make it illegal to select for these traits.
toy breeds
Make them weigh 10 pounds at least. Small dogs aren't that bad when you actually train them like you would a big dog, and address their genetic aberrations, like toad muzzles or apple skulls.
After all this is done, start selecting for the longest lived and healthiest dogs.
Trump isn't a Republican even though he's running under the Republican party.
And yet you insist that the guy who tried to assassinate him is a Republican, even though he donated to ActBlue. Your "logic" (assuming there is any) is contradictory.
Very weird of you to be so fucking edgy and butthurt about simple facts anon. Anyways the facts don't care about your obviously unfiltered dogshit feelings, traitor-kun.
it's ok to break the law if you don't agree with it
no argument
concession accepted
Trump is the leader of the movement he created
no fucking shit
in other news, water is indeed wet
So you agree with me :)
it's ok to pardon people sometimes
it's ok to grant people citizenship who were in the country illegally at one time
Ftfy
no argument
I already provided all the arguments. Not gonna go through them again.
I don't think you'll find anyone to disagree that Trump is the leader of MAGA, considering he invented it
Then I accept your concession with grace, anon.
>it's ok to pardon people sometimes
correct
it's ok to grant people citizenship who were in the country illegally at one time
it is, if they go through the legal citizenship process
but until they actually have legal status they need to leave the country
provided all the arguments
you don't have any arguments, all you've said is that we should give citizenship to illegals, which is an absurd take
there's a reason there's a legal immigration process, people need to be vetted, not everyone should be given citizenship just because they want it, that's ridiculous
what was conceded, exactly? do you even know what that word means?
You've basically just been repeating yourself for the past hour. What do you think this is going to achieve? Is it based on a desire to get the last word, or do you think you get 4channel points for each word you type?
Wasn't murder. Doing his duty. Gave ample warnings multiple times. Literally the world saw it on video. FAFO became famous.
If it were up to me, all of you fucking Jan6 traitors would be swinging on ropes.
If you've ever been around blacks en masse, you'd know why segregation is necessary. Even blacks prefer to be segregated from us, provided we still support them.
Wasn't murder. Doing his duty. Gave ample warnings multiple times. Literally the world saw it on video. FAFO became famous.
These sum up pretty much every case which BLM riots over. In short, you're a hypocrite. You're probably black and so you only care when cops kill people who look like you, but are fine with it when it happens to anyone else even under similar circumstances.
If it were up to me, all of you fucking Jan6 traitors would be swinging on ropes.
The world has really done a number on you. I was just wishing they'd gone on a blood rampage and taken out a whole lot of top government officials, but we can't always get what we want.
You're probably black
close, jewish
niggers don't care about jan 6
niggers don't care about jan 6
True, but they celebrate the fact a black man killed a white woman. They don't care about any specifics about it beyond that, but that much they do care about.
jewish
Ron Goldman was Jewish and he was murdered by OJ Simpson. And black people celebrate this plus the fact he was acquitted. No reasonable person doubts OJ's guilt in that case. His DNA confirmed it, but the black members of the jury wanted him acquitted, and so he was.
it's okay when Rightoids violently riot and get people killed
i wish rightoids would understand that no one honestly takes them seriously when you guys pretend to be sincere like this
At least the Rightoid Rioters identified the correct target on Jan 6, even if they failed to enact Leftoid levels of violence in doing so in order to accomplish anything. Leftoids on the other hand enacted unrestrained violence, but misdirected against whatever small businesses happened to be in the vicinity. A few lives and livelihoods were ruined by the Left's riots, but nothing constructive was achieved by it.
This is why neither the Right nor the Left ever achieve anything. The Right are too restrained in their approach; and the Left are too stupid to direct their lack of restraint to the correct target.