Trump's top officials shared secret war plans in chat that included journalist
In an accidental leak, Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, was included in a chat among top security officials on secret war plans.
Just one of many unqualified lackeys in trump's cabinet. Total amateurs.
Trump's top officials shared secret war plans in chat that included journalist
Based.
Also very cool of Jeffrey Goldberg to keep a lot of the info to himself,even after the mission was over.
Goldberg
>accidental leak
Top keks
was SecDef Drunk?
Yeah. Total stupidity on Hegseth's part. This is not a small matter; it's a major security breach. It's what you get when you appoint people who are loyal as opposed to qualified.
would it even make a difference? dude's a total fucking retard drunk or sober
Get him the fuck out of office. This is not just a rookie mistake, this is incompetence. He should resign.
Send him to El Salvador!
It's incompetence, regardless. But it sure would be funny.
Hire clowns, expect a circus.
Look for more major mistakes from the Trump cabinet in the future. It's what happens when you appoint people who don't have a clue as to what they're doing. I'm waiting for RFK Jr. to make a dick of himself soon.
THE BEST PEOPLE
kek
America is so fucked
In an accidental leak
If you think this was accidental and not intentional by the same people who told us Trump was a Russian asset for 8 years, then you need to kill yourself in real life.
here's how this is actually the liberal's fault
Give it a rest. One of the dumbest replies I've seen in a long time.
weird all those people upset about hunters laptop and hillary's email server aren't saying shit about this, maybe their internet is down?
Trump's top officials shared secret war plans in chat that included journalist
sure dipshit, if you believe for one second that Pete Hegseth, Marco Rubio, Mike Walz and JD Vance randomly and carelessly added this rabid fucking anti-Trump journalist to a “classified” group chat…you live up to every expectation of a liberal.
t. cnn watcher
Nice diversion. The topic is the incompetence of trump's national security team, not Biden or Clinton. They invited a reporter to discuss secret war plans on a non-secure app. This isn't a tiny mistake as you'll see in the coming days. This is a major league fuck up.
No, just a damn stupid reply.
They are shameless hypocrites with no integrity. They root for a team so they can't be objective, and their complaints are only insincere complaints that reinforce us vs them.
The topic is
libs deflecting while doing the same thing they did from 2016 to 2020
Every news agency is running the story, Fox included. What is your problem?
complaints that reinforce us vs them.
proceeds to reinforce us vs them
Literal doublethink. What's hypocritical for your political opponents is perfectly fine when your party does it.
Kill yourself.
The fuck are you talking about? They never did anything this stupid.
When did the Dems have a security breach as stupid as this one? You're pissed that it happened and it makes trump's cabinet look incompetent which they are. This incident is not going away soon.
How would you like this interpreted? Literally Trump is deporting anyone who is here legally but aren't citizens that disagree with him. He is suing newspapers for reporting that polls said he'd lose. His supporters (you probably) will never criticized him and pile on Democrays for the same thing Republicans do. It's all Republicans, not a segment like Democrats, and it's purely an us vs them mindset - it's why "owning the libs" is the mantra, it's a sport not objective thinking intended to improve the world. If you don't see it you are for sure in the cult.
And you live down to every expectation of a Maga retard
Oh no, how dare they reveal bureaucratic speculations about things that are never going to happen.
Or maybe its because speculating about something that will probably never happen is completely different than giving away info on active wars or documenting your own crimes on your computer and leaving it at the repair shop.
So they did nothing wrong, is that what you're saying?
They are career bureaucrats, their entire lifestyle is wrong
That has nothing to do with the topic.
bureaucratic speculations about things that are never going to happen.
Except it wasn't bureaucratic speculation, it was very specific detailed operation plans.
Wrong, you asked if they do anything wrong when pretty much everything they do is wrong.
They didn't do anything that actively compromised actual soldiers lives in a real conflict like Hillary's leaks, if that is what you mean.
No matter how specific it was, it was still just some bureaucrats' speculatory wargames.
And you know this how? You're trying to minimize the gross incompetence of people entrusted with high level security making rookie mistakes like inviting a reporter to the discussion and using a non-secure system. This isn't a small blunder.
I am just trying to exaggerate bad things about people I don't like, why won't you help me?
We'll see if it's an exaggeration in the
following days. This is a big fuck up and you know it so you try to downplay it but that's not going to work.
He's in a cult but the leader will never speak to him while he pours money, power, and support into the leaders pocket.
Except you already admitted you don't even know and you are just amplifying the story because you want to exaggerate the failing of people you never liked to begin with.
the cult member reposting a story from some corporate think tank
The damage is done, dipshit. It’s open and shut. They invited a reporter to a secret security meeting on a non-secure system. See, when it comes to national security this is not supposed to happen. Very lax and sloppy protocol. I have no need for exaggeration, the facts are right there.
I have no need for exaggeration
Except of course for the part where you call a bunch of bureaucrats speculating about random unclassified stuff on their time off as a secret security meeting.
buh buh biden!
buh buh hillary!
You have no idea what they were discussing, why are you pretending you do? On their time off? It was a scheduled meeting. They fucked up, you know it, and this won’t be swept under the rug.
This is a wild take
I bet it will be China's fault for making the smartphone
pretending
That is what happens when you introduce imaginationland by exaggerating and implying instead of actually offering real evidence.
Sure they fucked up by letting people know what they are speculating in private, but its not nearly as bad as hillary for leaving active plans or hunter for leaking evidence of his financial crimes.
Oh wow, you called it
see
He didn't call anything, he referenced what already happened ITT.
No secret war plans actually shared
More liberal lying bullshit
You guys are utterly evil people who lie about everything
You’re a waste of time. You compare Hunter Biden's computer stupidity to a national security breach? We’re done.
Because nothing was leaked. There was no classified info at all. You can look up the transcript.
This is just more lying bullshit from liberals, and dumb people like you fall for it every fucking time.
No, dipshit, made the comparison and I was saying why it was wrong, lurk more and learn to read.
Except that there was no security breach at all. Nothing classified was shared. This is just more democrat lying.
defend accidentally texting a journalist top secret military plans
How would you know what was shared, asshole? The editor or the Atlantic knew about the bombings in Yemen hours before they occurred because they mistaking invited him to the chat. That’s a serious security breach by any standard. Also, using a non-secured system. Sorry, you can’t play this off as “not a big deal”.
No top secret military plans were shared. You are lying.
Because the complete transcript is available.
Provide a leak for the transcript you lying sack of shit.
So, here is the extend of the "leak"
Some leftist pentagon staffer added a far left journalist to a group convo among Sec Def, the VP, and other top brass. (This will likely result in prison time for the person who violated opsec in this manner).
The extend of the convo was "the president gave the go ahead and the Euros are a bunch of faggots"
So, more bullshit hysteria from the left about a nothing burger.
Say "please"
i'm lying, riiiiight
lol, ok shillboy
serious question for you: is there anything you wouldn't defend for trump daddy?
Do you have access to a transcript? By all means post a link. That’s not going to happen, is it? Idiot.
he's right, and you're lying. MSM says you're lying. Everyone except the jew journalist says you're lying.
Parrots DNC talking points
Calls someone else a shill
kek
And this text contained operational military information, including the time that bombs were supposed to start dropping on Yemen. And this was two hours before that time. So I simply waited and stared at my phone.
And, sure enough, the attack, the American attack on Yemen began to be felt at about 1:30 Eastern or so, 1:50 Eastern. And that's when I realized that the chain was real. Until that point, I really had a deep suspicion that I was being spoofed or hoaxed or being led astray on a disinformation campaign, the rationale for which I can't figure out.
Is there any lie wouldn't try to amplify just to defame someone in the opposite political party?
So make it available if you have the link. Go ahead, you can shut all of us up. I’ll wait.
apnews.com
lol shills spazzing out in damage control mode
but her emails!?
well??
Dems are the shills, retard, and you know it. They literally pay pajeets like you to post this garbage here. Nobody believes you.
pretty late in DC isn't it JD?
proof: imadeitup.com
so if the same thing had happened under biden, also totally chill?
The leak was started by Michael Walz, the national security advisor, by inviting Goldberg from the Atlantic to the chat. You obviously are just making shit up trying to minimize the stupidity of members of Trump’s cabinet. That’s just not going to work this time.
You’re up pretty late for a retard.
Under biden, when they fucked up, they would just would lie about it constantly and threaten and scream at the press behind the scenes to successfully suppress the story.
It was a much bigger fuck up when Trump let the coronavirus leak from the lab they were running in China and killed millions of people, but you DNC shills never talk about that since you are all in on the jab.
Talk about a DEI hire. I'm sure there are many women and black men more qualified than this donkey.
holy cringe, you shills are so inauthentic it hurts. ESL or just out of touch, but jesus, you're bad.
Still waiting for a link to that transcript. Odd how Trumptards never back up what they say.
No, we are waiting on you to prove that any important military plans were leaked like you claimed and all you can do is try to turn the table because you have nothing yourself.
Trump shilling on overdrive.
In all fairness, he has no idea what happened. Hasn't even looked into it. Just saw the DNC talking points and came here to parrot them like a good little shill.
He doesn't know the real story and doesn't care in the slightest. He has a narrative that he can use against the enemies of his political tribe, and that is literally all that he cares about. Truth and facts aren't important to him.
Projection
You came here with claims, have nothing to back them up, and now are demanding an annotated thesis from people who called out your bullshit.
You people are just straight up amoral and evil.
WATCH WHAT YOU SAY ABOUT DOGE!
youtu.be
You mentioned there’s a transcript, not me. All you have to do is post the link, why are you hesitating? If it proves that no real damage was done why wouldn’t you share it? Could it be that you’re totally full of shit?
scream at the press behind the scenes
Psychosis is setting in.
There is no transcript, Skippy. Just more lies with no substance as we’ve come to expect from Trumptards.
Lies about something people can easily find with a web search
kek
You shills are fucking pathetic.
I'm in a cult and have zero interest in facts
.
Here’s the results for your link, retard
Two whole replies before we complained about jews. Anon Babble is sleepy tonight.
Is that why the biden admin screamed at mark zuckerberg and other members of the media to suppress information on facebook and other platforms because their psychosis was setting in?
thehill.com
Produce a link. I’ve asked repeatedly but no one seems to have it. Give us a link and shut us up. Why are you hesitating?
Lol, did you read anything?
They were saying in the chat exactly which units would carry out the strikes with which weapons/aircraft and at what times (which the reporter redacted from the transcripts he published). The reporter was basically scanning Twitter at the expected time, waiting for reports of explosions in Sana'a and sure enough, boom.
Just repeating what every news agency is saying. If you have evidence to refute them please provide it.
nypost.com
did you read anything?
you're talking to a trumphick. the answer is no, not never, in his entire life
DAMAGE CONTROL DEFCON ZERO
go to bed, JD
Trump's finished this time
in any sane country, yes
sadly, hicks take a long time to get it though
I still think we should have funded that transgender clinic in India. It's one of the best ways to cut their birthrate and undermine their population.
Strange how when you ask Trumptards for any type proof to back up their statements they suddenly disappear.
So you do have a transcript that proves OP's claims?
So no clear plans just a bunch of I wish this, I hope that, but daddy trump actually gets to make the call?
...and they still play the same old bullshitting games
the Convicted Criminal in Chief :
"I don't know anything about it"
oookay
didn't expect him to ever read his daily briefings
or to even know what he is talking about
as he sleeps till noon and spends most of his working time watching TV and posting on Social Media
while the economy tanks and Putin wins
"The plan included precise information about weapons packages, targets, and timing."
Sorry your mother drank so much when pregnant with you bro.
Sure, it wasn't worth putting in the transcript you just posted, but it totally happened.
sure
didn't expect reptards to understand what they read
inb4 post war plans here or it never happened
The quote you provided wasn't in the image you posted, but don't worry, nobody expects a shill to be consistent and factual.
Sorry this wasn't an academic paper. Honestly you wouldn't be able to understand it anyway, with the autism snd fetal alcohol syndrome your mom gave you.
No, I clearly understood all to well that your transcript didn't actually contain what you said it did which is why you are getting so mad now and trying to change the subject and turn the tables.
You have the reading comprehension of a toddler
*too
I don't want all these facts and links to news sites that even include a Murdoch one. I want an academic paper and will accept nothing less!
image
boring boy, there's a full link to the original article
reptards can't read
and btw
we're more than one in here trying to tell you..
No, the text you quoted is clearly not in the image you posted, I don't need to comprehend the text to see that there is not a match with what you posted and what was in the image you said was the transcript.
It doesn't need to be an academic paper, the words you are posting just needs to match the words in the image you are claiming is the transcript you are quoting.
there's a full link to the original article
The link is not a transcript it is an editorial by a journalist. The image is supposedly a snapshot of the the transcript itself, but it doesn't even say anything you quoted or anything the journalist mentioned in the editorial, there are no leaks of military plans, its just a few people speculating and saying that its ultimately trump's decision.
"I am not sure the president is aware how inconsistent this is with his message on Europe right now. There’s a further risk that we see a moderate to severe spike in oil prices. I am willing to support the consensus of the team and keep these concerns to myself. But there is a strong argument for delaying this a month, doing the messaging work on why this matters, seeing where the economy is, etc."
Vance on the attack
Anything and everything the Trump administration does is smart and perfect. I don't see any problems here
That's not me though, but enjoy spitting into the wind.
Enjoy defending an obvious liar with even more retarded bullshit than he could have come up with on his own.
It's what you get when you appoint people who are loyal as opposed to qualified.
true
personally, i miss the expertise of former Secretary of Transportation "Anal" Pete Bootyjudge, who brought his extensive experience in logistics as...uh, mayor of a small midwest city, to the office
well, maybe he had been a small-time mayor, but he went to Harvard, damnit, where he majored in transportation policy...wait, no sorry, he actually majored in literature
but transportation and literature both begin with consonants, so there's probably overlap
at any rate, i'm sure it was "Anal" Pete's extensive qualifications and experience in transportation that led to his Cabinet appointment and not the fact that he dropped out of the Democratic primary and endorsed Joe Biden
Fox News political commentator Brit Hume on Monday afternoon pushed back on Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s claim that “nobody was texting war plans” after news broke that Hegseth and other Trump administration officials discussed plans for an attack against Houthi rebels in Yemen on a text chain that mistakenly included the editor-in-chief for The Atlantic.
“Nobody was texting war plans, and that’s all I have to say about that,” Hegseth said outside a plane in Hawaii when asked about editor-in-chief of The Atlantic Jeffrey Goldberg’s access to the chat.
Hume reposted a video of Hegseth’s comments on the platform X, saying, “Oh for God’s sake, the administration has already confirmed the authenticity of the message.”
When Goldberg asked Brian Hughes, a spokesperson for the National Security Council, for comment, he responded, “This appears to be an authentic message chain, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain.”
boring boy
trying to be funny...
don't pretend you even understand what
is an editorial
You mad?
REPORTER: Mr. President, your reaction to the story, The Atlantic, that said that some of your top cabinet officials and aides have been discussing very sensitive material through Signal and included an Atlantic reporter for that. What is your response to that and are you going to take it –
TRUMP: I don’t know anything about it. I’m not a big fan of The Atlantic. To me, it’s a magazine that’s going out of business. I think it’s not much of a magazine, but I know nothing about it. You’re saying that they had what?
REPORTER: They were using Signal to coordinate on sensitive materials, and –
TRUMP: Having to do with what? Having to do with what? What were they talking about?
REPORTER: The Houthis.
TRUMP: With the Houthis. You mean the attack on the Houthis? Well, it couldn’t have been very effective because the attack was very effective, I can tell you that. I don’t know anything about it. You’re telling me about it for the first time?
I DONT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IT motherfucker thats WORSE, how the fuck do you not realize that you fucktard
Why wouldn't smart honest people get mad that a hoard of retarded people like you get off on defending liars with a never ending parade of the stupidest lies possible?
Ironic lol
don't pretend you even understand what
>is an editorial
....when you think screenshots of a Signal chat (already confirmed as authentic) are
supposedly a snapshot of the the transcript itself
boring boy is gone..
screenshots of a Signal chat
None of those screenshots say because that specific text was lifted from the editorial portion rather than the transcript.
It's funny how many people are so dumb that they think battle plans weren't already decided 2 hours within the attack time, and that this wasn't strategically leaked to act as good press.
How are all liberals this clueless to strategic thinking?
TRUMP: With the Houthis. You mean the attack on the Houthis? Well, it couldn’t have been very effective because the attack was very effective, I can tell you that.
Wait, does Trump the The Atlantic failed to prevent the US attack on the Houthis? Is that what he's saying? Christ he's retarded.
The Atlantic is notoriously pro-Houthi
You're calling others retarded when you can't tell what was said? Oh boy lol. Libshits keep on losing.
2 hours
ookay, you didn't read the report, or you pretend you don't understand
But DoD incompetence will be just another reason to protest when Republican voters are holding “empty chair” town halls in Red districts - which are pretty much all over the place. This weekend we’ve got reports in Columbus, Ohio, for Sens. Moreno and Husted, on Maryland’s eastern shore, where Rep. Jamie Raskin (D) had to show up in place of Rep. Andy Harris (R), in Little Rock for Rep. French Hill, Sen. Tom Cotton and Sen. John Boozman, and in Lexington for Rep. Andy Barr. In Billings, nearly 1,000 showed up for no-shows Sen. Daines, Sen. Sheehy and Rep. Downing, and about 300 came for Daines, Sheehy and Rep. Zinke in Missoula. People turned out in Fairbanks, Juneau, Anchorage and other towns in Alaska for no-shows Rep. Begich and Sen. Sullivan. Another big turnout for no-show Rep. Darrell Issa outside San Diego. More “empty chair” town halls in Indiana, with no-shows from Sen. Banks, Sen. Young and Rep. Stutzman. (Banks sent donuts.)
the boooring troll army is retiring
jews.