CELEB AI (FREE SPEECH EDITION)

or Wilford Brimley

MM would have been epic as an AI.

These threads got to see far too little of the hotties from criticalrole...
Roll a D20 for sadness

Nobody (but you) knows (nor cares) who the fuck they are.

Nope
Also miss the few times there were lewd threads just for them that would last an entire day
They dont get much love but when they do...all the horny kinky nerds join in

I don’t know what a criticalrole is.

Is it a show?

Not really.
The law on false light, misappropriation, etc. are the guiding principle here

Can you post some of those AI pics of them?

Please explain further

Emrata gens?

alex morgan too, so many athletic women would be amazing for this

Blacks and Jews, etc, could easily argue false light and misappropriation laws, too.

Why should it just apply to and protect a class of elite celebrities?

What about those super hot blonde college gymnasts?

Never mind. I googled it.

Political meme-ing and elections will never be the same. It’s ogre. All the fun in life has been crushed away.

only caring about Trump eroding the constitution when it threatens to take away ai slop fake tits and ai slop racist caricatures

if any of you are older than 16 you should be very embarrassed to be you

literally what else matters you soapboxing negroid

I need some desert Padmé. Any outfit you want.

only caring about Trump eroding the constitution when it threatens to take away ai slop fake tits and ai slop racist caricatures

Please explain what other ways he has eroded 1A this significantly during his admins.

We’ll wait.

can't think of any by name but yeah them too

in my defense, I've been embarrassed to be me way before ai was a thing

soapboxing negroid

Kek

just put 500 on trump not signing this unconstitutional law via polymarket and you should too if you like free money

quit counter signaling your bets you jew

Will including a flag in the metadata suffice? imo watermarking is too great a burden against speech.

What are the rules on faceswap?

Olivia Dunne

Anyone got AI gens of her?

Same shit I think.

tried her but the Lora wasn't great

Billion percent guaranteed he will sign it.

Celebs will kiss his ass and thank him. Taylor Swift will probably blow him. AOC, too.

Then he’ll give the secret nod to SCOTUS and they will nuke the law to smithereens.

Bros, this is the answer. Make your little nudie girl however you want, right. Bewbs, no bush, whateva. Then before you post this girl for the Yous all that you gotta do is run it through a cartoon wash or art style. Make that bish an illustrious toon, then post. Completely safe, falls into parody amonst other things and you can make some damn sexy cartoons these days. People like the toons, see it for what it is, and if you wanna make an expiring catbox for the unaltered image, so be it stud

Next groups such as Jews, Blacks, Muslims and gays will argue that derogatory parody and satire of them hurt their feelings, too, and should be outlawed

NEWS FLASH:
They've been doing that for decades.

Shit. She’s epically cute.

Seriously try it. Take one of your premade waifus then run her through an animated wash, presto posto

America doesn't have free speech any more. It's actually sad. People will talk shit about China but the USA cucked itself for the jews.

NO NUDIFYING ANYONE ANYMORE EITHER

Those apps will get taken down as soon as the bill is signed

If anyone wants to break their cherry on this concept Id like to nominate Elle as the spacemonkey first try

Nudify is rape. Cartoonify is legal. Its how those degen threads stay steady. Toons are immune to this bill

And now they will have a brand new legal precedent to finally do it. Can’t do it just for celebs, and then not do it for them.

All these chst bros voted for this what will yall do when they start banning porn on general because this is just the beginning just a 100 days who knows where we'll be by end of year 2?

such a perfect fuckdoll, would have love to have seen her in a gang rape situation

Nobody wants fucking cartoons, dude

I've seen no one outside outwardly proclaim having any issue with this law. Why would they nuke it? Also four of the SCOTUS are women, and one's a nigress at that.Good luck.

who is this

not a single gen

Then suffer without the attention from fans. Most of us are fine without this dopamine

I mean threads that were not ai stuff

Yes
It's a group of voice actors / actors who play dungeons and dragons

And fuck you chuds, many many people enjoy lewd cartoons

requesting sabrina carpenter, ella purnell or sydney sweeney

Project 2025 wants to ban all porn like are we gonna end up Like Iran? When will it be the the end? Another 200 days where will the first amendment come down to? I get the celebs but onlyfans next? Any nudity? Who will stop them if they want to do this ?

Sure
I do
Got any Tinkerbell worshipping a cock twice her size ?

Requesting

Not a celeb. Sorry, i clicked on the wrong thread.
i'll go now.

post more nigger

I do but the cocks are black unfortunately, got some with her and a snake if you prefer

I need both

Oh wait found one. Fuckigottacleanupthesefolders. Just been so lazy I dump everything into the without sub foldering

Well, the new bill/law is unconstitutional and therefore illegal.

Historically, the SCOTUS has slavishly adhered to protecting the absolute letter of the Constitution at all costs—their genders, politics and personal opinions aside.

I suppose a day may come when they stop protecting the Constitution.

Maybe this topic, the fake visualization of Taylor Swift’s pussy getting stretched by a monstrous black cock, will finally be so crucial, that the SOCTUS will turn their backs on defending the Constitution.

We’ll see.

Unfortunately I will be the average Iranians when it came down to this because I will not be fighting back, its the independent voters who have to stand up when they ban all nudity or porn for the record ill pet it happen and won't be fighting for it sorry yeah might be a cuck but im sitting back this is not my fight yzll voted and don't wanna be sent to el salv I'm all on with what ever let the record show. This is yall fight

Fucking awesome !
Haha
You can always count on fellow pervs ^^

I like this foot thing she's doing. please continue

A law can be unconstitutional, but if no one challenges it, does it matter? Didn't it get every vote in the house except two? I'll be surprised if it gets shot down.

Happy to help share the wealth, fren

Bipartisan law.
Kamala would do the same btw.
Anyway for AOC 2028 this law is a nice gift she will gladly expand upon.
how are the private local genns anyway in that new law?

imagine putting your face on the anti-deepfake law appeal. you'd be unhirable for life

Don't forget, it has to be photo realistic for it to be illegal. The only scary part of that is I have no idea what some boomer judge is going to consider photo realistic kek
but celeb AI images can still be published they just have to look more like fan art rather than photography

A law can be unconstitutional

Name one. Besides Take It Off.

Aly Raisman >>>

ObamaCare. Retard, read the full sentence.

Not all pornography is protected by the 1st amendment.

Mods and Jannies will fucking delete ALL AI pics. Why? Because why take a chance?

AOC in a bikini. You think 4chin is gonna risk keeping it up cuz it MAY be okay? No, they will nuke it. They’ll nuke all AI pics cause they don’t have the time to debate what’s legal now and what’s not.

Trump ruined porn

Anon Babble's only obligation is to take down requests. The part of the bill that covers hosts functions similarly to DMCA. Anon Babble allows copyrighted content still right?

Post Mikey Madison and Isabella Merced

Yes, very good request.

Only CP and obscenity (beastiality, incest, etc) porn are illegal.

Until now. Now FAKE porn is illegal.

You think mods and jannies are gonna wait to get a TID notification on picrel??

If you do, you’re fucking insane.

what free speech? Shit is censored here to hell and back. They shadowban certain people and posts CONSTANTLY.

they can argue it's obsene or they will make a new exception to cover AI porn. Everybody in congress will vote for it since they all overwhelmingly voted to pass the bill in the first place. AI porn only appeals to coomers so it's a losing battle.

Most art is
AI fakes are not photographs

I just don't understand how something like this could apply to public figures
It seems to be happening but what the fuck

it will get to the point where it is close to photograph quality.

Bestiality is illegal? They're not doing a very good job at preventing it then.

Celeb porn is the greatest thing to happen in the 21st century. You cannot stop it.

It is a fictional, fabricated depiction.
It does not matter if it is photo realistic. It should be illegal because the art is too good? Does that actually sound like good reasoning to you?

I never see it so it obviously works.

it is already photograph quality or better kek!

hey guyz y don't we jus go to da court system n challenge da ruling hehe

What does it matter if its close to a photograph when the real life equivalents of these fakes are legal? This has nothing to do with the content being obscene, its about people owning their image or whatever which doesn't make any sense considering fan works are completely legal and valid.

well it can cause reputational harm. What happens if you see an AI image of a girl you want to date and she's getting fucked by 5 guys and you decide not to date her and you can't tell if its AI or not?

This shit is serious and they wanted to make a point by shutting down this site to send a message

I deleted all my ai images from here and anywhere else, they made the equivalent to cp shits not worth it im done

Call me a cuck all you want its not worth having those awesome images anymore no matter the context

For the record I have deleted all images of celebrities from my folders and will not be willing to share or upload to any parties that will host them .

Im ducked out bros

an obvious workaround is ensuring that all the generations of female celebrities are given g-cup tit sizes, no?

They've tied it to revenge porn which is just insane. It has truly nothing in common.

Just require labeling. I would be completely okay with things needing to be labelled AI but with this bill that doesn't matter.

some people will use them in malicious ways.

Nobody gives a fuck

Go shoot a dog fucking movie in America and then try to load it up onto Pornhub. See what happens.

That's covered in the bill as well... nothing about publishing AI fakes prevents them from stopping abuse. You don't need to ban all fakes. It can simply be illegal to use for blackmail, threats, to claim its real, etc.
Its not that complicated.

Just require labeling.

people will just crop out the label and share the pics without it.

You're not a cuck. Is clear that the shut down from last week was in relation to this..

Then they will get in trouble in the same way everyone will get in trouble currently.... What is your point?

You understand generating isn't illegal under this bill. It's just publishing. If people crop it out and repost, they'll get fined or prison time simple as.

it's not just blackmail or whatever. You can AI generate a pic of someone you don't like doing a nazi salute and share it and damage their reputation if people think it's real.

then make not labeling as AI illegal
How is this hard to understand?

how do you know who originally cropped it then? I'm saying someone will make a pic with a label, share it here, people download it, crop it out, then continue to share it without the label.

You can still do that
This bill only covers intimate acts
What you describe would fall under already existing laws related to damaging reputation anyways.

You need a verified account to do that. They got rid of all of the good porn years ago. Though now that I think about it, perhaps the sites weren't American. I don't know, I was like 13.

yes that's the whole issue. You won't see AI pics on sites like this anymore. You can't stop people from making it privately.

It doesn't matter who originally cropped it in the same way it will not matter with the current bill who originally generated. The only thing that matters is who publishes and then gets reported. It would function the exact same way this current bill does, just with a more precise scope.

slander/libel is and has always been illegal. parody is not illegal, but perpetrating these kinds of acts with malicious intent is. very simple fix.

AI porn

It’s clearly the future of both porn and legit movies/tv. It’s better quality and a fraction of the production cost of making real stuff with real people.

If you think it will just go away cause the politicians in DC are virtual signaling to get on the good sides of their rich celebrity friends, then you are brain dead.

Technological advancements and the potential to make trillions of dollars ALWAYS wins. Not whiny celebrities.

I just wanna see my favorite women with big tity

it would be hard to know who originally made and uploaded the pic in the first place.

lol

loophole

The only thing that matters is who publishes and then gets reported.

that would be impossible for a site like this where someone uploads and it gets downloaded a bunch of times. How do you know who originally uploaded?

You got it king

Bro is out here with a parts kit for AI nudes

Its only illegal to publish the images
There was another bill that had possession (DEFIANCE act) but that hasn't passed yet and it wouldn't surprise me if it just dies since Take it Down passed.
Its not even illegal to generate yet. It literally only matters if you post it somewhere.

the problem is you're making AI porn of someone who didn't consent.

Are you trolling or legitimately struggling with this?...

yes but you can't find out who originally made the pic if it gets passed around a ton of times on the internet.

Requesting you faggots post more.

fan art does not need consent
its not actually their bodies, or actually them. Its a fictional depiction.

what is the original argument? We're probably on a tangent and I'm responding to multiple people so maybe I'm off base.

Civil disobedience
/ˈsivil ˌdisəˈbēdēəns/
noun
noun: civil disobedience
the refusal to comply with certain laws or to pay taxes and fines, as a peaceful form of political protest.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_disobedience

read the law, it outlaws all photoshopping of anybody

(3) OFFENSE INVOLVING DIGITAL FORGERIES.—

(A) INVOLVING ADULTS.—Except as provided in subparagraph (C), it shall be unlawful for any person, in interstate or foreign commerce, to use an interactive computer service to knowingly publish a digital forgery of an identifiable individual who is not a minor if—

(i) the digital forgery was published without the consent of the identifiable individual;

(ii) what is depicted was not voluntarily exposed by the identifiable individual in a public or commercial setting;

(iii) what is depicted is not a matter of public concern; and

(iv) publication of the digital forgery—

(I) is intended to cause harm; or

(II) causes harm, including psychological, financial, or reputational harm, to the identifiable individual.

(4) PENALTIES.—

(A) OFFENSES INVOLVING ADULTS.—Any person who violates paragraph (2)(A) or (3)(A) shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.

every picture = 2 years in jail, add it up

Post (some at least) Emma M

I only watch my movies in 15min parts on youtube

Mods and jannies will still just delete it.

That’s the ultimate effect of laws like these. They incite fear to the point where all the enforcement (justified or not) is done by the websites.

Jannies and mods will be the de facto court system, NOT any real judges or prosecutors.

Was MKUltra secretly a 5head this whole time? Did he know the bill was going to pass? Maybe that's why he makes sure none of his lora have any resemblance to any celebrities so people can still use them

my fucking sides.

How does your confusion on who gets in trouble not apply to the current bill?
How would you know who originally posted really any image ever? What about cropping it changes anything?

Not every website is hosted in the US though

the identifiable individual has to report you first, which is extremely unlikely. even more so if its posted here as it wont be i direct report onto you

Nope
Digital Forgeries are defined explicitly as intimate images

what if we just ignore the law

you're saying punish the person who uploads uncropped but it would be hard to find out who uploads it in the first place on a site like this.

So if you live in say, Mexico and you post up these ai pics, can't do shit right?

you first

How is it harder than knowing who uploads an AI fake in general? You know people will still post them here, it will have to be moderated and handled in the exact same way a cropped image would have to be.

that didn't do Megaupload a lot of good when the US Gov came knocking

Anon Babble will probably still *Take It Down*

is there a 5chan?

I'm just saying that ultimately you won't be allowed to upload and share AI pics anymore and labeling them as AI won't do anything to change that in the eyes of the government since they won't care.

With the current bill, labeling doesn't matter. I was saying, to fix the issues people want to fix (blackmail) you could easily just have a law that requires labels and I don't see how moderating that would be any different from moderating all AI fakes.

read the law

doesnt fully read the law and posts something out of context

what did anon mean by this

you can do it, just put yer back into it

fee.org/articles/11-of-the-most-memorable-acts-of-civil-disobedience-in-history/

what celeb loras should i download b4 they're nuked Anon Babble?

Scarlett, Natalie, Daisy, Emma, Adria.

Couldn't you just like give them cat ears or some shit so its not

indistinguishable from an authentic visual depiction of the individual

you want me to spit on THAT thang??!

so what happens if someone from Europe posts something?

Then it wouldn't apply to them but if the site is hosted in the US they would have to take it down. Do you think the current bill applies to people in Europe somehow?

oh yeah. more please.

Wait actually
I'm not savvy enough to know if its this stupid and easy. In a legal sense what does an authentic visual depiction even mean? Couldn't you add small fantastical details and just completely circumvent this?

Gotcha,. No I dont think so and I dont see how it could be enforced if its coming from some other country.

Where do you even get celebrity loras now? Doesn't look like any are on cititai.

Turn off your X/XXX filters nigger. Or just create an account on .green

Moar

reminder to all my gooner doomers

seconded

Any good Kira Kosarin or Isabel Merced?

All my filters are off. Post a link to a celebrity lora from civitai. Maybe I'm just high but it doesnt seem like they're there anymore.

Well at least the blender/SFM fags can pick up the slack once Death Stranding 2 models get ripped

I read on SC that a lot of them are no longer indexed but direct links still work

thanks

I'm looking at them right now. He needs to either do what I told him to do or just go without.

yeah a lot of them are gone for me too

I didn't know they took these down. I Can't find them anywhere! Any generous dude want to drop these in on session? The body pillow one is perfect

kek i need the one ending in 454333

why do my lust gens look so bad

I would very much like to see a Moner cumshot.

yum

Those will all be de facto illegal. Even if not outright porn, sites will nuke them all just to be safe.

The era of political parody, satire and memes created through AI and PS is officially dead.

So news papers cant make cartoon politicians anymore?

Any good Anna Kendrick or Blake Lively gens?

So AI like picrel are legal, but a gen of AOC in sexy lingerie will be illegal?

So basically it’s a law to protect the rich and famous and fuck everyone else hurt or offended by AI gens, right?

Anna, yes, tons of good ones.

But no one ever came close to genning a decent Blake.

based genners where art thou

Europeans and nasty Indians saved us lol

Could you just add a part of the image that is blatantly absurdly fake but also off to the side thus croppable/ignorable? Does this negate "indistinguishable from an authentic visual depiction of the individual" or is their body being realistic the only thing that matters? Not really asking here but I'd be curious to see a lawyer actually explain this in detail because I don't fully understand what the law covers.
With Revenge Porn its mostly cut and dry since its real photos that exist in an inherently real context but applying the same rules to AI is extremely confusing.

I can't wait to start seeing cases for what constitutes authentic depiction. You're going to have guys out here being like "Look at that freckle on her cheek. She doesn't have a freckle like that. Clearly not an authentic depiction"

150 images

page 9

Yea I'm not really sure what is meant by it. I'm guessing it means where someone could mistake it for really being them so little details won't matter but like another anon said, what if you just add like cat ears or something fantasy related? Does that just work? I'm not sure what the law is getting at exactly. Do they care if you think its real or not or is it just about it feeling realistic? Guess we'll wait and see.

"Look at the cum on her face. She doesn't have cum on her face like that. Clearly not an authentic depiction."

18y foy, elle, ever, dafne

new?