Imagine belonging to a party filled with so much hate you watch your team go after slave wagies to get their revenge...

Imagine belonging to a party filled with so much hate you watch your team go after slave wagies to get their revenge. Fucking hell

I like to stronk my conk

I hate neo-marxists so much it's unreal bros

marxism is when you expect fast food restaurant workers to wash their hands before handling food

Learn to compose a sentence in english

They wouldn't be slave wagies if demoshits hadn't fucked up the economy for 4 years.

So... Trump made them not wash their hands?

You don't seem to have much focus in this pathetic little anti-Trump temper tantrum you're having.... you seem sort of stupid.

Imagine belonging to a party filled with so much hate

Lol

Every accusation is a confession

imagine living in russia

What is this post supposed to mean? It doesn't even make sense.

Oh hey, it's the incel basement dweller who says "muh russians" in every thread... how surprising that he showed up to act like a fag....

You are a dumb person

In Trumps dictatorship those inspections won't even exist because they are "woke"

And retards like you cheer.

This fat tub of shit has never had to work a job a day in his life.
What was this stupid shit supposed to prove?
He's doing this childish shit instead of hammering home how bad the economy has been under the pajeetnigger bitch and Biden.
What a moron.

I love all the seething from all the Libtards and Trans folks. I'm sure they have some news about Kamala to talk about. Oh, how is she doing with the black male vote?

When did I say that?
But sure, foul people generally attract other foul people.
And not washing your hands before handling other people's food sounds pretty foul to me.

just keep your fingers in your ears, and eyes closed. repeat your mantra "Trump is a felon, Vance is weird. Walz is a cool war veteran, and Kamala is a smart capable woman"

There he goes, talking about trannies again

I mean…that’s all true.

I love watching democrats pretend to be republicans. They know all the cool racial slurs.

good puppet.

I'm a fast food worker. I wouldn't expect the privileged to understand

Why is every leftist meme a reskin or brick of text?

Words.png - 1600x900, 503.46K

I don't understand how jiggling a tray of fries for 15 minutes in a closed McDonald's is supposed to make RINO Trump looks like he can relate to the middle class. Does he not realize Americans usually work for more than 15 minutes?

if donOLD had to work for more than 15 mins, he'd die of exhaustion

the geezer is fading fast

Brace yourself, because this is gonna shock you.

There are a lot of leftists on Anon Babble who also happen to be anti-woke racists. You see, there was a time when this cesspool wasn't filled with Christian-larper Republicans who worship Donald Trump - and yet it's always been filled with racists.

marxism/socialism is when {most retardedly reductive caricature of my opponent's argument i can think of}

praxis makes perfect

don't wash your hand to own the libs

trump claims to be germophobe and yet he did not washed his hand

There was an argument?

Your party has done infinitely worse. jump off a bridge troll

Like what?

Climate change denial, war in Iraq and Afghanistan, income inequality, opposition to healthcare reform and the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), erosion of voting rights, tax cuts for the wealthy, opposition to LGBTQ+ rights, blocking gun control legislation, undermining public education, anti-immigrant policies, increased militarization of police.

To name a few.

Climate change denial

that thing I can never seem to provide proof of

SIT THE FUCK DOWN!

the privileged

As if Trump isn't privileged lmfao

Look at you, a list where every single thing is the opposite.

1587789954132.png - 601x600, 184.26K

sure, and the worlds flat and there are jewish space lasers. your retard is showing

retard hole.jpg - 1024x1024, 698.5K

Prove it, you fucks voted for them also, you've done nothing to fight it, Obamacare was a government handout to health insurance companies, its easier for illegals to vote than ever, (cant argue with that really), who gives a fuck about faggots, we need less gun laws not more, public education has been a joke since the 80s, fuck illegals, and we need more police, not less.

The right can't meme

Ah yes, the Republican party that wants to help and loves the LGBTQ+ community.

that thing I can never seem to provide proof of

Obamacare was a government handout to health insurance companies

It's not, I promise you. It's actually effective and a decent option for a lot of people that literally have no healthcare.

who gives a fuck about faggots

Not republicans since trumps clearly one

that thing I can't provide proof of

Literally 1984, they say I have to bathe (woke) if I wanna keep my job.

So?
What the fuck does that have to do with anything?
He's not the ceo, nor is he even the manager. Passing the health inspection isn't his job, and that alleged health inspection would have happened long before he ever stepped foot inside the building. You're grasping so hard it's pathetic.

that thing I can't provide proof of

Lol

Oof. It's sad how reality never seems to agree with these poor righties

thanks, i added these to my 'Maga are retards' folder

that thing I can't provide proof of

Leemao

Ironic since that one image is constantly being posted by petty hate filled people or bots that resemble such types. Meanwhile we have the same cherry picked handful of people depicted EVERY SINGLE TIME out of millions. People that could easily be someone that tossed on some merchandise and made angry faces for the sake of a less than flattering photo of the group they dislike.
Protip: If you cannot respond to this comment respectfully despite it showing no hostility or disrespect odds are you are in no position to talk about the hateful nature of others.

Before you know it they'll hit you with the "I won't be here so I don't care!" line. Gotta love it.

that thing I can't provide proof of

Lole

god forbid you treat your fellow human beings decently. just admit youre nazi's like kanye was brave enough to do

Me pleasure

AGW relies on a flat Earf.
You have any proof yet? It's been years now. You should have found something.

It wasn't a meme.
Left can fact.

yep. then theyll ask the next person for proof too. theyre truly an insufferable lot

reading is difficult for me

We can tell.

Come back when you understand ice core proxies and how you can't just stitch a model to the end of it.

They'll fight for their rights, whish was the opposite of the claim.

Lol oh, by all means, explain it to us.

It's a fact that the planet is warming at a rate of 10 times the average rate of warming after a cooling period, but you go ahead and explain it. I'll wait.

I know more than thousands of ph'd meteorologist

It's weird how comfortable you guys are being this retarded.

They'll fight for their rights

Are you messing with me? lol Republicans want to destroy the rights of anyone that isn't a straight white male. They'll only fight to rip the rights of others away, as they've done already.

Levitus et al 2012

We provide updated estimates of the change of ocean heat content and the thermosteric component of sea level change of the 0–700 and 0–2000 m layers of the World Ocean for 1955–2010.

IR doesn't go through the first mm of water. This is not an AGW argument.

corresponding to a rate of 0.27 W m−2(per unit area of the World Ocean) and a volume mean warming of 0.18°C.

0.18°C. That's your climate change? How large are the error margins on that?

What was this stupid shit supposed to prove?

It's a political stunt like all other political stunts - trying to convince retarded plebs like you that the elite actually give a shit about you, which they don't.

He doesn't need to hammer the economy. Everyone can fucking feel it, and if you don't you either have an room temp IQ or are a dependent on someone who actually does feel it.

shitty graph from a model

That's not evidence. It's a simulation that never happened.

Wait, lemme get this straight. You're just gonna cherrypick some data regarding the ocean temps as if it's a mic-dropping argument against anthropogenic warming? Look at the rest of the graphs I posted, you fucking mong - or I guess you could just continue to bury your head in the sand.

And I don't know what the margin of error is. Maybe read the rest of the paper you're citing.

one location

Explain how the entire Pacific Rim has falling sea levels.

Damn, got some rapid-fire replies but still no evidence.

Capture.png - 613x646, 401.24K

I know more than thousands of ph'd meteorologist

It's only a few dozen. Muh "97% consensus" is only 64 papers.

Republicans want to destroy the rights of anyone that isn't a straight white male

Proof? I've never heard this from anyone.

Lol that graph is in millions of years

You're just gonna cherrypick some data regarding the ocean temps

The irony.

Look at the rest of the graphs I posted

I don't know who you are. Did you post the modeled stuff?

Tell me you're not a Republican without telling me you're not a Republican

1643255999664.gif - 220x198, 374.43K

No shit. Look at all that warming from fossil fuels and SUVs an sheeeit.

Well no, I'm not a Republican. I'm much further right and see them as a bunch of spineless Dem-lites.

Climate change denial,

At least the religious idiots admit they were wrong when their doomsday predictions are dead wrong (or they kill themselves). Why can't you cunts admit you were dead wrong or self delete? No nuclear winter, no flooded continents, no runaway temps. None of your shit has come true.

war in Iraq and Afghanistan,

USA warmongering 101, both sides love it, keeps the MIC going.

income inequality

Fuck your little commie redistribution plan, I'd rather not wait in breadlines like Russiafags.

opposition to healthcare reform and the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare)

Ah yes, the "give more money to insurance plans" healthcare plan. Sure did jack shit for people. Just like the "pay big pharma whatever they want for insulin" plan.

erosion of voting rights,

That is your party bucko. Importing illegals dilutes real citizen votes. ID doesn't deny anyone rights, otherwise CCL would be unconstitutional.

tax cuts for the wealthy,

Bullshit Democrat talking point, Dems ARE the wealthy fucking everyone over. Everyone knows you fucks hate the working class with a burning passion equivalent to a thousand suns.

opposition to LGBTQ+ rights,

They have 100% of the rights the rest of us do already, get fucked.

blocking gun control legislation

Fuck you for going after civil rights, and we all know you hate kids already, pedofag.

undermining public education,

Again, that is 100% your party with the LCD shit. Republicans just want out of it.

anti-immigrant policies,

Yeah, we're full and employment is getting worse. We can't handle anymore. But the gangs are nice right?

increased militarization of police.

Unfortunately this was bipartisan. Dems love it though, great for keeping bootlickers like you occupied with boot licking. How's that "defund" shit going? Oh, it stopped? Huh, fancy that.

the irony

Omg the irony of posting a well-rounded set of graphs and incontrovertible facts while you just try attempt to introduce doubt like a good little useful idiot.

I like to pummel my cylinder.

That's not evidence, it's a blog.

the western Pacific Ocean has been increasing at a rate 2–3 times the global average

There is no global average. The reality is SSL is extremely shaky. We have land subsidence and shifting plates. A few years ago they though Antarctica lost a large amount of ice. Turns out the entire continent moved and the satellites weren't set up to monitor moving land. We are actually gaining land area and coastline because oceanic faults are pushing land upward. We have no clue what the ocean is doing as far as levels.

Go ahead, poke around. It's a sloshy world.
psmsl.org/data/obtaining/map.html

This is a blatant lie. There's no way you can be this ignorant. It's based on hundreds.

REE REE here's my retarded alt right opinions

No one asked

Maybe read the rest of the paper you're citing

Not that anon, but back when CC really was picking up steam with it's little retard child spokeperson (holy fuck I'd kill myself if I was a climate scientist and that troglodyte represented my field), I took the opportunity to read some of their shit. And holy fuck it is a conglomeration of bad science and hand wavy math. The vast majority of CC papers are just bullshit models on par with AI - trained off a bunch of data which it then it used to spit out a bunch of bullshit predictions that haven't come true. Only one that I reviewed had solar power as a driving function, meaning all of the others were 100% fucking dead wrong - they couldn't even nail the basic science down. So yeah, the people you are citing are likely frauds pretending to be experts, which they can get away with because no one gets called out and fired when their bullshit claims don't come true. Your little pool of experts would dwindle to nothing if subjected to proper peer review and scientific results reproduction. As it stands now, it's just a glorified political cash transfer field now - just one party trying to nab money via fake carbon credit shit or whatever scam of the month it is.

CC is not like the ozone layer issue - that shit was 1) clearly communicated, 2) had a clear action plan derived from understanding root cause, 3) didn't require magical thinking or some weird tax theft scheme, nor ignoring the rest of the world's inputs. We said X was bad, make it illegal, boom problem solved.

If the world REALLY is in trouble, you need to be livid with China and ready to go to war over it. Yet no CC fuckhead seems to care about the world's biggest polluter (of course, CC activists are communists as well, can't anger the motherland right?). An odd oversight for the "experts".

Not really much substance here, but I appreciate the response.

I'm sure the evil climatologists are just fudging the data and all the libertarian bloggers and scientists, many of whom are paid by fossil fuel companies, are being 100% totally honest and not biased at all.

What graphs and what facts?

while you just try attempt to introduce doubt

You should be doubting when they refuse to show any correlation between CO2 and temperature. Where's the formula? How much CO2 should I add to a jar to increase 100 ml of water by 1 degree? There's no scientific experiment demonstrating it. There's the two jar thing you always see at some grade school, but they always cut the experiment short, before both bottles reach the same temp. And why don't they ever put a 3rd jar full of soil next to it and measure how much that warms up?

There is simply not a single shred of evidence that backs it up. You posted that ocean temp chart... just looking at the first source in the list and there are several problems:
- They used a collection of corrected and uncorrected data from ARGO and attached it to the end of whatever records they had.
- ARGO ran extremely hot for many years when first introduced. Many say they're still hot.
- Oceanic heat has a latency of 300-1500 years. You can not measure temperature man induced 100 years ago.
- IR only penetrates the first mm of water. There is not enough energy absorbed to change the world's oceans in a matter of years or even decades with just the sun.
- It's been understood for a long time now that AGW doesn't affect ocean temps, for the reasons listed above.
- The only ocean currently warming (last I checked) is the North Atlantic. The others are cooling or remaining steady.

It's based on hundreds

Nope. It's right here:
skepticalscience.com/tcp.php?t=home

I forget the numbers of papers but they started with 11,000 papers and filtered them out to those only peer-reviewed, leaving 1900. Then they filtered them out by addressing climate, leaving 138. Then they found the ones that took a stance of AGW, leaving 65 papers. 64 of those papers said "yes, man is causing it". That's your 97%.

It would appear you're wrong

That's just one area and gives no cause of it.
I can't find the thing I'm looking for that shows the increase of the land around the world. All I can find right now is how almost all islands are growing.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213305421000059
nature.com/articles/s41467-023-36171-2
wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wcc.557
researchgate.net/publication/329488438_Absolute_Evidence_of_the_Absence_of_an_on-Going_Sea_Level_Rise_on_Ouvea_Island_of_New_Caledonia

Also see:

I already addressed that. One single station is evidence of nothing. I even provided a handy tool that let's you look around at stations globally.

Haven't worked in a McDonald's since highschool, and even then we would shit on a dumb retard just sitting there staring at the fryer. Multitask you fucking chud.

I worked the fry and the griddle
I'd trip Trump going down the stairs
nigga broke his neck

You should be doubting when they refuse to show any correlation between CO2 and temperature. Where's the formula?

This explains it better than I could:
factsonclimate.org/infographics/concentration-warming-relationship

The only ocean currently warming (last I checked) is the North Atlantic. The others are cooling or remaining steady

Wrong again

pmel.noaa.gov/gtmba/news-story/why-north-pacific-warming-so-fast

And you keep fixating on the ocean while ignoring the fact that the planet is definitely warming at a significantly faster rate than normal.

Dude, the first 2 articles aren't exactly supporting your dismissive attitude regarding climate change. Not only do they acknowledge that AGW is a problem, they go on to explain why these islands have been resilient to rising sea levels.

This explains it better than I could:

Dude, stop posting this horseshit. Activist links don't ever provide evidence of anything. Where's the fucking formula? Where's the correlation observed? There are plenty showing CO2 does nothing in relation to other gasses, the earlies I'm aware of is Angstrom in 1901, but there's nothing showing CO2 changing temperature. It's just some fucking magic that happens between "burn oil" and "it's hot in summer".

another activist link

Fucking hell, anon. Show some science and ignore the propaganda.

And you keep fixating on the ocean

Well that's the only credible thing that's been posted so far, even though it's pretty shaky and only shows 0.18°C warming.

the fact that the planet is definitely warming at a significantly faster rate than normal

It's not a fact. Where the hell do you get this? Is it from all the hockey sticks?
Protip: it's upside-down.

PROXIES.png - 1033x849, 169.97K

they acknowledge that AGW is a problem

Sure, but their opinion doesn't matter when they have measurable observations. Remember that the Maldives were supposed to be underwater years ago.
Like I said, that's all I found while looking for increasing coastlines. I'm still looking.

Ok, I'm done with you. If you're just gonna dismiss every source without addressing any of the content, you're obviously too dishonest to reason with. Like every other AGW denier, the only thing you do is introduce doubt. You just question the legitimacy of various equations, graphs, and other data without coming close to proving anything wrong.

Well that's the only credible thing that's been posted so far

And yet you've done nothing to support this notion.

It's not a fact. Where the hell do you get this?

I'll leave you with another ""activist source""
climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-temperature#:~:text=Recent warming is much faster,Fahrenheit or more per decade.

It's almost like measuring actual temperatures gets different results than drilling ancient ice

Why are you conveniently ignoring their explanations why those islands have been resilient? Hmmm

This article addresses the issue

"So if sea levels are rising across the planet, why are some beaches still getting bigger?"

"The answer is that for growing beaches, the positive sediment budget currently has a greater impact than erosion from sea level rise. In other words, the amount of sand coming to the coast is greater than the amount lost to sea level rise."

sciencealert.com/sea-levels-are-creeping-up-but-some-beaches-are-getting-bigger-here-s-why

dismiss every source

Those aren't sources. They're digital pamphlets. Where's the math? Where's the science? They even repeat the "2023 was the warmest year on record" when that claim has been thoroughly debunked.

And then the other other one gives an equation

The theoretically derived relationship

This is the formula they use as a control knob in models, since they don't have actual math to put in there, they have a sliding variable they use to iterate the next scary hockeystick.
Here's how the models work.
netzerowatch.com/s/Eschenbach-Climate-Models.pdf

And yet you've done nothing to support this notion

I'm supposed to support your graph? I already gave you the reasons the oceans aren't susceptible to AGW. I was just mentioning that that was the most scientific thing you've posted so far.

I'll leave you with another ""activist source""

That's not a source, that's more modeling! Motherfucker, do you even know what a source looks like? NOAA doesn't even have that kind of global data, they just make it the fuck up. Let picrel play.

122016.gif - 500x386, 76.45K

Yes, I saw that.

Those aren't sources. They're digital pamphlets

The fuck are you talking about? They are sources - they're just sources you don't like. Are they scientific papers? No, but they have copious links to published papers that contain the math you so desperately want to see.

That claim has been thoroughly debunked.

CHECK OUT THIS GIF

Lol

This is the formula they use as a control knob in models, since they don't have actual math to put in there

actual math

I'm starting to think you're an actual shill with nothing substantive to offer.

I already gave you the reasons the oceans aren't susceptible to AGW

And I've provided multiple sources refuting your claim.

Ok, I'm done forreal this time. Bye.

Cool

this

NetZero

Lol, stupid ass Brits are the last people I'll listen to.

copious links to published papers

Then just publish the papers. Publish this evidence that doesn't use models or start temp records in 1979.

Lol

Its what they do. There are very few stations in the southern hemisphere.

I'm starting to think you're an actual shill

I wish I was. I'd love to get paid for this shit.

with nothing substantive to offer

Says the pro-AGW clown with a bunch of blogs used as sources.

And I've provided multiple sources refuting your claim.

Refuting or proving? Activists say all kinds of shit, but they never have evidence.

Ok, I'm done forreal this time. Bye.

You never started, really.

Eh, whatever. It's a book explaining how the models work. And why not? You'll listen to literally anything else.

Or you cannot deliver your message coherently and have to make a word salad like creationists explaining history.

You'll listen to literally anything else

You base that off what exactly? The single post I made laughing at your shitty campaign group source from the retards of Europe?

Two.
More.
Weeks.

One debate, won't do interviews due to fears of being corrected when he speaks like the dottering old man he is, literally put the fries in the bag. How do you glaze his cock so unabashedly and not feel a sense of embarrassment?